CA2385664A1 - Recombinant phages capable of entering host cells via specific interaction with an artificial receptor - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid capable of entering a host cell by binding of its artificial ligand to an artificial receptor present on said host cell. The invention relates also to the use of the genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid and of the host cell to screen sequence libraries, including antibo dy library.

Description

Recombinant phaaes capable of enterindhost cells via specific interaction with an artificial receptor The present invention relates to a recombinant bacteriophage, pseudovirion or s phagemid that is capable of entering bacteria by specific binding to an artificial receptor. Said receptor does not comprise at its active binding site elements such as proteins or peptides that are derived from the natural receptor used in the specific initial bacteriophage - bacterium interaction.
Background of the invention io Bacteriophages, like bacteria, are very common in all natural environments.
Bacteriophages (phages) are intracellular parasites. Bacteria and their phages have a common evolutionary history and phages may have adapted to their host species by multiple mechanisms. The phage genome may consist of double-stranded DNA, single-stranded DNA, double-stranded RNA or single-stranded is RNA. Bacteriophages exist in several morphologies and can be spherical, cubic, filamentous, pleomorphic or tailed. Based on their life cycle, bacteriophages can be divided into three groups: the virulent phages capable of only lytic propagation (called lytic phages), the so-called temperate phages capable of either lytic propagation or lysogenic phase and the non-lysing phages where the mature 2o phage is continuously extruded. The virulent life cycle of wild type phages consists of infection of the host cell, i.e. attachment to a specific receptor in the bacterial cell wall, followed by entering of the phage genome in the cell, replication of the phage genome, production of the phage structural components, phage assembly and release of the progeny phages after lysis of the host cell. In the lysogenic life 2s cycle, the phage genome exists as a prophage resulting in coexistence of phage and host cell without lysis. Usually, this is achieved by integration of the phage genome into the bacterial chromosome. The life cycle of the non-lysing phages, like e.g. Bacteriophage M13, is similar to that of the lytic phages, but the infection is not followed by lysis.

Bacteriophages have been extensively used in biotechnology.
Phage genes or complete phages may be used to obtain lysis and/or killing of bacteria.
US4637980 describes the use of an E. coli strain containing defective temperature s sensitive lambda lysogens as a method for cell disruption. Smith and coworkers (Smith et al., 1987, J. Gen. Microbiol. 133: 1111-1126) describe the use of bacteriophages to treat diarrhoea in calves, caused by seven different bovine enteropathogenic strains of E. coli. W095/27043 describes a method to treat infectious diseases caused by several bacterial genera, such as Mycobacterium, io Staphylococcus, Vibrio, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Haemophilus, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Shigella, Serratia, Salmonella and Streptococcus, comprising the administration of bacteriophages with delayed inactivation by the animal host defence system. WO 98/51318 describes a diagnostic kit and a pharmaceutical composition, comprising bacteriophages to diagnose and tro treat is bacterial diseases caused by bacteria, such as Listeria, Klebsiella, Pneumococcus" Moraxella" Legionella, Edwardsiella, Yersinia, Proteus, Heliobacter, Salmonella, Chlamydia, Aeromonas and Renibacterium.
Another application of bacteriophages is the in vitro selection of proteins displayed on the tip of filamentous phages on immobilised target (= biopanning), which is a 2o powerful technique for the isolation of interacting protein-ligand pairs from large libraries, such as antibody libraries (for a recent review: Rodi and Makowski, 1999, Curr. Opin. Biotechn., 10: 87-93). However, for optimal in vitro biopanning, a purified target protein is needed. Moreover, high quality of the library is a prerequisite for success. Enrichment for selfligated vector, phages carrying zs incomplete sequences, incorrect reading frames, deletions and amber stop codons are very often observed (Beekwilder et al, 1999, Gene, 228, 23-31 and de Bruin et al, 1999, Nature Biotechnology, 17: 397-399). In the search to avoid the problems encountered with panning using imperfect libraries, several alternative techniques, both bacteriophage based and non bacteriophage based,have been developed. Non bacteriophage based techniques are, amongst others ribosome display (Dall'Acqua and Carter, 1998, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.; 8: 443-450) and the yeast two-hybrid system (Drees, 1999, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 3: 64-70).
Bacteriophage based techniques comprise display on phage lambda, SIP (Spada s and Pluckthun, 1997, Biol. Chem., 378: 445-456; EP0614989) and CLAP
(Malmborg et al, 1997, J. Mol. Biol., 273: 544-551; W09710330). SIP and CLAP
are in vivo selection techniques and have the advantage that the F+ E.coli host cells can only be infected. by bacteriophages or pseudovirions when a matched pair is formed. Both systems are based on the fact that pilin on the F-pill of E.coli io cells serve as the natural receptor for binding of the D2-domain of pill from the phage (Deng et al., 1999, Virology, 253:271-277). This results in retraction of the pilus, so that an interaction between the D1 domain of plll with the TOL
protein complex located in the E.coli cell membrane leads to the infection (Deng et al, 1999, Virology, 253: 271-277). SIP has the disadvantage that it only works for is high affinities of the binding pairs and that each target needs to be cloned, expressed and purified as a fusion with the D2 domain of pill. Therefore, with SIP, normally only one target can be screened at the time. For CLAP only small peptides (15-18 amino acids) can be expressed on the F-pilus, hence, this technique can only be used for small linear epitopes. An additional disadvantage 2o is the need for modified M13 to avoid natural infection of host cells.
Therefore, removal of the D2 domain of pill is essential. This results in a truncated form of M13 and concomitant difficulties to obtain good titres.
It is known that bacteriophages use specific receptors on the host cell wall as a way to recognise the host cell and to start the infection process. In all the Zs applications cited above, the propagation of phages, pseudovirions or phagemids is dependent on the use of the natural phage receptor, or part of it, on the host cell wall. For M13, mainly used in these systems, the natural receptor is pilin (Malmborg et al., 1997, J. Mol. Biol. 273: 544-551 ). Other examples of natural receptors are IamB for bacteriophage lambda (Werts et al, 1994, J. Bacteriol.
176:

