US20100177731A1 - Reverse link rate and stability control - Google Patents

Reverse link rate and stability control Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100177731A1
US20100177731A1 US12/731,841 US73184110A US2010177731A1 US 20100177731 A1 US20100177731 A1 US 20100177731A1 US 73184110 A US73184110 A US 73184110A US 2010177731 A1 US2010177731 A1 US 2010177731A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sector
connections
rate limit
effective number
access terminal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/731,841
Inventor
Satish Ananthaiyer
Sae-Young Chung
Sepehr Mehrabanzad
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ericsson EVDO Inc
Original Assignee
Airvana Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airvana Inc filed Critical Airvana Inc
Priority to US12/731,841 priority Critical patent/US20100177731A1/en
Assigned to AIRVANA, INC. reassignment AIRVANA, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MEHRABANZAD, SEPEHR, ANANTHAIYER, SATISH, CHUNG, SAE-YOUNG
Assigned to WILMINGTON TRUST FSB reassignment WILMINGTON TRUST FSB PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: AIRVANA, INC.
Publication of US20100177731A1 publication Critical patent/US20100177731A1/en
Assigned to AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. reassignment AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AIRVANA, INC.
Assigned to SOCIETE GENERALE reassignment SOCIETE GENERALE SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC.
Assigned to AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC. reassignment AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 024917/0171 Assignors: SOCIETE GENERALE
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/16Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H04W28/18Negotiating wireless communication parameters
    • H04W28/22Negotiating communication rate

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to control of reverse link rate and stability in a multi-user wireless communication system.
  • a radio access network such as a cellular network
  • One way in which a sector can become overloaded is if many access terminals (e.g., cellular devices) in a sector transmit at high data rates, which increases the transmission power.
  • the 1 ⁇ EV-DO protocol provides mechanisms for measuring sector load (referred to as a “rise-over thermal (ROT)” measurement) and reducing the transmission rates of ATs in the sector by transmitting a bit (referred to as the “reverse activity bit”) to ATs in a sector that is becoming overloaded.
  • ROT measurement may not always be not available, and, in these cases, a radio access network may fail to detect and mitigate overloading of a sector.
  • the invention features a method for controlling the rate of transmission of an access terminal in a radio access network (e.g., a 1 ⁇ EV-DO network) that includes, for one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection, determining a number of connections for the sector, and setting a rate limit for the access terminal based on one or more of the determined number of connections.
  • a radio access network e.g., a 1 ⁇ EV-DO network
  • Implementations may include one or more of the following features.
  • the method may include determining a number of connections for each sector in which the access terminal has a connection (e.g., sectors in which an AT is in soft or softer handoff).
  • the method may also include determining a number of connections for a subset of sectors in which the access terminal has a connection (e.g., only those sectors in which the access terminal has a connection serviced by a common radio node).
  • Setting a rate limit for the access terminal based on one or more of the determined number of connections may include using a rate-limit table to set a rate limit.
  • a rate limit table may, for example, assign a first rate limit if a number of connections determined for the access terminal is within a first range of values, and a second rate limit if a number of connections determined for the access terminal is within a second range of values. If a number of connections is determined for multiple sectors in which an AT has a connection, the method may set a rate based on an determined number of connections for a sector having a value equal to or greater than any other effective number of connections determined for other sectors.
  • the method may including changing the way in which a number of connections is determined for a sector (e.g., applying different weights to connections in a sector) and/or a rate limit table used to set rate limitations based on the way in which the radio access network performs its RA bit estimation. If it uses ROT measurement to set or clear RA bits for ATs, the method may use one rate limit scheme, whereas if ROT measurement is not available (and the system uses, for example, post-automatic gain control-ROT estimation), then the method may use a different rate limit scheme.
  • the method may include transmitting a rate limit message via a broadcast message or a unicast message to the access terminal.
  • the method may also include transmitting to the access terminal a rate limit message immediately upon the access terminal establishing a connection in a sector.
  • the invention features a radio node configured to transmit radio signals to and receive radio signals from an access terminal having one or more connections in a group of one or more sectors of a radio access network.
  • the radio node includes a processor and a medium bearing instructions to cause the processor to determine a number of connections for one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection and set a rate limit for the access terminal based on at least one of the determined number of connections.
  • the radio node may be configured to determine a number of connections for each of sector in the group of sectors in which the access terminal has a connection. If the radio node determines multiple numbers of connections for sectors in which the access terminal has a connection, the radio node may be configured to base a rate limit on the greatest determined number of connections.
  • the radio node may be configured to receive (e.g., from another radio node or from an radio network controller) an effective number of connections for other sectors in the radio access network in which the access terminal has a connection but is not in the group of sectors serviced by the radio node.