941-947), the outer membrane protein OmpA for bacteriophages K3, Ox2 and M1 (Montag et al, 1987, J. Mol. Biol., 196: 165-174), the outer membrane proteins OmpF and Ttr for bacteriophage T2 (Montag et al, 1987, J. Mol. Biol., 196, 165-174), the outer membrane protein OmpC for the T4 phage family (T4, Tula, Tulb) s (Montag et a1.,1990, J. Mol. Biol., 216: 327-334). The T4 bacteriophage family is using a C-terminal region of protein 37 as natural ligand (Montag et al., 1990, J.
Mol. Biol., 216: 327-334), bacteriophages T2, K3, Ox2 and M1 are using protein 38 as natural ligand (Montag et al, 1987, J. Mol. Biol., 196, 165-174) whereas phage lambda is using the C-terminal portion of the lambda tail fibre protein as io natural ligand (Wang et al., 1998, Res. Microbiol, 149: 611-624).
Bacteriophage -receptor independent phage binding to mammalian cells expressing the growth factor receptor ErbB2 followed by receptor mediated endocytosis was also described: Marks and collaborators (Pout and Marks, 1999, J. Mol. Biol., 288:
203-211 and Becceril and Marks, 1999, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 255:
is 386-393) successfully isolated phage capable of binding mammalian cells expressing the growth factor receptor ErbB2 and undergoing receptor mediated endocytosis by selection of a phage antibody library on breast tumour cells and recovery of infectious phage from within the cell. However; the phage could not propagate in the mammalian cell, and the detection of the cells carrying 2o bacteriophage could only be realised in an indirect way, by expression green fluorescent protein as a reporter gene.
Summay of the invention One aspect of the invention is a genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid that is not dependent upon its natural receptor or parts thereof for zs entering a host cell.
Another aspect of the invention is a genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid capable of entering a host cell by specific binding to an artificial receptor. These artificial receptors can be endogenous host cell proteins located at the bacterial surface, or parts thereof, that are normally not involved in s the bacteriophage - bacterium interaction, but it may also be heterologous proteins, preferentially fusion proteins displaying an oligo- or polypeptide on the bacterial surface. The genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid binds to the artificial receptor preferentially by an artificial ligand. A
s specific embodiment is a genetically modified bacteriophage that is not dependent upon OmpA, OmpC, OmpF, Ttr or pilin for interaction with and/or entering E.coli. A
further specific embodiment is a genetically modified M13 bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid that does not depend upon pilin, or fragments thereof for specific interaction with and/or entering of E. coli. Said M13 bacteriophage, to pseudovirion or phagemid can enter both F' and F- E. coli cells, dependent upon an artificial receptor that is displayed on the surface of said cells.
Still another aspect of the invention is a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid that enters the host cell mediated by an antigen - antibody reaction, whereby in the binding complex no proteins or parts of the natural receptor are involved.
is A preferred embodiment of the invention is a genetically modified M13 phage, pseudovirion or phagemid displaying an antibody, preferentially the variable part of a camel heavy chain antibody for instance disclosed in international patent application WO 94/04678 and in Hamers-Casterman C et al Nature,vol 363, 3 June 1993.p 446-448, on its tip, which can enter an E.coli host cell, displaying the 2o antigen, preferentially as an pOprl fusion protein or as a ToIA fusion protein. The use of Oprl as a protein for the expression of an amino acid sequence at the surface of the cell wall of a host cell is disclosed for example in international patent application WO 95/04079 which is incorporated herewith by reference.
ToIA
has been described by Levensgood and Webster (J. Bacteriol., 171, 6600-6609, 2s 1989).
A further aspect of the invention is the use of said bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid for selective entering of a subpopulation of bacteria. Using the specific artificial receptor interaction, in a mixed culture, the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid will only enter those bacteria that carry said artificial receptor. By this, the subpopulation of bacteria can be identified and/or eliminated. One embodiment of the invention is the specific elimination of pathogenic bacteria by directing a recombinant bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid to a specific bacterial surface protein of said pathogenic bacteria. The pathogenic bacteria can s be gram positive, gram negative or gram variable and can belong, amongst other to the genera Aeromonas, Chlamydia Edwardsiella, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Haemophilus, Heliobacter, Klebsiella, Legionella, Listeria, Moraxella"
Mycobacterium, Neisseria, Pneumococcus, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Renibacterium, Salmonella, Serratia, Shigella, Staphylococcus, Vibrio or Yersinia, to without that this summation is limitative.
Elimination can be obtained by the lytic cycle of the bacteriophage, but is not limited this method. Other methods of eliminating the host cell may be the production of a toxic product encoded by the recombinant bacteriophage genome in the host cell. A preferred embodiment is the production of barnase placed after is an inducible promoter, such as the barnase - barstar cassette described by Jucovic and Hartley (Protein engineering, 8: 497-499, 1995).
Another aspect of the invention is a host cell, entered by the genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid. Such host cell comprises the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial receptor and the nucleotide sequence 2o encoding the artificial ligand. Such sequences may be expressed in the host cell in combination with marker sequences, especially sequences encoding antibiotic resistance genes. A preferred embodiment is an E. coli cell, preferentially transformed with a plasmid encoding a pOprl-fusion protein, more preferentially transformed with a plasmid derived from ptrc-Oprl, carrying a genetically modified Zs M13 phage, pseudovirion or phagemid, preferentially a pK7C3 derived phagemid, wherein said genetically modified M13 phage is modified,' especially by in vifro construction, with a nucleotide sequence encoding a protein capable of specifically binding to the pOprl-fusion protein.
Another preferred embodiment is an E. coli cell, preferentially transformed with a plasmid encoding a ToIA-fusion protein, more preferentially transformed with a plasmid derived from pBAD-TOLA (figure 11 ), carrying a genetically modified phage, pseudovirion or phagemid, preferentially a pK7C3 derived phagemid or a Fdtetdog derived phagemid, wherein said genetically modified M13 phage is s modified, especially by in vifro construction, with a nucleotide sequence encoding a protein capable of specifically binding to the ToIA-fusion protein.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, the Oprl-fusion protein is carried out in introducing the nucleotide sequence of the fusion partner acting as the region for interaction with the ligand expressed on the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or io phagemid, especially as disclosed in WO 95/04678.
Still a further aspect of the invention is the use of said bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid to identify interacting proteins, including cases where none of the members of the interacting protein is known.
In different embodiments, the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid can be is used to screen (1 ) a host cell, displaying a bait against a library of bacteriophages, pseudovirions or phagemids displaying the preys, (2) a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid displaying a bait against a library of host cells displaying the preys, (3) a library of bacteriophages, pseudovirions or phagemids displaying different preys or baits against a library of host cells, displaying different 2o baits or preys (As illustrated in Figure 1 ).
A preferred embodiment is where pOprl is used as fusion partner for the display of bait or prey on the surface of the F- E.coli strains (Williams & Meynell 1971.
Mol.
Gen. Genet. 113: 222-227) such as DHSa and UT5600 as host cell and where the phagemid pK7C3 or phagemid Fdtetdog is used for cloning the prey or bait as a 2s plll fusion protein.
Another preferred embodiment is where ToIA is used as fusion partner for the display of bait or prey on the surface of said E. coli strains and where the phagemid pK7C3 or the phagemid Fdtetdog is used for cloning the prey or bait as a plll fusion protein. Said ToIA-fusion may be at the carboxyterminal end of ToIA, possibly with a hinge region, or may result in a deletion of a smaller or lager part of ToIA. Hinge region, as used here, is an amino acid sequence, which is not necessarily limited in length, and may be even a full-length protein such as Oprl.
One specific embodiment is a ToIA-fusion in which the D1-binding domain of ToIA
s has been deleted and replaced by the fusion partner that should be displayed; in this case, preferably a genetically modified M13 phage, pseudovirion or phagemid is used in which the D1 domain has been deleted. More preferably, in this case a Fdtetdog-D1 derived phagemid is used.
Another embodiment of the invention is the construction of a subtraction library, io with the use of lytic bacteriophages, preferentially barnase expressing bacteriophages. In this embodiment, a part of the host cell library is recognised by lytic phages such as barnase expressing phages and killed upon recognition of the artificial receptor by the artificial ligand, entering of the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid and expression of the lytic gene.
is Another aspect of the invention is a method for selecting artificial receptor -artificial ligand interactions, comprising:
~ growing a host cell or a mixture of host cells displaying one or more artificial receptors, ~ contacting said host cell or said mixture with a genetically modified 2o bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid or a mixture of genetically modified bacteriophages, pseudovirions or phagemids with one or more artificial ligands, ~ selecting those cells that have been entered by one or more bacteriophages, pseudovirion of phagemid.
One embodiment of the invention is said method, whereby the selection is based is on an antibiotic resistance marker. Another embodiment is said method whereby the cells ace selected by killing of the host cell, preferentially by expression of barnase. A preferred embodiment is said method, whereby the host cell is an E.
coli cell, displaying the artificial receptor as a pOprl fusion protein, and the genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid is a genetically modified M13, displaying an artificial ligand as a pill fusion protein.
Another preferred embodiment is said method, whereby the host cell is an E.
coli cell, displaying the receptor as a ToIA fusion protein, and the genetically modified s bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid is a genetically modified M13, displaying an artificial ligand as a plll fusion protein. A specific embodiment is said method, whereby in said ToIA-fusion the D1 bindings domain have been deleted and in said plll fusion protein the D1 domain has been deleted.
io Definitions The following definitions are set forth to illustrate and define the meaning and scope of the various terms used to describe the invention herein.
Genetically modified bacteriophage: a bacteriophage of which the genome has been modified, at least by the introduction of the gene encoding for an artificial is ligand. This introduction can be as a replacement of one of the endogenous genes or as an additional gene besides the endogenous genes.
Natural receptor: protein domain, protein or protein complex situated on the host cell wall, involved in the natural initial interaction between a bacteriophage and said host cell, whereby this interaction is followed by introduction of the genetic 2o material of the bacteriophage into the host cell.
Artificial receptor: protein domain, protein, fusion protein or protein complex on the host cell wall ,whereby said protein domain, protein, fusion protein or protein complex does not contain one or more peptide fragments of at least 10 contiguous amino acids derived from the natural receptor of the bacteriophage used in the zs protein sequence or region that is involved in the interaction between bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid and the artificial receptor.
Protein : encompasses peptide, protein, glycoprotein, lipoprotein or another form of modified protein, including chemically modified protein.

Protein complex: protein - protein complex, but also protein - compound complex, whereby said compound may be any chemical or biological compound, including simple or complex inorganic or organic molecules, peptido-mimetics, carbohydrates, nucleic acids or derivatives thereof.
s Natural ligand: protein, protein domain or protein complex of the bacteriophage, pseudovirion, or phagemid involved in the natural initial interaction between said bacteriophage, pseudovirion, or phagemid, and a host cell, including recognition of and possibly binding to the natural receptor, whereby this interaction is followed by introduction of the genetic material of the bacteriophage into the host cell.
to Artificial ligand: protein, protein domain or protein complex of the bacteriophage, pseudovirion, or phagemid, whereby said protein domain, protein, fusion protein or protein complex does not contain one or more peptide fragments of at least 10 contiguous amino acids derived from the natural ligand of the bacteriophage in the protein sequence or region that is involved in the interaction between is bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid and the artificial receptor.
Host cell: any bacterial cell that can allow a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid to enter said cell after interaction of a said bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid with a natural or artificial receptor. As example, host cells include gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria, especially including E coli cells and in 2o particular F- cells which do not permit entering of bacteriophages, pseudovirions or phagemids through the pillin mechanism.
Enterina bacteria: means that the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid can enter as a whole or as a part (e.g. only the genetic material) the host cell after specific binding to the artificial receptor. The mechanism by which the material is Zs entering the host cell is not limited to specific ways and can be amongst others an active infection process or a passive uptake by the host cell. Methods for determination of the specific binding of the artificial ligand with the artificial receptor are illustrated in the examples.