  • the radio node may be configured to determine an effective number of connections by, for example, weighting characteristics of each connection in a sector and summing the weighed connections.
  • the radio node may be configured to set a rate limit based on a rate limit table that, for example, specifies a first rate limit if a number of effective connections determined for the access terminal is within a first range of values and specifies a second rate limit if a number of effective connections determined for the access terminal is within a second range of values.
  • the radio node may also be configured to transmit a rate limit to the access terminal (e.g., via a broadcast or unicast message).
  • the invention features a system for controlling the rate of transmission of an access terminal in a radio access network that includes a processor and a medium bearing instructions to cause the processor to determine an effective number of connections for one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection and set a rate limit for the access terminal based on at least one determined effective number of connections.
  • the processor of the system may be part of a radio network controller.
  • the instructions may be written to cause the processor to determine a number of connections for each of sector in which the access terminal has a connection. If the access terminal has connections in multiple sectors, the radio network controller may set a rate limit based on the sector with the greatest number of connections.
  • the processor of the system may be part of a radio node that services a group of sectors.
  • the instructions may be written to determine a number of connections for each of the sectors in the group of sectors in which the AT has a connection.
  • the radio node may be configured to set a rate limit based only on this determination.
  • the radio node may also be configured to receive information (e.g., from an RNC or from other RNs) on numbers of connections in sectors other than the group of sectors with which the AT has a connection and may be configured to set a rate limit based also on these numbers of connections.
  • the system may also include a radio network controller that is configured to determine a number of connections for sectors outside the RN's group of sectors with which the AT has a connection.
  • the radio network controller may be configured to also send the AT a rate limit message based on these numbers.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a radio access network.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of several cells and sectors in a radio access network.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of a radio node.
  • FIGS. 4-7 are diagrams of radio access networks.
  • a radio access network (RAN) 20 uses the first evolution data-only (1 ⁇ EV-DO) protocol to transmit data packets between an AT, such as laptop 24 and personal data assistant (PDA) 26 , and an external network such as the Internet 40 .
  • the 1 ⁇ EV-DO protocol has been standardized by the Telecommunication Industry Association (TIA) as TIA/EIA/IS-856, “CDMA2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification”, 3GPP2 C.S0024-0, Version 4.0, Oct. 25, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the radio access network 20 which may cover a large service area, includes one or more Access Sub-Networks (ASN's), e.g., ASN 22 , each anchored by a Radio Network Controller (RNC) 34 communicating with several Radio Nodes (RN's) 10 , 12 , 14 using a private or public IP backhaul network 32 .
  • ASN's Access Sub-Networks
  • RNC Radio Network Controller
  • RN's Radio Nodes
  • Each RN may support multiple sectors, such as the three sectors shown in FIG. 1 , with each sector covering a certain cell area around the RN.
  • ASN 22 is connected over a public or private IP network 36 to one or more Packet Data Serving Node's (PDSN's), e.g., PDSN 38 .
  • PDSN Packet Data Serving Node's
  • the PDSN receives and transmits data packets (e.g., voice over IP packets) to a server 42 via the Internet 40 .
  • data packets e.g., voice over IP packets
  • server 42 via the Internet 40 .
  • the functions of a PDSN and an RNC are combined into a single device.
  • Each AT is in communication with a radio node, e.g., RN 10 , via an air link 28 a , 28 b .
  • An air link comprises a forward link, which carries data transmitted from an RN to an AT, and a reverse link, which carries data transmitted from the AT to the RN.
  • a forward link which carries data transmitted from an RN to an AT
  • a reverse link which carries data transmitted from the AT to the RN.
  • a geographic area covered by radio access network 20 (shown in FIG. 1 ) is divided into multiple cells 1 , 2 , and 3 , which are each further divided into three sectors A, B, and C.
  • Each cell includes a radio node (RN) 10 , 12 , 14 that communicates with access terminals (e.g., cellular telephones) (not shown) located within each RN's cell.
  • access terminals e.g., cellular telephones
  • Each radio node uses a directional antenna (not shown) appropriately positioned in each sector to send data to and receive data from ATs located in the sectors.
  • each radio node e.g., RN 10
  • each radio node includes a radio interface 11 and modem 15 for transmitting radio signals to and receiving radio signals from ATs in a sector.
  • a set of digital-to-analog and analog-to-digital converters 13 , 17 converts the data exchanged between the radio interface 11 and the modem 15 .
  • the radio node also includes network interface 19 for exchanging digital data between the RN and an RNC, e.g., RNC 34 , via a backhaul network (e.g., backhaul network 32 shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • the pole capacity is the theoretical capacity of access terminals supported by a radio node.
  • the pole capacity of an RN is a function of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) necessary to achieve a certain aggregate data rate with a certain aggregate error rate within a cell.
  • SNR signal-to-noise ratio
  • Pole capacity is a theoretical maximum capacity of a cell and it is often advisable to design radio access networks in which the number of active ATs within a cell is limited to some percentage of the pole capacity, e.g., 50% to 75% of the pole capacity, which corresponds to an Rise-Over-Thermal (ROT) of 3 or 6 dB respectively.
  • ROT Rise-Over-Thermal
  • a radio node such as RN 10 shown in FIGS. 1-3 , can determine whether one of its sectors is becoming overloaded by measuring the rise over thermal (ROT) value of the sector.
  • the radio node can determine the ROT of a sector by measuring the thermal noise at the radio receiver in the sector when all ATs in the sector are silent.
  • IS-856 provides a mechanism in which a radio node and ATs in a sector served by the radio node can set up a time and duration during which ATs in the sector will remain silent.
  • a radio node When a radio node is able to measure sector load using ROT, it can control load on the sector by setting (or clearing) the reverse activity (RA) bit in the reverse activity channel on the forward link. More particularly, the radio node compares the ROT value with a predetermined threshold, which is referred to as the RA bit threshold.
  • the RA bit threshold corresponds to some percentage of nominal sector loading (typical values are about 50 to 60% of nominal sector loading). If the ROT value is above the RA bit threshold, then the radio node sets the RA bit, otherwise the radio node clears the bit.
  • the RN transmits an RA bit every RAB length slots over the RA medium access control (MAC) channel (which is a component channel of the reverse activity channel).
  • MAC medium access control
  • the AT When an AT receives data on an MAC channel with the RA bit set, the AT becomes aware that the loaded and executes a “coin-flip” algorithm to determine whether to freeze or reduce its transmit rate. If the coin-flip has a first outcome, the AT freezes its transmit rate, if the coin-flip has a second outcome, the AT decreases its rate from its current rate to the next lowest rate defined by IS-856. By reducing the rate at which ATs transmit on the reverse link, ATs transmit at less power and cause less interference in the sector, which decreases the ATs usage of the sector's capacity.
  • MAC medium access control
  • the RN's radio interface is not available, and, as a result, sector load cannot be measured using ROT.
  • sector load is measured by the RN's modem using post-Automatic Gain Control (AGC)-ROT estimation.
  • a post-AGC-ROT estimate is not as accurate as a ROT measure because it typically does not account for interference from ATs that do not have active connections on that sector (interference generated by other sectors).
  • the RA bit may not get set when a sector is becoming overloaded. If the RA bit is not properly set, ATs in the sector are free to transmit at higher rates (and thus also higher powers), which may eventually lead to an overpowering of the reverse link.
  • the problem is exacerbated because as the number of active connections grows, the effective SNR of all ATs denigrates until eventually the ATs in the sector lose the reverse link.
  • RAN 20 also employs a reverse rate and stability control algorithm that allows it to variably control the data rate of the reverse link of ATs in a sector.
  • the reverse rate and stability control algorithm includes two basic components: (i) a generalized rate-weighting algorithm by which a RAN determines the “effective number of connections” in one or more sectors with which an AT has a connection, and (ii) a maximum rate limit table (MRLT), which dictates a rate limit for an AT based on the determined effective number of connections.
  • MRLT maximum rate limit table
  • the RAN sets a rate limit for an AT having connections in multiple sectors based on the sector with the largest effective number of connections. For example, if an AT has a connection in sector “A” having an effective number of connections equaling 10 and sector “B” having an effective number of connections equaling 20, the RAN sets a rate limit for that AT based on an effective number of connections of 20.
  • the generalized rate-weighting algorithm assigns weights to connections in a sector to determine an effective number of connections in the sector. If an AT is in softer handoff and has connections in two or more sectors serviced by the same RN, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm is applied to each of the sectors with which the AT has a connection. In some implementations, if the AT is in soft handoff and has connection in two or more sectors serviced by different RNs, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm is applied to each of the sectors with which the AT has a connection. As mentioned above, if an AT has connections in multiple sectors, the RAN may base the ATs rate limit on the largest effective number of connections of the sectors with which the AT has a connection.
  • the generalized rate-weighting algorithm can be programmed to weight connections differently based on their transmit rate.
  • the soft/softer handoff factor of a connection transmitting at one rate can be weighted differently than the soft/softer handoff factor of another connection transmitting at a different rate.