~ecific binding: means that the initial step of the entering is mediated by a specific interaction between the artificial receptor on the host cell wall and the artificial ligand of the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid. This specific interaction is preferentially a protein - protein interaction. This entering after s specific interaction should be distinguished from the Calcium dependent pilus independent infection that can be detected with M13 bacteriophages in which the second N-terminal domain of glllp has been removed (Krebber et al., 1997, J.
Mol.
Biol. 268: 607-618).
According to particular embodiments, the invention relates to a genetically to modified host cell, transformed with a nucleotide sequence encoding an artificial receptor in conditions enabling that the artificial receptor be expressed at the surface of the host cell, said host cell being further transformed with a nucleotide sequence encoding said artificial ligand whereby said nucleotide sequence encoding the ligand entered the host cell as a consequence of the interaction is between said artificial ligand and a protein sequence or region on said artificial receptor.
Particular genetically modified host cells are those wherein the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial receptor and/or the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial ligand are not initially known.
2o According to another specific embodiment, the genetically modified host cell is a gram-negative bacterium, especially an E coli cell of the F- type. It should be noted, that, after binding of the bacteriophage to its artificial receptor, the F-phenotype and/or genotype may be reconverted to a F' type. Such reconversion may be realized by, as a non-limiting example, temperature induction (Novotny 2s and Lavin, J. Bacteriol. 107, 671-682, 1971 ), by induction of one or more genes encoding essential pilus proteins such as pilin, or by transfer of the pilus encoding genetic material by conjugation.
According to another particular embodiment, the genetically modified host cell is a transformed cell wherein the nucleotide sequences of the artificial receptor and the nucleotide sequence for the artificial ligand are respectively coding sequences of an antibody or a functional fragment thereof and coding sequence of an antigen, or are respectively coding sequences of an antigen and coding sequence of antibody or a functional fragment thereof.
s In said genetically modified host cell of the invention, the functional antibody fragment can be a variable fragment of an antibody, encompassing four-chain antibodies or two-chain antibody as defined in international patent application WO
94/04678, including native or modified, especially truncated chains thereof.
In a preferred embodiment the variable chain is a VHH fragment of a camelid antibody to or a functional portion of said VHH, as disclosed in the above cited patent application which is incorporated by reference.
The invention relates also to the above defined genetically modified host cell, wherein the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial receptor comprises a sequence encoding Opr1 or ToIA or a part of Oprl or ToIA sufficient to enable the is exposure, at the surface of the host cell, of a protein sequence or region capable of interacting with the artificial ligand.
A further object of the invention is a kit comprising a genetically modified host cell according to the above proposed definitions and specific embodiments or comprising a host cell and/or a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid and/or 2o means including a cloning vector enabling the construction of said host cell and/or a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to the above definitions.
A particular kit is designed to be used for in vivo panning of antibody or antibody fragment library, or antigenic sequences library.
Said kit can also be used for the simultaneous in vivo panning of both an antibody 2s fragment library, and an antigenic sequences library.
The invention therefore provides means for the identification of target sequences or molecules including especially amino acid sequences capable of interacting with a determined receptor, whether the nature or sequences of said receptor is known or unknown. Especially the invention can be used for the identification of therapeutic targets.
Short description of the Fiaures Fiaure 1 gives a schematic representation of the screening of a proteome s expression library against a camel VHH anti-proteome antibody library.
Figure 2: schematic representation of phagemid pK7C3.
Figure 3: schematic representation of plasmid ptrc-Oprl Fiaure 4: Results of the Western blot. From left to right: lane 1 shows the molecular weight markers. Lane 2 and 3 show the total lysate of E. coli, to transformed with ptrc-Oprl, respectively after growth in LB (lane 2) and M9 (lane 3). Lane 4 and 5 show the total lysate of E. coli, transformed with ptrc-Oprl-OVA, respectively after growth in LB (lane 4) and M9 (lane 5). Proteins are visualised with anti-Oprl, as described in example II.
Fiaure 5 (a and b): Schematic representation of barnase activation by inversion of is the expression cassette, due to integrase activity induced by heat shock.
Figure 6: sequence of binders for ovalbumin obtained by biopanning and PICUP
Fi ure 7: schematic representation of the phage vector Fdtetdog Fi_ aure 8: schematic representation of the phage vector Fdtetdog were the D1 domain in plll is deleted Zo Fi ure 9: schematic representation of the phage vector Fdtetdog were the D2 domain in pill is deleted Fiaure 10: schematic representation of the plasmid pBAD-Oprl Fi uq re 11: schematic representation of the plasmid pBAD-TOLA.
2s Examaales Exama~le I: Construction of M13 pseudovirions displaying Camel Heav~,r Chain antibodies (VHH) Immunisation of camels 3o A camel (B) was immunised with 1 mg hen-egg ovalbumin (Sigma) in the presence of complete Freund adjuvant, and boosted in the presence of incomplete Freund adjuvant at days 7,14, 28, 35 and 42.
Anticoagulated blood was collected for lymphocyte isolation on day 45. This results in VHH library CAMELS
s Construction of phagemid library Peripheral blood lymphocytes were prepared using Unisep (WAK Chemie, Germany). The camelid heavy chain antibodies (VHH's) from 10' lymphocytes were cloned after RT-PCR amplification in the Ncol-Notl site of the pK7C3 vector (Figure 2) and transformed in TG1 (Lauwereys et al, 1998, the EMBO Journal, l0 17 : 3512-3520). The primers for the amplification are CATGCGATGACTCGCGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCand GTGTGCGGCCGCTGAGGAGACRGTGACCWG.
The pK7C3 vector is a pHEN4 (Ghahroudi et al, 1997, FEBS letters, 414: 521-is 526) derivative where the ampicillin resistance gene was replaced by the chloramphenicol resistance gene and the haemaglutinin tag was replaced by a histidine and c-myc tag (Ghahroudi et al, 1997, FEBS letters, 414: 521-526) Construction of M13 pseudovirions displaying camel VHH
VHH's from the CAMELB library were expressed on phage after infection of the 20 library with M13K07 helper phage (pK7C3-VHHB) as described by Ghahroudi et al, 1997, FEBS letters, 414: 521-526. A library of 3 x 106 individual colonies was obtained of which 85% had the correct insert size, and 90% of these could produce a fusion protein between VHH and plll.
Selection of ovalbumin specific pseudovirions by biopanning Zs The CAMELS library was panned for the presence of binders on ovalbumin coated in wells of microtitre plates (10Ng ovalbumin / well). Bound phages were eluted and allowed to infect TG1 cells (Stratagene). After two or three rounds of parining, individual colonies were grown, periplasmic extracts were prepared and screened for the presence of ovalbumin binders in ELISA. (Skerra and Pluckthun, 1988, 3o Science, 240: 1038-1041 ). The plasmid of these binders was prepared and sequenced. We obtained 2 VHH binders of which 1 DBOVA1 (DVQLVESGGGSVPAGSLRLSCAVSGYTYENRYMAWFRQAPGKEREGVAAIWR
GGNNPYYADSVKGRFTISQDNAKNIVSLLMNSLKPEDTAIYYCAAQAGRFSGPLY
ESTYDYWGQGTQVTVSS) was the most abundant.
s Titre determination The titre of the phages was determined by incubation of 150 NI TG1 (F+) cells at OD600nm= 0.5 with 10 NI of phages of different dilutions, for 30 minutes at 37°C.
This was plated on LB-agar plates containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 2%
glucose.
to The background for infection of DH5a (Gibco BRL) was determined under the same conditions as described above for TG1.
Preparation of the phages Cultures of TG1 containing pK7C3-VHHB or 1 DBOVA1 were grown at 37°C
in 100 ml 2xTY medium containing 2% glucose, and 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol, until the is OD600nm reached 0.5. M13K07 phages (10'z) were added and the mixture was incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 2 x 30 minutes, first without shaking, then with shaking at 100 rpm. The culture was centrifuged (15', 4300 rpm, room temperature). The bacterial pellet was dissolved in 600 ml of 2xTY medium containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 25 pg/ml kanamycin, and incubated zo overnight at 30°C, vigorously shaking at 250 rpm.
These overnight cultures were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4300 rpm at 4°C.
Phages were precipitated for 1 hour on ice with PEG (20% poly-ethylene-glycol and 1.5 M NaCI), pelleted by centrifugation (30', 4300 rpm, 4°C), dissolved in 10 ml PBS and centrifuged for another 10 minutes at 4300 rpm and 4°C. The Zs supernatant was loaded on 2 ml Ni-NTA (QIAGEN), washed extensively with 50 mM NazHP04, 1 M NaCI pH= 7.0, eluted with 50 mM NaAc, 1 M NaCI pH= 4.5 and neutralised with 1 M Tris pH= 7.4. Phages were again PEG precipitated by immediate centrifugation for 30 minutes at 4300 rpm and 4°C after PEG
addition.
The pellet (invisible) was dissolved in 1 ml PBS + 100 NI PBS-caseine. 15%

glycerol was added and the phages were stored at -80°C for maximally 1 week, until further use.
Example II: display of Oerl and Oprl-ovalbumin fusion protein on E. coli s The ptrc-Oprl (Cote-Sierra ef al., 1998, Gene, 221:25-34; Figure 3) or ptrc-Oprl-ova (obtained by amplifying the gene encoding for hen-egg ovalbumin, digesting the product with BamHl and EcoRl and cloning the digest in Bglll/EcoRl digested ptrc-Oprl) plasmids were transformed in E.coli Top10F' (Invitrogen) and tested for expression in M9CAA and LB-medium in Western blot. Cells were induced with 1 to mM ITPG (Calbiochem) at OD600nm = 0.6 and grown overnight at 37°C on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm. Cells were centrifuged and concentrated 10-fold.
Total cell lysates, obtained by sonication were loaded on a 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose for Western blotting. Transferred proteins were detected using a monoclonal anti-Oprl antibody QB2 (De Vos D. et al, Journal of is general microbiology 1993, 139: 2215-2223). An anti-mouse IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma) was applied and the blots were developed with the BCIP/NBT substrate. The results are shown in Figure 4. A band at the position of intact fusion protein is clearly observed. However, large amounts of degradation products demonstrate the instability of the pOprl-ova form. Since these 2o degradation products might interfere with the infection, conditions for growth and infection were optimised, amongst others by the use of UT5600 (F-, ara-14, Ieu86, azi-6, IacY1, proC14, tsx-67, entA403, trpE38, rfbDl, rpsL109, xyl-5, mtl-1, thi1, a ompT, fepC266) (Biolabs). UT5600 is an outer membrane protease T-deficient E.
coli strain, which was used for the stable presentation of Ig scFv fusions (Maurer 2s and Meyer, J. Bacteriol., 1997, 179: 794-804) Example III: receptor independent enteringof E.coli by M13 pseudovirions.
Cultures of E.coli strain DHSa containing ptrc-Oprl (Cote-Sierra et al, 1998, Gene, 221: 25-34) or ptrc-Oprl-OVA (indicated as DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA}) were incubated at 37°C at 220 rpm until the OD600nm reached 0.6. Cells were centrifuged at 4300 rpm for 5 minutes and resuspended in the original volume and in the same medium (= washed cells*). A fraction of the cells was induced with 1 mM IPTG
and grown at 37°C for another 4 hours (**).
s To test the pilus independent entering of E.coli displaying ovalbumin on its surface by M13 phages displaying ovalbumin specific antibodies, we incubated 150 NI of E.coli cells with 10 NI phages from pK7C3-VHHB of different dilutions for 1 hour at 37°C without shaking.
Infection of E.coli was screened for by selection of incubation mixtures on LB-agar to plates containing 100 pg/ml ampicilline, 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 2%
glucose.
Individual colonies were screened in ELISA. Therefore, large single colonies (resistant to ampicilline and chloramphenicol) were inoculated in 10 ml TB
medium containing 0.1 % glucose, 100 Ng/ml ampicilline and 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol for is 8 hours. IPTG was added at a final concentration of 10 mM and the cultures were grown overnight at 37°C at 200 rpm.
Individual colonies in TG1 and DHSa were picked and grown in 10 ml TB medium containing 0.1 % glucose and 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol for 4 hours. IPTG- was added at a final concentration of 1 mM and the cultures were grown overnight at 20 28°C at 200 rpm.
Periplasmic fractions were prepared by pelleting the overnight cultures, and dissolving the pellet in 200 NI TES (0.2 M Tris-HCI, pH= 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 M
sucrose). This was incubated on ice for 20 minutes. 300 p1 TES/4 was added and incubated at 4°C for 25 minutes. This suspension was centrifuged for 25 minutes 2s at maximal speed in an eppendorf centrifuge and the supernatant was used for testing in ELISA.
Periplasmic fractions were tested in NUNC-plates coated overnight with ovalbumin (5 Ng/ml) or casein as a negative control (1 % w/v in PBS) and blocked overnight with 1 % (w/v) casein. Samples were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature and ovalbumin binding VHH's were detected with a mouse anti-Histidine-tag (SEROTEC), anti-mouse-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Sigma) and a chromogenic substrate (Sigma). The results are summarised in Table I
Table1 Positives in ELISA