  • the weighted connections in the sector are summed to obtain the effective number of connections in the sector.
  • the generalized weight-rating algorithm is programmed according to Table I.
  • the generalized rate-weighting algorithm has been programmed only to consider whether a connection has data to send and ignores other characteristics of a connection.
  • the generalized rate-weighting algorithm ignores connections that are transmitting at the lowest 1 ⁇ EV-DO rate of 9.6 Kbps.
  • the generalized rate-weighting algorithm (as programmed according to Table I) will determine that there are 3 effective number of connections in the sector.
  • the RAN then sets a maximum rate limit for ATs in the sector based on the effective number of connections. If an AT has multiple connections for which an effective number of connections has been determined, the RAN may set the rate limit based on the largest effective number of connections of the sector with which the AT has a connection. In some implementations, the RAN uses the maximum rate limit table shown in Table II to set a maximum rate limit for the sector.
  • the RAN permits the ATs to transmit at the maximum 1 ⁇ EV-DO rate of 153.6 Kbps. If the effective number of connections is between 8 and 59, the RAN limits the ATs in the sector to transmit at the second-highest 1 ⁇ EV-DO rate of 76.8 Kbps.
  • the current iteration of 1 ⁇ EV-DO limits the number of connection in a sector to 59, which is why the table does not account for situations where the effective number of connections is over 59.
  • future iterations of 1 ⁇ EV-DO may increase the maximum number of connections in a sector, in which case, the rate limit table would be extended. Additionally, some implementations may use other rate limit tables to limit transmit rates of ATs based on characteristics of a sector (e.g., the hardware capabilities of a sector, the presence of objects like buildings that cause interference in a sector, etc.).
  • connection characteristics may be used any one or a combination of the connection characteristics described above to determine an effective number of connections.
  • weighting of connection characteristics can vary depending on the transmit rate of the connection.
  • the RAN can be configured to transmit rate limit messages by way of unicast or broadcast messaging.
  • the RAN transmits a rate limit message to all ATs in a sector over the control channel on the forward link.
  • the RAN transmits a rate limit message sent to individual ATs over the forward traffic channel on the forward link.
  • an AT When an AT establishes a connection with a sector, it does so at the lowest rate, i.e., 9.6 Kbps, and will remain at this rate until it receives a rate limit message. Because it may take some time before the RAN transmits a rate limit message (e.g., a RAN may be configured to periodically broadcast rate limit messages in a sector), in some implementations the RAN is configured to send a rate limit message at the maximum rate of 153.6 Kbps immediately after a new connection is established to prevent an AT from needlessly remaining at a low transmit rate while waiting for a first rate limit message.
  • a rate limit message e.g., a RAN may be configured to periodically broadcast rate limit messages in a sector
  • a RAN 50 includes an RNC 52 in communication with two RNs 54 a , 54 b over a backhaul network 56 .
  • each RN serves a single sector.
  • Each RN includes an RA bit estimation algorithm 60 a , 60 b , which performs ROT measurements or, if not available, provides a post-AGC-ROT estimation, to set or clear the RA bit.
  • the RNs transmit the RA bit 62 on the MAC channel to ATs 58 in the sector.
  • RNC 52 includes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm 63 , which, as described above, uses the generalized rate-weighting algorithm to determine an effective number of connections for an AT over ALL sectors that the AT is in handoff with and then uses a rate limit table (e.g., Table II above) to set rate limits for the AT.
  • a rate limit table e.g., Table II above
  • Rate limit messages 64 can be transmitted to ATs in the sector either via unicast or broadcast messaging. Unicast messages are reliable, but an individual message needs to be sent to each AT. This may increase the processing load on the RNC and signaling traffic between the RAN and the AT. If unicast messaging is used, the rate limit message can be transmitted either periodically or whenever there is a change in the rate limit.
  • Broadcast messages are best effort (and thus not as reliable as unicast messages).
  • a broadcast rate limit message can be a single message per sector transmitted over the control channel of the sector.
  • broadcasting conserves RNC processing resources and signaling bandwidth between AN and AT.
  • a broadcast rate limit message can be transmitted either periodically or whenever there is a change in the rate limit. It should be noted that broadcast rate limit messages normally needs to be transmitted to the AT through its serving sector, and there can be ambiguity in choosing the serving sector when the AT is switching sectors. However, periodic broadcasted rate limit messages tend to diminish this problem.
  • rate limit information for an AT is broadcasted from all sectors in handoff with an AT targeted for a rate limit.
  • a reverse rate and stability control algorithm is implemented at the radio node.