DHSa 0/7 DHSa + ptrc-Oprl 2/141 DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} 7/16, 17/38, 7/24 DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA}, washed* 14/19 DHSa {ptrc-Oprl-ova} + IPTG** 3/12 s Table 1: The numbers indicate the number of positive clones in ELISA versus the number of clones that were tested. Extracts were scored positive if the OD405nm was at least double the OD of the background (coated caseine at 1 %). Numbers separated by a comma are from independent experiments.
*: The cells were washed 1 time with fresh medium before infection with phages to as described above.
**: Cells were induced with IPTG as described above.
Example IV: receator independent entering of E.coli by pseudovirions is specific for the artificial receptor is 150 NI of washed UT5600 containing ptrc-Oprl-OVA (indicated as UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA}) or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells at OD600nm= 0.6 were incubated with NI phages of pK7C3-VHHB of different dilutions for 1 hour at 37°C
without shaking. , The same experiment was repeated after pre-incubation of the phages with 1 ml ovalbumin (2mg/ml) for 1 hour at room temperature. The phages were mixed with 150 p1 of washed UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells at OD600nm= 0.6 and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C.

This was plated on LB agar plates containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol, 100 pg/ml.ampicilline and 2% glucose. Expression of 25-45 clones in UT5600 cells and DHSa was carried out as described above.
The results are summarised in Table 2.
Table2 DHSa UT5600 Cr ar Cr' ar s E.coli (ptrc-Oprl-ova) + 150 90, 73 pK7C3-VHHB phages E.coli (ptrc-Oprl-ova) + 1 2, 2 ovalbumin pretreated pK7C3-VHHB phages s Table 2: number of colonies on plates after infection of washed UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells with phages with or without pre-incubation with ovalbumin. Numbers separated by a comma are from independent experiments. cr : chloramphenicol resistant; a': ampicilline resistant to Infection of washed UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells with phages from pK7C3-VHHB pre-incubated with hen-egg ovalbumin protein, reduced the number of transformants significantly, which means that infection is dependent upon ovalbumin display on the host cell wall.
is Example V: Survival of E.coli cells andphaaes upon coincubation 150 NI of washed UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells at OD600nm= 0.6 were incubated with 10 NI phages of PK7C3-VHHB for 1 hour at 37°C without shaking.
2o This was plated on LB agar plates containing 25 pg/ml chloramphenicol, 100 Ng/ml ampicilline and 2% glucose (C).

Cells were also checked for survival upon growth (A) and upon incubation with phages (B) by dilution and plating on LB agar plates containing 100 Ng/ml ampicilline and 2% glucose. The results are shown in Table 3.
Table3 DHSa UT5600 number of cells Before incubation 2 x 108 109 (A) After incubation 5 x 10' 3 x 10$
(B) entered (C) 64 150 s Table3: Number of cells upon incubation of washed UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells with pK7C3-VHHB phages.
The titre of pK7C3-VHHB phages was determined before incubation with washed io DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells. Cells were centrifuged after incubation for 1 hour at 37°C and the supernatant was used to determine the titre of unentered phages.
The titres were determined by incubation of 150 NI TG1 cells at OD600nm= 0.5 with 10 NI of phages of different dilutions for 30 minutes at 37°C.
This was plated on LB-agar plates containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 2% glucose. The is number of transformants are listed in Table4.
Table 4 number of phages Before incubation5.6 x 10' After incubation1.2 x 10' Table4: Number of pK7C3-VHHB phages before and after incubation with washed 2o DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells survived very well when incubated with and entered by pK7C3-VHHB phages. The pK7C3-VHHB phages which did not enter UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells are still able to infect TG1 cells and are therefore stable under the conditions used.
s Example VI: Individual E.coli cells displayincLovalbumin on the surface are entered k~ a single ovalbumin specific phage.
Positive clones were selected from experiment 2 for UT5600 (clone number 10, l0 11, 12, 13, 16, 17). They were inoculated in 5 ml LB containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol, and grown overnight at 37°C. Plasmid was prepared, transformed in TG1 and plated on LB agar plates containing 25 Ng/rnl chloramphenicol and 2% glucose. Individual colonies were tested in ELISA as described before (in TB containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 0.1 %
glucose):
Tables Positives in ELISA

Table 5: number of positive clones in ELISA versus the number of clones that were tested for individual colonies.
2o Individual positive clones were selected and grown overnight for plasmid preparation. After transformation in TG1 individual colonies were tested in ELISA.
All clones scored positive, therefore we can be sure that ovalbumin specific phages have entered the cell. Colony PCR on these individual colonies showed that they have the same length if they originate from the same original clone.
Example VII' Optimisation of the conditions of receptor independent entering s Cells of DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} and UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} were grown at 37°C. A
150 NI sample was removed at different time intervals, washed and 5 x 108 phages of pK7C3-VHHB were added. This suspension was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C
and plated on LB-agar plates with 2% glucose, 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 100 Ng/ml ampicillin. Single colonies were tested in ELISA as described above. The io results are shown in Table 6a and 6b. .
UT5600. Table 6a Time of OD600 tfu Positives growth nm in ELISA
(minutes) pK7C3-VHHB

30 0.062 20 7/15 60 0.076 56 7/15 90 0.142 100 11 /15, 120 0.273 130 11/16 150 0.555 150 $/15 210 1.24 120 2/13 270 2.25 30 7/12 is DHSa. Table 6b Time of OD600 tfu Positives growth nm in ELISA
(minutes) pK7C3-VHHB

60 0.010 0 -120 0.038 23 5/13 210 0.197 97 3/8 270 0.600 84 3/5 300 0.665 64 2/8 s Tables 6a and 6b: Number of positive clones in EL1SA versus the number of clones that were tested and the number of transformants (tfu) as a function of the OD600nm of the cells. Numbers separated by a comma are from independent experiments.
io Cells of DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} and UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} were grown at 37°C.
Increasing concentrations of pK7C3-VHHB phages were added to 150 NI of washed cells at OD600nm= 0.2-0.3 for UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} and 0.6 for DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA}. This mixture was incubated for 1 hour at 37°C and plated on LB-agar plates with 2% glucose, 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol (Chl) and 100 Ng/ml is ampicillin (Amp). Single colonies were tested in ELISA as described before.

UT5600. Table7a Number Number of Number of Number of phages transformantspositives in of added on Amp/Chl ELISA positives in ELISA
(%) 7 x 106 30 0/2 -1 x 10' 20 0/2 -7 x 10' 85, 90, 150 0/5, 1 /24, -, 4, 1 x 108 70 '/4 25 4 x 108 67 4/29 14 7 x 108 300, 300 18/24, 20/20 75, 100 s DHSa, Table7b Number Number of Number of Number of phages transformants positives of in added on Amp/Chl ELISA positives in ELISA

(%) x 10' 85 10/28 36 2 x 1 O8 250 21 /43 49 5 x 108 110 17/40 43 Table7a-b: Increasing concentrations of pK7C3-VHHB phages were mixed with 150 NI UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} at OD600nm= 0.2-0.3 or with DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells at OD600nm= 0.6. Individual colonies were tested in ELISA. Numbers separated by a comma are from independent experiments.
Optimal conditions for uptake of phages were tested by mixing pK7C3-VHHB
phages with UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} or DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells at different s optical densities. Individual colonies were tested in ELISA. For UT5600{ptrc-Oprl OVA} the optimal density is between 0.15 and 0.3 and for DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA}
between 0.2 and 0.6. UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells grow much faster than DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} and are easier infected by anti-ovalbumin expressing phages (positive clones in ELISA) (73% versus 30-50% table6a-b). When io increasing amounts of phages were mixed with UT5600[ptrc-Oprl-OVA] cells (OD600nm= 0.2-0.3), more positive clones were obtained in ELISA (table7a). 75 100% positive clones were obtained when 5-10 x 108 phages were mixed with 0.5 x 10s UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells resulting in 150-500 individual colonies.
However, in DHSa{ptrc-Oprl-OVA}, no increase in positive clones in ELISA was is observed upon addition of increasing amounts of phages (table7b).
Example VIII: selective elimination by killer phages Barnase is a extracellular ribonuclease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Harfley &
Rogerson 1972, Prep. Biochem. 2: 229-242). A very low level of intracellular 2o expression of barnase in E.coli is lethal because barnase depolymerizes the RNA
of its host. Jucovic & Hartley developed a tightly controlled system (pMl47a) for the intracellular expression of barnase in E.coli (Protein engineering, 8: 497-499, 1995). The plasmid encodes barstar (a strong polypeptide inhibitor of barnase) under the transcriptional control of the Tac promotor. A barnase gene (without 2s secretion signal) has been cloned in the inverse orientation downstream from barstar. In pMl47a, the Tac promotor is followed by attP, followed by barstar, followed by the inversed gene for barnase, followed by attB. AttP and attB are derived from the phage lambda attachment site. pMl47a is not toxic for E.coli because it overproduces barstar and no barnase (OFF configuration, figure 5a).

The Integrase protein (INT function) from phage lambda recognises the attB and attP sequences and inverses the DNA fragment that is located between the attB
and attP sites in vivo. In the resulting plasmid pMl47b the Tac promotor is followed by attR, followed by barnase, followed by the inversed gene for barstar, followed s by attL. Sites attR and attL are the products of recombination between attP
and attB (Jucovic & Hartley, 1995, Protein Engineering 8: 497-499). This plasmid is toxic for E.coli because it produces active barnase in the cytoplasm of the host (ON configuration, figure 5b). The system can be switched in vivo from the OFF
to the ON configuration in the E.coli strain D1210HP (supE44 ara14 gaIK2 IacY1 io D(gpt-proA)62 rpsL20 (Str') xyl-5 mtl-1 recA13 D(mrcC-mrr)HsdS-(rm-) laclq LacY+
Ixis-kil-c1857) (Stratagene) by a short incubation at 42°C. This strain encodes the integrase function (Int; Ixis) from phage lambda, whereas D1210 doesn't have this function.
A conditionally lethal phage particle was made by cloning the conditionally lethal is cassette of pMl47a into a phagemid. A DNA fragment of pMl47a including the Tac promotor, followed by attP, followed by barstar, followed by the inversed gene for barnase, and followed by attB was amplified by PCR. This PCR product was cloned as a blunt end fragment within the EcoRl site of the pK7C3-1 DBOVA1 vector (example I) to give pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 (Before ligation, pK7C3-1 DBOVA1 2o was linearized with EcoRl and filled-in with Klenow DNA polymerase).
Plasmids of pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1, pK7C3, ptrc-Oprl-OVA and pMl47a were transformed in D1210 and D1210HP electrocompetent cells. Individual colonies were grown in LB with 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol or 100 Ng/ml ampicilline and 2%
glucose at 37°C until the OD600nm= 1.2-1.3. Half of the culture was exposed to 2s thermal induction (15 minutes at 42°C). Both fractions (before and after induction) were spread after appropriate dilutions, on LB agar plates containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol or 100 Ng/ml ampicilline and 2% glucose. The numbers of transformants were counted and are listed in table 8.

construct E.coli straintemperatureNumber of transformants/ml PM147a D1210 37C 3 x 108 Amp' 37C-42C 2 x 108 Amp' D1210HP 37C 2 x 108 Amp' 37C-42C 280 Amp' Ptrc-Oprl-OVA D1210. 37C 3 x 108 Amp' 37C-42C 2 x 108 Amp' D1210HP 37C 3 x 108 Amp' 37C-42C 2 x 10g Amp' pK7C3 D1210 37C 5 x 108 Chl' 37C-42C 4 x 108 Chl' D1210HP 37C 6 x 108 Chl' 37C-42C 3 x 108 Chl' pK7C3BB- D1210 37C 4 x 108 Chl' 37C-42C 3 x 108 Chl' D1210HP 37C 5 X 108 Chl' 37C-42C 560 Chl' Table 8: Number of transformants with or without thermoinduction of D1210 or D1210HP cells containing PM147a, ptrc-Oprl-OVA, pK7C3 or pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1.
The results show that D1210 cells (lacking the Int gene) transformed with PM147a, ptrc-Oprl-OVA, pK7C3 or pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 survive well upon thermoinduction, which indicates that PM147a, ptrc-Oprl-OVA, pK7C3 and pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 are not harmful for E.coli. PM147a, ptrc-Oprl-OVA, pK7C3 and pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 can be transformed and maintained in D1210HP if the cells are maintained at 37°C (OFF configuration). However, when cells are incubated at 42°C for 15 minutes (ON configuration), the integrase function is activated, and D1210HP
cells s containing PM147a or pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 do not longer survive. These experiments show that the phagemid pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 is toxic for E.coli strain D1210HP if inversion is induced by thermoinduction of the Int gene.
Elimination upon recognition of an artificial receptor io D1210 and D1210HP electrocompetent cells were transformed with ptrc-Oprl-OVA. A single colony was used to inoculate a culture in LB containing 100 pg/ml ampicilline. Phages of pK7C3-1 DBOVA1 or pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 were prepared as described above. 150 NI of washed cells were incubated with 5 x 108 pK7C3-1 DBOVA1 or pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 phages for 1 hour at 37°C. Half of these is mixtures was exposed to thermal induction (15 minutes at 42°C). An aliquot (before and after induction) was spread on LB agar plates containing 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 100 Ng/ml ampicilline and 2% glucose. The numbers of transformants were counted and are listed in table 9.

type of phagesE.coli straintemperature Number of transformants pK7C3- D1210 37C 8000 pK7C3BB- D1210 37C 7800 Table 9: Number of transformants when D1210 or D1210HP cells containing ptrc-Oprl-OVA were incubated with pK7C3-1 DBOVA1 or pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 phages with or without thermal incubation.
s D1210HP cells displaying ovalbumin on their surface are killed by pseudovirions containing phagemid pK7C3BB-1 DBOVA1 after thermoinduction. This experiment clearly demonstrates that coli cells, expressing an artificial receptor can be recognised and killed by a bacteriophage with an artificial ligand that recognises io the artificial receptor.
Example IX: Library versus library screenina,~" picup" screening Fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe p2, h+, arg3-, ura4-) was grown in YES
is medium (0.5% (w/v) yeast extract, 3.0% (w/v) glucose + 225 mg/I adenine, histidine, leucine, uracil and lysine hydrochloride). Cells were harvested by low speed centrifugation. 15 g wet cells were washed with 100 ml S-buffer (1.4 M
sorbitol, 40 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM MgCl2 adjusted to pH 6.5). After centrifugation the pellet was resuspended in 100 ml S-buffer containing 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM PMSF and incubated at 30°C for 10 minutes.
After centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in 60 ml S-buffer containing 1 mM
PMSF, and 460 mg Zymolase 20T (ICN Biomedicals) was added to prepare s spheroplasts. After incubation for 3 hours at 30°C, the pellet was washed five times with 100 ml S-buffer containing 1 mM PMSF. Spheroplasts were resuspended in 60 ml Tris (25 mM, pH= 7.5), 100 mM NaCI, 2 mM EDTA
supplemented with 1 tablet protease inhibitor mix (Boehringer) and lysed by two passages in French press. The supernatant was recovered after centrifugation for io 30 minutes at 15.000 rpm in SS34 rotor. 15.5 g solid ammoniumsulfate was added to 30 ml of the supernatant. After incubation on ice for 1 hour, precipitated material was recovered by centrifugation and resuspended in 20 ml PBS. The solution was equilibrated in PBS by passage over PD10 columns. Following this treatment, the protein concentration was determined with Bio-Rad protein assay kit, using BSA
is as reference protein. Six aliquots, each 5 ml in volume, with a protein concentration of 8 mg/ml, were prepared for camel immunisation.
The immunisation and blood withdrawal scheme is as follows:
2o Day 0 Collect preimmune serum Day 0 inject subcutaneously 1 tube (40 mg protein) + complete freund adjuvant Day 7 inject subcutaneously 1 tube + incomplete freund adjuvant Day 14 inject subcutaneously 1 tube + incomplete freund adjuvant 2s Day 21 Collect anticoagulated blood and serum Day 21 inject subcutaneously 1 tube + incomplete freurid adjuvant Day 28 inject subcutaneously 1 tube + incomplete freund adjuvant Day 35 inject subcutaneously 1 tube + incomplete freund adjuvant Day 38 Collect anticoagulated blood and serum A cDNA library of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is constructed by recloning the S.pombe cDNA bank that is used in Two-hybrid system (Clontech). The cDNA
inserts are amplified with specific primers harbouring restriction enzyme sites s compatible for cloning into the multiple cloning site of ptrc-Oprl. The library is transformed in UT5600 or in D1210HP electro-competent cells.
The serum immunoglobulins from the immunised animal (day 21 or 38) are passed over protein A and protein G columns to purify the conventional antibodies and the heavy chain antibodies. Each fraction is used in a Western blot to to evaluate the presence and titre of anti-S.pombe protein immunoglobulins.
Peripheral blood lymphocytes from the immunised camel are prepared using Unisep (WAK Chemie, Germany) from the anticoagulated blood isolated at days 21 and 42. The camel heavy chain antibodies (VHH's) from 10' lymphocytes are ligated after RT-PCR amplification in the Sfil-Notl sites of the pK7C3 or pK7C3-BB
is (pK7C3 with the barnase-barstar inversion system) vector and transformed in as described above, in order to obtain a library of 108 individual clones. The VHH
phages is prepared by infection of the E.coli culture with M13K07 and enriched for virions with a VHH-gplll fusion by IMAC chromatography (see before).
For the PICUP experiment, 10'-108 UT5600 cells from the cDNA library of Zo S.pombe are mixed with 10'2 phages obtained from the camel VHH library. The mixture is incubated for 1 hour at 37°C and plated on LB agar plates containing 100 pg/ml ampicillin, 25 Ng/ml chloramphenicol and 2% glucose. Colonies can only grow on this medium if the UT5600 cells are expressing a S.pombe antigen that is recognised and subsequently infected by a virion carrying an antigen 2s specific VHH. For each colony the VHH insert is sequenced with a primer annealing in the gene plll sequence, while the cDNA coding for the antigen is directly sequenced with an Oprl specific primer. The latter sequence is screened in a BLAST on the S.pombe genome sequence database to identify the gene. The specificity of the VHH (having a his-tag) is also tested in a Western blot in which the S.pombe extracted proteins are separated on SDS gels. The presence of the VHH is revealed with an anti-His monoclonal antibody (SEROTEC).
As a positive control, individual colonies from the cDNA library are used in a separate PICUP experiment. One single clone that is capable to produce a fusion s protein with the lipoprotein (as seen by Western blot) is grown and challenged with the VHH phages from the library. The VHH from clones growing on Ampicilline and Chloramphenicol are induced with IPTG, extracted from the periplasm and it's binding to the yeast protein tested in Western blot and ELISA.
To eliminate particular antigens dominantly present in the matched pairs to (S.pombe antigen - specific VHH) or particular VHH over-represented in the matched pairs, the killer phage strategy is used. To this end the UT5600 cells carrying the S.pombe cDNA library are incubated with the phages from the pK7C3-BB library of VHH. After infection the suspension is incubated at 42°C to eliminate the E.coli cells that are infected with phages. The surviving cells are is carrying S.pombe antigens that are less frequent represented in the ptrc-Oprl or pK7C3-BB libraries. In a second step these surviving cells are used to inoculate fresh medium and to restart the PICUP experiment as before.
Example X: Characterization of ovalbumin binders obtained by biopanning and by 2o PICUP.
Binders from experiment Vil where 7x108 pK7C3-VHHB phages were mixed with 3x10' UT5600{ptrc-Oprl-OVA} cells (table7a) were characterized into further detail. 18 out of 24 sequences were of 1 DBOVA1. This is the only binder that 2s could be obtained after a normal biopanning experiment (all the sequences from 31 clones that were analyzed after the second and the third round of biopanning were from 1 DBOVA1 ). Affinities for ovalbumin were determined in a competitive ELISA (table 10) and range between 4 and 200nM. The affinity of 1 DBOVA1 for ovalbumin is 26nM.