  • each radio node 54 a , 54 b executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm 63 a , 63 b in addition to the RA bit estimation algorithm 60 a , 60 b .
  • the effective number of connections for the sector(s) with which the AT has a connection but are outside the service area of RN 54 a are provided by the RNC that services the sector(s).
  • the effective number of connections for sector(s) with which the AT has a connection but are outside the service area of the RN executing the reverse rate and stability control algorithm are provided directly by the appropriate RN via inter-RN messaging.
  • an RN can transmit rate limit messages to ATs via either broadcast or unicast messaging.
  • a reverse rate and stability control algorithm executed for a particular AT in all of the sectors in which the AT has a connection. This can be considered an optimal approach. In some implementations, however, determination of the effective number of connections is performed only on a subset of the sectors with which an AT has a connection. For example, an RN may determine an effective number of connections for the sectors with an AT has a connection AND are serviced by the RN. Thus, the RAN would not determine an effective number of connections for sectors in which the AT is in soft handoff.
  • each RN 54 a , 54 b executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm without receiving information about a number of connections in other sectors that an AT, e.g., AT 58 , may be in soft handoff with.
  • rate limit messages may be transmitted either via unicast or broadcast messaging.
  • each of the RNs 54 a , 54 b executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm over ALL sectors for connections that are not in soft handoff, i.e., only the sectors within the radio node ( 54 a or 54 b ) are analyzed.
  • the RNC 52 executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm over ALL sectors for connections that are in soft handoff with all the sectors being analyzed. If the connection is not in handoff or in softer handoff, the unicast or broadcast rate limit messages are transmitted from the radio node ( 54 a or 54 b ) itself. If the connection is in soft handoff, then the unicast or broadcast rate limit messages are transmitted from the RNC 52 .
  • rate limit messages can be transmitted to affected ATs either view unicast or broadcast messaging.
  • ATs that are not in soft or softer handoff receive rate limit messages via broadcast messaging from the radio node in which they have a connection
  • ATs that are in soft or soft-softer handoff receive unicast or broadcast rate limit messages from the RNC.
  • the RN transmits a broadcast rate limit message corresponding to no handoff that will be overridden by the unicast message transmitted from the RNC.
  • connections in soft-softer handoff the RN transmits a broadcast rate limit message corresponding to softer handoff that will be overridden by the unicast message transmitted from the RNC.
  • the simulation showed an improved reverse link sector throughput while still ensuring stability of the reverse link versus an implementation in which all ATs were limited to a transmit rate of 38.4 Kbps.
  • Embodiments on existing systems select a conservative rate limit (such as 38.4 Kbps) to maintain reverse link stability.
  • the simulations were based on the Strawman models provided the 3GPP2 standard bodies (3GPP2-1 ⁇ EV-DO Evaluation Methodology (V1.3)) for wireless network simulation. Simulation results for a heavily loaded sector having 18 connections are shown in Table III.
  • the system may use different rate weightings in the generalized rate-weighting algorithm may differ depending on the ROT/post-AGC-ROT estimation method used.
  • the system may use different rate limit tables (e.g., Table II above) depending on the ROT/post-AGC-ROT estimation method used. For example, if the system uses highly accurate RA bit estimation method (e.g., ROT measurement), the system may employ one weight limit table, whereas if the system uses a less accurate RA bit estimation method (e.g., a post-AGC-estimation ROT method), it may switch to a more conservative rate limit table.

Abstract

In a radio access network, the reverse link rate of an access terminal is controlled and stabilized by determining a number of connections in one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection and setting a rate limit based on at least one of the determined number of connections. The number of connections can be determined for each sector in which the access terminal has a connection or for some subset of these sectors. If the number of connections is determined for more than one sector, the radio access network may limit the reverse link rate based on the sector having the greatest number of connections.

Description

    FIELD
  • This disclosure relates to control of reverse link rate and stability in a multi-user wireless communication system.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In a radio access network, such as a cellular network, it is often important to ensure that sectors in the network do not become overloaded. One way in which a sector can become overloaded is if many access terminals (e.g., cellular devices) in a sector transmit at high data rates, which increases the transmission power. In a first Evolution Data-Only (1×EV-DO) network, the 1×EV-DO protocol provides mechanisms for measuring sector load (referred to as a “rise-over thermal (ROT)” measurement) and reducing the transmission rates of ATs in the sector by transmitting a bit (referred to as the “reverse activity bit”) to ATs in a sector that is becoming overloaded. However, ROT measurement may not always be not available, and, in these cases, a radio access network may fail to detect and mitigate overloading of a sector.