Table 10 PANNING PICUP Kp (nM) Table 10: Different binders obtained by biopanning and by PICUP. The numbers indicate the frequency of occurrence of the different binders. The affinities were s determined in competitive ELISA.
For biopanning, different rounds of selection are performed, and it is documented that the population of phages is biased for clones that grow faster than others (Beekwilder et al, 1999, Gene, 228, 23-31 and de Bruin et al, 1999, Nature io Biotechnology, 17: 397-399).
It seems that the PICUP strategy is far more powerful compared to the conventional biopannings in retrieving a larger variety of binders. The sequences of the ovalbumin binders are shown in figure 6.
is Example XI: mechanism of pick-up Cloning of the 1 DBOVA 1 VHH in the Fdtetdog vector 2o The 1 DBOVA1 VHH (isolated by the biopanning experiment) was amplified with the following primers: GAT GTG CAG CTG CAG GCG TCT GGT GGA GG and GTG TGC GGC CGC TGA GGA GAC GGT GAC CTG. Fragments were digested with Pstl-Notl, cloned in the Fdtetdog vector( Zacher, A.N., Stock, C.A., Golden, J.W. and Smith, G.P. (1980) gene 9, 127-140) and transformed in TG1 cells.

Construction of phages with D 1 or D2 deleted Gplll of the phage is a three-domain protein with each domain separated by s glycine-rich tetra and pentapeptide repeats and followed by a C-terminal membrane anchor (figure7). Domain 2 (D2) binds to the F-pilus in the F+ cell.
The pilus retracts and domain 1 (D1 ) binds to the TOL receptors present in the E.coli membrane. D1 and D2 were deleted in Fdtetdog by standard PCR-cloning techniques.
io Deletion of D1 The VHH part (1 DBOVA1 ) in the Fdtetdog vector was amplified with the following primers: GAT GTG CAG CTG CAG GCG TCT GGT GGA GG and CTG AAT GGG
GCC GCG TCG ACT GTT GAA AG. Domain 2 up to the BamHl site in domain 2 is was amplified with following primers: CTG AGG GTG GGT CGA CTA AAC CTC
CTG AG and CGA ATG GAT CCT CAT TAA AGC. Both PCR products were digested with Sall, ligated, amplified by PCR with the outer primers and cloned in the Pstl-BamHl site of Fdtetdog.
2o Deletion of D2 A fragment was amplified with and without the VHH part (1 DBOVA1 ) up to the beginning of the D2 domain with the following primers: GAT GTG CAG CTG CAG
GCG TCT GGT GGA GG and AAT AGG ATC CCC ACC CTC ATT TTC AGG
GAT AGC AAG. The PCR product was cloned in the Pstl-BamHl site of Fdtetdog.
2s The resulting constructs are shown in figures 8 and 9.
Construction of phages displaying 1 DBOVA 1 30 1 DBOVA1 from the Fdtetdog constructs was expressed on M13 in 300 ml 2xTY

medium containing 15 Ng/ml tetracycline after overnight culture at 37°C
and at 250rpm. Phages were precipitated twice with PEG as described above. The pellet was dissolved in 1 ml PBS containing 0.1 % casein and the phages were filtered (0.22Nm) before use.
s Titer determination The titer of Fdtetdog phages was determined by incubation of 150p1 TG1 cells at to OD600nm= 0.5 with 10N1 of phages of different dilutions for 30 minutes at 37°C.
This was plated on LB agar plates containing 15pg/ml tetracycline. 0D260= 1 =

x 10" phages/ml.
Display of Oprl and Oprl fusion's on E.coli The gene coding for Oprl was amplified from the ptrc-Oprl plasmid with the following primers: CAG ACC ATG GCC AAC GTT CTG AAA TTC and ATC CGT
CTA GAG CTC CAA GCT TGC CTT GCG GCT GGC TTT TTC CAG CAT GCG.
The fragment was digested with Ncol-Xbal and cloned in the pBAD/myc-HisB
2o vector of Invitrogen. The ampicillin gene was replaced by a streptomycin-spectinomycin cassette. Therefore the pBAD-Oprl vector was amplified with the following primers: CGT TCA CCG ACA AAC and TTC GTT CCA CTG AGC GTC.
The streptomycin-spectinomycin cassette was amplified with the following primers:
GTG GAA TTC GCC GGC CAA GCG GCG TCG GCT TGA and CCG GAT CCG
2s TGC ACA GCA CTT GTT GTA GAA and cloned by blunt-end ligation in the vector. The resulting plasmid is called pBAD-Oprl (figure 10).
The full-length gene encoding hen-egg ovalbumin was amplified with the following primers: GGC AAG CTT GGG CTC CAT CGG TGC AGC AAG C and GGC TCT
AGA GGG AAA CAC ATC TGC C. The PCR product was digested with Hindlll 3o Xbal and cloned in the pBAD-Oprl vector (pBAD-Oprl-OVA).

pBAD-TOLA was constructed by amplifying the ToIA gene with the following primers: AGA GAG CCA TGG CAA AGG CAA CCG AAC AAA ACG ACA AGC TC
and CGG AAT TCG AAC CTC CTG CCT CTG CGG CCG CTT TTG CTG C and cloning the resulting fragment in the Ncol-EcoRl site of the pBAD-Oprl derivative s that still contains the ampicilin resistance. Ovalbumin was cloned in this vector as full-length clone or a partial clone, starting at position 424 (aa 142). The resulting plasmids were called pBAD-TOLA-OVA and pBAD-TOLA-partOVA, respectively.
Determination of D 1 and D2 dependency of the entry of phages Io The pBAD-Oprl and pBAD-Oprl-OVA plasmids were transformed in DHSa and cultures were started at 37°C in LB medium containing 20 Ng/ml streptomycin and 50 Ng/ml spectinomycin until the OD600nm= 0.4. Cells were induced with 0.02%
arabinose for 30 minutes at 37°C and washed 3x with LB medium as described is above. 150 NI cells were mixed with 60 NI Fdtetdog, Fdtetdog-1 DBOVA1, Fdtetdog-D1-1 DBOVA1, Fdtetdog-D2 or Fdtetdog-D2-1 DBOVA1 phages in PBS
with an OD260= 1 and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The mixture was washed 5x with LB and plated on LB agar plates containing 20 pg/ml streptomycin, 50 Ng/ml spectinomycin, 15 Ng/ml tetracycline and 2% glucose. The number of colonies are 2o summarized in table 11.
The results clearly indicate that the D1 domain is still needed for entering.

binds to the TOL receptors in the E.coli membrane. Deletion of the D2 domain results in more colonies. D2 has some affinity for D1 and therefore competes for 2s binding of D1 to the TOL receptors.
Table 11 Fdtetdog Fdtetdog-PBAD-OprI 12 123 PBAD-OprI-ova 9 307 -~ Fdtetdog PBAD-OprI 0 PBAD-OprI-ova ~...