  • SUMMARY
  • In one aspect, the invention features a method for controlling the rate of transmission of an access terminal in a radio access network (e.g., a 1×EV-DO network) that includes, for one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection, determining a number of connections for the sector, and setting a rate limit for the access terminal based on one or more of the determined number of connections.
  • Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The method may include determining a number of connections for each sector in which the access terminal has a connection (e.g., sectors in which an AT is in soft or softer handoff). The method may also include determining a number of connections for a subset of sectors in which the access terminal has a connection (e.g., only those sectors in which the access terminal has a connection serviced by a common radio node).
  • Determination of a number of connections may include determining an effective number of connections for a sector. Determining an effective number of connections for a sector may include, for each connection in a sector, applying a weight to one or more characteristics of the connection to determine a weighted connection, and summing the weighed connections.
  • Setting a rate limit for the access terminal based on one or more of the determined number of connections may include using a rate-limit table to set a rate limit. A rate limit table may, for example, assign a first rate limit if a number of connections determined for the access terminal is within a first range of values, and a second rate limit if a number of connections determined for the access terminal is within a second range of values. If a number of connections is determined for multiple sectors in which an AT has a connection, the method may set a rate based on an determined number of connections for a sector having a value equal to or greater than any other effective number of connections determined for other sectors.
  • The method may including changing the way in which a number of connections is determined for a sector (e.g., applying different weights to connections in a sector) and/or a rate limit table used to set rate limitations based on the way in which the radio access network performs its RA bit estimation. If it uses ROT measurement to set or clear RA bits for ATs, the method may use one rate limit scheme, whereas if ROT measurement is not available (and the system uses, for example, post-automatic gain control-ROT estimation), then the method may use a different rate limit scheme. The method may include transmitting a rate limit message via a broadcast message or a unicast message to the access terminal. The method may also include transmitting to the access terminal a rate limit message immediately upon the access terminal establishing a connection in a sector.
  • In another aspect, the invention features a radio node configured to transmit radio signals to and receive radio signals from an access terminal having one or more connections in a group of one or more sectors of a radio access network. The radio node includes a processor and a medium bearing instructions to cause the processor to determine a number of connections for one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection and set a rate limit for the access terminal based on at least one of the determined number of connections.
  • Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The radio node may be configured to determine a number of connections for each of sector in the group of sectors in which the access terminal has a connection. If the radio node determines multiple numbers of connections for sectors in which the access terminal has a connection, the radio node may be configured to base a rate limit on the greatest determined number of connections.
  • The radio node may be configured to receive (e.g., from another radio node or from an radio network controller) an effective number of connections for other sectors in the radio access network in which the access terminal has a connection but is not in the group of sectors serviced by the radio node.
  • The radio node may be configured to determine an effective number of connections by, for example, weighting characteristics of each connection in a sector and summing the weighed connections. The radio node may be configured to set a rate limit based on a rate limit table that, for example, specifies a first rate limit if a number of effective connections determined for the access terminal is within a first range of values and specifies a second rate limit if a number of effective connections determined for the access terminal is within a second range of values. The radio node may also be configured to transmit a rate limit to the access terminal (e.g., via a broadcast or unicast message).
  • In another aspect, the invention features a system for controlling the rate of transmission of an access terminal in a radio access network that includes a processor and a medium bearing instructions to cause the processor to determine an effective number of connections for one or more sectors in which the access terminal has a connection and set a rate limit for the access terminal based on at least one determined effective number of connections.
  • In one specific implementation, the processor of the system may be part of a radio network controller. In cases where the processor is part of a radio network controller, the instructions may be written to cause the processor to determine a number of connections for each of sector in which the access terminal has a connection. If the access terminal has connections in multiple sectors, the radio network controller may set a rate limit based on the sector with the greatest number of connections.
  • In another particular implementation, the processor of the system may be part of a radio node that services a group of sectors. The instructions may be written to determine a number of connections for each of the sectors in the group of sectors in which the AT has a connection. The radio node may be configured to set a rate limit based only on this determination. The radio node may also be configured to receive information (e.g., from an RNC or from other RNs) on numbers of connections in sectors other than the group of sectors with which the AT has a connection and may be configured to set a rate limit based also on these numbers of connections. The system may also include a radio network controller that is configured to determine a number of connections for sectors outside the RN's group of sectors with which the AT has a connection. The radio network controller may be configured to also send the AT a rate limit message based on these numbers.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a radio access network.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of several cells and sectors in a radio access network.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of a radio node.
  • FIGS. 4-7 are diagrams of radio access networks.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring to FIG. 1, a radio access network (RAN) 20 uses the first evolution data-only (1× EV-DO) protocol to transmit data packets between an AT, such as laptop 24 and personal data assistant (PDA) 26, and an external network such as the Internet 40. The 1×EV-DO protocol has been standardized by the Telecommunication Industry Association (TIA) as TIA/EIA/IS-856, “CDMA2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification”, 3GPP2 C.S0024-0, Version 4.0, Oct. 25, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • The radio access network 20, which may cover a large service area, includes one or more Access Sub-Networks (ASN's), e.g., ASN 22, each anchored by a Radio Network Controller (RNC) 34 communicating with several Radio Nodes (RN's) 10, 12, 14 using a private or public IP backhaul network 32. Each RN may support multiple sectors, such as the three sectors shown in FIG. 1, with each sector covering a certain cell area around the RN.
  • ASN 22 is connected over a public or private IP network 36 to one or more Packet Data Serving Node's (PDSN's), e.g., PDSN 38. The PDSN, in turn, receives and transmits data packets (e.g., voice over IP packets) to a server 42 via the Internet 40. In some implementations, the functions of a PDSN and an RNC are combined into a single device.
  • Each AT is in communication with a radio node, e.g., RN 10, via an air link 28 a, 28 b. An air link comprises a forward link, which carries data transmitted from an RN to an AT, and a reverse link, which carries data transmitted from the AT to the RN. As an AT moves from one sector to another sector serviced by the same RN, it undergoes a “softer handoff” between the sectors. Similarly, when an AT moves from one sector to another sector serviced by different RNs, it undergoes a “soft handoff” between the RNs. When an AT is in soft or softer handoff, it will have connections in multiple sectors.
  • As shown in FIG. 2, a geographic area covered by radio access network 20 (shown in FIG. 1) is divided into multiple cells 1, 2, and 3, which are each further divided into three sectors A, B, and C. Each cell includes a radio node (RN) 10, 12, 14 that communicates with access terminals (e.g., cellular telephones) (not shown) located within each RN's cell. Each radio node uses a directional antenna (not shown) appropriately positioned in each sector to send data to and receive data from ATs located in the sectors.
  • As shown in FIG. 3, each radio node, e.g., RN 10, includes a radio interface 11 and modem 15 for transmitting radio signals to and receiving radio signals from ATs in a sector. A set of digital-to-analog and analog-to- digital converters 13, 17 converts the data exchanged between the radio interface 11 and the modem 15. The radio node also includes network interface 19 for exchanging digital data between the RN and an RNC, e.g., RNC 34, via a backhaul network (e.g., backhaul network 32 shown in FIG. 1).
  • The pole capacity is the theoretical capacity of access terminals supported by a radio node. The pole capacity of an RN is a function of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) necessary to achieve a certain aggregate data rate with a certain aggregate error rate within a cell. Pole capacity is a theoretical maximum capacity of a cell and it is often advisable to design radio access networks in which the number of active ATs within a cell is limited to some percentage of the pole capacity, e.g., 50% to 75% of the pole capacity, which corresponds to an Rise-Over-Thermal (ROT) of 3 or 6 dB respectively.
  • A radio node, such as RN 10 shown in FIGS. 1-3, can determine whether one of its sectors is becoming overloaded by measuring the rise over thermal (ROT) value of the sector. The radio node can determine the ROT of a sector by measuring the thermal noise at the radio receiver in the sector when all ATs in the sector are silent. (IS-856 provides a mechanism in which a radio node and ATs in a sector served by the radio node can set up a time and duration during which ATs in the sector will remain silent.)
  • When a radio node is able to measure sector load using ROT, it can control load on the sector by setting (or clearing) the reverse activity (RA) bit in the reverse activity channel on the forward link. More particularly, the radio node compares the ROT value with a predetermined threshold, which is referred to as the RA bit threshold. The RA bit threshold corresponds to some percentage of nominal sector loading (typical values are about 50 to 60% of nominal sector loading). If the ROT value is above the RA bit threshold, then the radio node sets the RA bit, otherwise the radio node clears the bit.
  • The RN transmits an RA bit every RAB length slots over the RA medium access control (MAC) channel (which is a component channel of the reverse activity channel). When an AT receives data on an MAC channel with the RA bit set, the AT becomes aware that the loaded and executes a “coin-flip” algorithm to determine whether to freeze or reduce its transmit rate. If the coin-flip has a first outcome, the AT freezes its transmit rate, if the coin-flip has a second outcome, the AT decreases its rate from its current rate to the next lowest rate defined by IS-856. By reducing the rate at which ATs transmit on the reverse link, ATs transmit at less power and cause less interference in the sector, which decreases the ATs usage of the sector's capacity.