Fdtetdog-D2 Fdtetdog-PBAD-OprI 630 567 PBAD-OprI-ova 154 1066 Table 11: number of colonies when 150 NI cells expressing Oprl or Oprl-ova are mixed with Fdtetdog, Fdtetdog-1 DBOVA1, Fdtetdog-D1-1 DBOVA1, Fdtetdog-D2 s or Fdtetdog-D2-1 DBOVA1 phages of OD260= 1.
Example XII: Conjugation induced infection of recombinant E coli cells bearing an artificial receptor Preparation of the immobilized XL 1 bIueMRF'kan cells: Feeder plates were made to as follows: A culture of 50 ml XL1bIueMRF'kan (Stratagene) cells was grown at 37°C in LB medium containing 25 Ng/ml kanamycin until OD600nm= 0.5.
Cells were pelleted, dissolved in 1 ml LB medium and mixed with 40 ml top-agarose (0.8%) at 52°C. This mixture was poured on a layer of LB agar. Cells were grown for another 2 hours at 37°C before use.
is Construction of p8AD-Oprl-TEM:-The full-length gene encoding TEM1 (class A (3-lactamase from E.coh~ was amplified with the following primers: CGG AAT TCA
AGC TTT GCT CAC CCA GAA ACG CTG GTG and CTG CTC TAG ACA GTT
ACC AAT GCT TAA TCA GTG AG. The PCR product was digested with Hindlll-2o Xbal and cloned in the pBAD-Oprl vector.
Expression of artificial receptors on the surface of female E. coli cells. The pBAD-Oprl-TEM plasmid was transformed in DHSa-rif (DHSa-rif is an in house selected derivative of DHSa that is resistant to 100 Ng/ml rifampicin). From these 2s recombinant cells, a culture was grown at 37°C in LB medium containing 20 pg/ml streptomycin, 50 pg/ml spectinomycin and 100 pg/ml rifampicin until the OD600nm reached 0.4. Cells were induced with 0.02% arabinose for 1 hour at 37°C
and washed 3x with LB medium as described above.
s Bio-panning and immobilization: 1.5 x 109 recombinant bacteria expressing the artificial receptor a-lactamase (TEM) on the surface were mixed with 1.5 x 10'°
fdtetdog-1 DBOVA1 (a-specific control phages) or fdtetdog-TEM13 phages (phages expressing a TEM binder; the TEM binder was isolated in a similar way as the OVA binder) in a total volume of 5 ml and incubated at room temperature io for 1 hour. The mixtures were washed 5x with 5 ml LB. The washed cell pellets were re-suspended in 200N1 LB and plated on 0.45 Nm nitrocellulose filters.
Conjugation and selection of infected cells. Filters containing the immobilized bacteria and the co-immobilized phages were then turned upside down and is incubated on feeder plates for 2 hours at 37°C for conjugation.
After conjugation the filters were cut into four equal quadrants. Each quadrant was transferred to another selective medium:
~ LB agar plates containing 20 pg/ml streptomycin, 50 pg/ml spectinomycin, 100 Ng/ml rifampicin and 2% glucose were used do count the number of 2o DHSa-Rif cells encoding a receptor that survived the procedure.
~ LB agar plates containing 20 Ng/ml streptomycin, 50 Ng/ml spectinomycin, 100 Ng/ml rifampicin, kanamycin 25 Ng/ml and 2% glucose were used do count the number of DHSa-Rif cells encoding a receptor and received the F
factor by conjugation.
2s ~ LB agar plates containing 10 Ng/ml tetracycline and 2% glucose to count the total number of bacteriophages that were co-immobilized with the bacteria.
~ LB agar plates containing 20. Ng/ml streptomycin, 50 Ng/ml spectinomycin, 10 Ng/ml tetracycline, 100 Ng/ml rifampicin and 2% glucose are used to count the number of DHSa cells, encoding an artificial receptor and containing the genome of a recombinant bacteriophage.
Results Recombinant female E.coli cell (DHSa, rif4) were transformed with a pBAD-Oprl-s TEM, encoding ~3-lactamase which is expressed as artificial receptor on the surface of E.coli. The plasmid renders the recombinant cells streptomicin and spectinomicin resistant.
Said DHSa-Rif cells encoding ~3-lactamase as the artificial receptor were mixed with recombinant bacteriophages displaying a VHH that has a high affinity for the io receptor (Fdtetdog-TEM). As a negative control, these cells were also mixed with phages that display a VHH specific for ovalbumin (Fdtetdog-1 DBOVA1 ). Both mixtures were washed by several rounds of centrifugal precipitation of the bacteria followed by removal of the supernatant, followed by re-suspension in a medium without bacteriophages. Bacteriophages expressing a ligand that is recognizing an is artificial receptor co-precipitate with the bacteria expressing this receptor.
Bacteriophages that display a ligand that does not recognize an artificial receptor on the host remain in the supernatant and are discarded during the wash procedure. By this procedure, bacteriophages displaying a ligand remain attached on the surface of those E.coli cells that express an artificial receptor that 2o specifically binds the ligand.
After a number of wash cycles, the E.coli cell pellet (containing the co-precipitated and attached bacteriophages) are re-suspended in a small volume and plated at appropriate dilutions on a (0.45 pm) nitrocellulose filter (millipore, MF-membrane filters), as described above, to immobilize individual cells on one side of the filter.
2s Bacteriophages (attached on the surface of a particular bacterium) are co-immobilized with the bacterium on a filter by this procedure.
These filters, containing the bacteria and the co-immobilized bacteriophages are then used to overlay a confluent layer of male E.coli cells (XL1-blue MRF'kan;
immobilized in a petri dish using soft agar) for two hours. The filter is placed as such that the immobilized female cells (DHSa Rif") make direct contact with the male cells (XL1-blue MRF'kan) containing a conjugational F factor that renders the host Kanamycin resistant. During this 2-hours period the F factor is efficiently conjugated from the male cells (XL1-blue MRF'kan) to the female cells (DHSa s Rif") expressing the artificial receptor, rendering these latter cells susceptible to infection with bacteriophage Fd.
After 2 hours, the filters are lifted from the layer of male cells, turned around, cut in four equal quadrants and put on LB plates containing the following antibiotics:
Rifampicin, Streptomicin, Spectinomicin, Tetracycline and Kanamicin. E.coli cells to that are resistant to all these antibiotics are of strain DHSa (Rif ), contain the plasmid encoding the artificial receptor (Strep+, Spec;), contain the F factor (Kan+) and contain the genome of a recombinant Fd phage (Tet'). In this way, DHSa cells (Rif+) can be selected that (1 ) encode the artificial receptor (Strep+, Spec') and (2) contain the genome of a bacteriophage that displays a ligand that is recognized by is the artificial receptor.
After overnight incubation at 37°C, the colonies were counted. The results are summarized in the table below.
Number of colonies when bacteriophages displaying an ovalbumin or TEM specific VHH
are mixed with DHSa-Rif cells encoding ~-lactamase as an artificial rece for Recombinant bacterio ha a Fdtetdo -1 DBOVA1 Fdtetdo -TEM

Stre S ec Rif C onfluent2 Confluent2 Stre , S ec, Rif, Confluentz Confluent2 Kan Tet 500 ~ 50.000 Stre , S ec, Rif, 60 5.000 tet 1. Antibiotics used cells.
to select for particular For Conjugation and more selection of infected details, cells see 2. Number of colonies > 106.

The observation that cells grow confluently on Strep, Spec, Rif en Kan illustrates that the F factor is efficiently conjugated from the male cells (XL1-blue MRF'kan) to the female cells (DHSa Rif ) expressing the artificial receptor, rendering these s cells susceptible to infection with bacteriophage Fd. More accurate counting on appropriate dilutions has shown that about 66% of the DHSa-Rif cells that survive the mix, wash and immobilization step acquire the F factor by conjugation.
About 50.000 Tem specific phages (Fdtetdog-TEM) were co-immobilized with the DHSa Rif cells expressing ~i-lactamase on its surFace. if we compare this to the to number of aspecific phages (Fdtetdog-1 DBOVA1 ) it can be concluded that this particular wash procedure causes an 100-fold enrichment for phages that recognize the receptor.
By comparing the numbers of specific (5000) versus a-specific (60) phages that enter DHSa, expressing the TEM receptor, we conclude that the current procedure is allows us to efficiently recover cells expressing an artificial receptor that contain a bacteriophage displaying a ligand that is specifically recognized by this receptor.

SEQUENCE LISTING
<110> VLAAMS INTERUNIVERSITAIR INSTITUUT VOOR BIOTECHNOL
<120> RECOMBINANT PHAGES CAPABLE OF ENTERING HOST CELLS VIA
SPECIFIC INTERACTION WITH AN ARTIFICIAL RECEPTOR
<130> B4389ext <140>
<141>
<150> 99402348.9 <151> 1999-09-24 <150> US 09/433,404 <151> 1999-11-03 <160> 28 <170> PatentIn Ver. 2.1 <210> 1 <211> 33 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1)..(33) <223> primer <400> 1 catgcgatga ctcgcggccc agccggccat ggc 33 <210> 2 <211> 30 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1)..(30) <223> primer <400> 2 gtgtgcggcc gctgaggaga crgtgaccwg 30 <210> 3 <211> 124 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 3 Asp Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Pro Ala Gly Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Ala Val Ser Gly Tyr Thr Tyr Glu Asn Arg Tyr Met Ala Trp Phe Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Glu Arg Glu Gly Val Ala Ala Ile Trp Arg Gly Gly Asn Asn Pro Tyr Tyr Ala Asp Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Gln Asp Asn Ala Lys Asn Ile Val Ser Leu Leu Met Asn Ser Leu Lys Pro Glu Asp Thr Ala Ile Tyr Tyr Cys Ala Ala Gln Ala Gly Arg Phe Ser Gly Pro Leu Tyr Glu Ser Thr Tyr Asp Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 4 <211> 29 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>

<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1) . . (29) <223> primer <400> 4 gatgtgcagc tgcaggcgtc tggtggagg 29 <210> 5 <211> 30 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1) . . (30) <223> primer <400> 5 gtgtgcggcc gctgaggaga cggtgacctg 30 <210> 6 <211> 29 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1) . . (29) <223> primer <400> 6 gatgtgcagc tgcaggcgtc tggtggagg 29 <210> 7 <211> 29 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1)..(29) <223> primer <400> 7 ctgaatgggg ccgcgtcgac tgttgaaag 29 <210> 8 <211> 29 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1) . . (29) <223> primer <400> 8 ctgagggtgg gtcgactaaa cctcctgag 29 <210> 9 <211> 21 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1) . . (21) <223> primer <400> 9 cgaatggatc ctcattaaag c 21 <210> 10 <211> 36 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1)..(36) <223> primer <400> 10 aataggatcc ccaccctcat tttcagggat agcaag 36 <210> 11 <211> 27 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1)..(27) <223> primer <400> 11 cagaccatgg ccaacgttct gaaattc 27 <210> 12 <211> 51 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>

<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1)..(51) <223> primer <400> 12 atccgtctag agctccaagc ttgccttgcg gctggctttt tccagcatgc g 51 <210> 13 <211> 15 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1)..(15) <223> primer <400> 13 cgttcaccga caaac 15 <210> 14 <211> 18 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1)..(18) <223> primer <400> 14 ttcgttccac tgagcgtc 18 <210> 15 <211> 33 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1) . . (33) <223> primer <400> 15 gtggaattcg ccggccaagc ggcgtcggct tga 33 <210> 16 <211> 30 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1)..(30) <223> primer <400> 16 ccggatccgt gcacagcact tgttgtagaa 30 <210> 17 <211> 31 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1) . . (31) <223> primer <400> 17 ggcaagcttg ggctccatcg gtgcagcaag c 31 <210> 18 <211> 25 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1)..(25) <223> primer <400> 18 ggctctagag ggaaacacat ctgcc 25 <210> 19 <211> 127 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 19 Asp Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Gln Ala Gly Gly Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Thr Ala Pro Gly Phe Thr Ser Asn Ser Cys Gly Met Asp Trp Tyr Arg Gln Ala Ala Gly Lys Gln Arg Glu Trp Val Ser Ser Ile Ser Thr Asp Gly Ser Thr Ser Tyr Ala Asp Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Lys Asp Lys Ala Lys Asp Thr Val Tyr Leu Gln Met Asn Ser Leu Lys Pro Glu Asp Thr Ala Ile Tyr Tyr Cys Ala Ala Ala Arg Ser Pro Val Ala Cys~Ala Ser Trp Arg Arg Ala Gly Lys Asp Tyr Ala Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 20 <211> 129 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 20 Gln Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Xaa Xaa Xaa Val Gln Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Ser Cys Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Pro Gly Lys Glu Arg Glu Phe Val Ser Ser Val Arg Arg Tyr Gly Ser Thr Asn Tyr Ala Asp Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Gln Asp Asn Ala Lys Asn Thr Val Tyr Leu Gln Met Asn Ser Leu Lys Ala Asp Asp Thr Ala Ile Tyr Tyr Cys Lys Ala Val Cys Ser Val Arg Asp Arg Ser Asp Arg Tyr Pro Phe Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 21 <211> 124 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 21 Gly His Gly Ala Gly Ile Gly Arg Glu Ser Arg Gly Cys Ala Gly Gly Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Ile Tyr Ser Gly Gly Trp Tyr Asn Asp Leu Cys Ile Gly Trp Phe Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Glu Arg Glu Gly Val Ala Ala Ile Lys Arg Gly Asp Gly Met Thr Tyr Tyr Ala Asp Ser Val Lys Ser Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg Val Asn Ala Glu Asn Thr Val Tyr Leu Thr Leu Asn Ser Leu Lys Pro Asp Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys Ala Ala Gly Asp Tyr Ser Cys Gly Tyr Cys Tyr Cys Lys Gly Phe Asp Tyr Trp Ser Arg Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 22 <211> 128 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 22 Gln Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Gln Ala Gly Gly Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Ala Val Ser Gly Tyr Thr His Ser Asn Tyr Tyr Met Gly Trp Phe Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Glu Arg Glu Gly Val Ala Ala Ile Arg Ser Gly Ser Ala Ser Ala His Tyr Ala Asp Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Gln Asp Asn Ala Lys Asn Thr Val Tyr Leu Leu Met Thr Ser Leu Lys Pro Glu Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys Ala Thr Arg Asp Phe Ser Val Tyr Phe Ala Tyr Asp Pro Leu Asp Pro Asp Ala Tyr Arg Phe Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 23 <211> 133 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 23 Gln Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Leu Val Glu Thr Gly Gly Ser Leu Lys Leu Ala Cys Val Gly Asp Phe Glu Ser Asp Ala Ser Gly Tyr Ser Phe Ala Asp Ser Glu Met Gly Trp Tyr Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Asn Glu Cys Ala Met Val Ser Thr Ile Thr Val Asp Asp Arg Val Glu Tyr Gly Asp Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser His Asp Thr Leu Thr Gly Thr Val Tyr Leu Asp Met Asp Asn Leu Ala Pro Glu Asp Thr Ala Ile Tyr Tyr Cys Thr Thr Ser Tyr Ser Pro Tyr Val Gly Cys Arg Pro Glu Asp Asp Tyr Arg His Leu Glu Ile Trp Gly Arg Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 24 <211> 123 <212> PRT
<213> Camelus dromedarius <400> 24 Asp Val Gln Leu Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Gln Ala Gly Gly Ser Leu Arg Leu Ser Cys Thr Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Asp Asp Phe Glu Met Gly Trp Tyr His Gln Ala Pro Gly Asn Glu Arg Glu Leu Val Ser Thr Ile Ser Ser Asp Gly Asp Thr Ser Tyr Thr Glu Ser Val Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Met Ser Arg Asp Asn Ala Lys Lys Thr Val Tyr Pro Gln Met Asp Ser Leu Lys Pro Glu Asp Thr Gly Met Tyr Tyr Cys Ala Ala Val Glu Asp Thr Gly Ser Gly Gly Leu Ile Asn Ala Leu Gly Ala Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Gln Val Thr Val Ser Ser <210> 25 <211> 41 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> mist feature <222> (1)..(41) <223> primer <400> 25 agagagccat ggcaaaggca accgaacaaa acgacaagct c 41 <210> 26 <211> 40 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1) . . (40) <223> primer <400> 26 cggaattcga acctcctgcc tctgcggccg cttttgctgc 40 <210> 27 <211> 36 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1) . . (36) <223> primer <400> 27 cggaattcaa gctttgctca cccagaaacg ctggtg 36 <210> 28 <211> 35 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence:
oligonucleotide <220>
<221> misc feature <222> (1)..(35) <223> primer <400> 28 ctgctctaga cagttaccaa tgcttaatca gtgag 35

Claims (29)

Claims

1. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid capable of entering a host cell by binding of its artificial ligand to an artificial receptor present on said host cell.

2. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1, carrying a nucleotide sequence encoding an artificial ligand, in condition enabling expression of said ligand at the surface of the bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid.

3. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1 or 2, in which the artificial receptor is an endogenous cell wall protein of the host cell.

4. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1 or 2, in which the artificial receptor is a fusion protein whereby the protein sequence or region of said fusion protein, involved in the binding of the receptor with said bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid is free of peptide sequences having 10 or more contiguous amino acid residues involved in the wild type bacteriophage-host cell interaction.

5. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1-3, where the binding is mediated by an antigen - antibody reaction.

6. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1-4, in which the said bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid is lytic.

7. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 6, in which the entering in the host cell of said bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid is inducing expression of barnase in the host cell.

8. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1-7, where the bacteriophage is M13.

9. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 8, where the artificial ligand is a plll fusion protein.

10. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 9, in which the phagemid is a pK7C3 derived vector

11. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim anyone of claims 1 to 4, in which the fusion protein is an pOrpl or a ToIA fusion protein.

12. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 11, in which the host cell is transformed with an ptrc-Oprl derived vector.

13. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 12, in which the phagemid is a pK7C3 derived vector.

14. Genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 5, in which the antibody is a camelid derived antibody, or is a functional fragment thereof, including a fragment comprising all or part of the VHH
chain of a camelid heavy chain antibody.

15. Use of a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1-14 to detect and/or eliminate a specific bacterial population.

16. Use of a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim 1-14 to detect a artificial receptor- artificial ligand interaction.

17. Use of a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to claim to screen an antigen and/or antibody library.

18. Method for selecting artificial receptor - artificial ligand interactions, comprising:
growing a host cell or a mixture of host cells displaying one or more artificial receptors, contacting said host cell or said mixture with a genetically modified bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid or a mixture of genetically modified bacteriophages, pseudovirions or phagemids with one or more artificial ligands, ~ selecting those cells that have been entered by one or more bacteriophages, pseudovirion of phagemid.

19. Method for selecting artificial ligand-artificial receptor interactions according to claim 18, in which the host cell is transformed with an ptrc-Oprl derived vector.

20. Method for selecting artificial ligand-artificial receptor interactions according to claim 18 or 19, in which the phagemid is a pK7C3 derived vector.

21. Genetically modified host cell, carrying a nucleotide sequence encoding an artificial receptor in conditions enabling that the artificial receptor be expressed at the surface of the host cell, said host cell being further transformed with a nucleotide sequence encoding said artificial ligand whereby said nucleotide sequence encoding the ligand entered the host cell as a consequence of the interaction between said artificial ligand and a protein sequence or region on said artificial receptor.

22. Genetically modified host cell according to claim 21, wherein the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial receptor and/or the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial ligand are not known.

23. Genetically modified host cell according to claim 21 or 22, which is a gram-negative bacterium, especially an E coli cell of the F strain.

24. Genetically modified host cell according to any of claims 21 to 23, wherein the nucleotide sequences of the artificial receptor and the nucleotide sequence for the artificial ligand are respectively coding sequences of an antibody or a functional fragment thereof and coding sequence of an antigen, or are respectively coding sequences of an antigen and coding sequence of antibody or a functional fragment thereof.

25. Genetically modified host cell according to claim 24, wherein the functional antibody fragment is a VHH fragment of a camelid antibody or a functional portion of said VHH.

26. Genetically modified host cell according to anyone of claims 21 to 25, wherein the nucleotide sequence encoding the artificial receptor comprises a sequence encoding Oprl or ToIA or a part of Oprl or a part of ToIA sufficient to enable the exposure, at the surface of the host cell, of a protein sequence or region capable of interacting with the artificial ligand.

27. A kit comprising a genetically modified host cell according to anyone of claims 21 to 26 bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid according to anyone of claims 1 to 20, or comprising a host cell and/or a bacteriophage, pseudovirion or phagemid and/or a cloning vector enabling the construction of said genetically modified host cell according to anyone of claims 21 to 26.

28. A kit according to claim 27 for in vivo panning of antibody or antibody fragment library, or antigenic sequences library.

29. A kit according to claim 27 or 28, for the simultaneous in vivo panning of both an antibody fragment library, and an antigenic sequences library.