  • In some cases, the RN's radio interface is not available, and, as a result, sector load cannot be measured using ROT. In this situation, sector load is measured by the RN's modem using post-Automatic Gain Control (AGC)-ROT estimation. A post-AGC-ROT estimate is not as accurate as a ROT measure because it typically does not account for interference from ATs that do not have active connections on that sector (interference generated by other sectors). Because of post-AGC-ROT estimation may be inaccurate, the RA bit may not get set when a sector is becoming overloaded. If the RA bit is not properly set, ATs in the sector are free to transmit at higher rates (and thus also higher powers), which may eventually lead to an overpowering of the reverse link. As the number of active ATs in the sector grow, the problem is exacerbated because as the number of active connections grows, the effective SNR of all ATs denigrates until eventually the ATs in the sector lose the reverse link.
  • To prevent overloading when ROT measurement is not available, RAN 20 (shown in FIG. 1) also employs a reverse rate and stability control algorithm that allows it to variably control the data rate of the reverse link of ATs in a sector. The reverse rate and stability control algorithm includes two basic components: (i) a generalized rate-weighting algorithm by which a RAN determines the “effective number of connections” in one or more sectors with which an AT has a connection, and (ii) a maximum rate limit table (MRLT), which dictates a rate limit for an AT based on the determined effective number of connections. In some implementations, the RAN sets a rate limit for an AT having connections in multiple sectors based on the sector with the largest effective number of connections. For example, if an AT has a connection in sector “A” having an effective number of connections equaling 10 and sector “B” having an effective number of connections equaling 20, the RAN sets a rate limit for that AT based on an effective number of connections of 20.
  • The generalized rate-weighting algorithm assigns weights to connections in a sector to determine an effective number of connections in the sector. If an AT is in softer handoff and has connections in two or more sectors serviced by the same RN, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm is applied to each of the sectors with which the AT has a connection. In some implementations, if the AT is in soft handoff and has connection in two or more sectors serviced by different RNs, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm is applied to each of the sectors with which the AT has a connection. As mentioned above, if an AT has connections in multiple sectors, the RAN may base the ATs rate limit on the largest effective number of connections of the sectors with which the AT has a connection.
  • The generalized rate-weighting algorithm provides systems engineers the ability to weight the following characteristics of connections in a sector:
      • a. whether a connection has data to send;
      • b. the location of the AT associated with the connection in the sector using the earliest pseudo-random noise offset (EPNO) measurement during network access (for example, an AT that is close to a sector boundary may be weighted more that ATs not close to a boundary since it is more likely to cause more interference to the neighboring sectors);
      • c. the connection's requested downlink rate (for example, an AT requesting higher downlink rate may be weighted less since it is close to the radio node and less likely to cause interference to neighboring sectors);
      • d. a soft/softer handoff factor assigned to ATs that are in soft/softer handoff (for example, an ATs in soft/softer handoff are weighted more than one not in handoff since an ATs in soft/softer handoff are at the cell edge and could potentially cause interference to neighboring sectors); and
      • e. the strength of the connection's signal(s) reported in the route update message (for example, the weight of a connection may be lessened if the connection reports a weak pilot signal strength for the sector in question, which indicates that the AT is only just able to observe the specific sector pilot).
  • In addition to variably weighting characteristics of connections in a sector, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm can be programmed to weight connections differently based on their transmit rate. Thus, for example, the soft/softer handoff factor of a connection transmitting at one rate can be weighted differently than the soft/softer handoff factor of another connection transmitting at a different rate.
  • After weighting the connections in a sector, the weighted connections in the sector are summed to obtain the effective number of connections in the sector. For example, in some implementations the generalized weight-rating algorithm is programmed according to Table I.
  • TABLE I
    Pilot
    Weights Strength
    Wi = sum[(⅙)(P1, . . . , P6)] Connection from
    1xEVDO such that Soft/Softer Effective Has Data Route
    RL Rate
    0 <= EPNO DRC Handoff RL Rate to send Update
    (Kbps) sum[(⅙)(P1, . . . , P6)] <= 1 (P1) (P2) Count (P3) (P4) (P5) (P6)
    153.6 W5 0 0 0 0 6 0
    76.8 W4 0 0 0 0 6 0
    38.4 W3 0 0 0 0 6 0
    19.2 W2 0 0 0 0 6 0
    9.6 W1 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • As shown, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm has been programmed only to consider whether a connection has data to send and ignores other characteristics of a connection. In addition, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm ignores connections that are transmitting at the lowest 1×EV-DO rate of 9.6 Kbps. Thus, if a sector has 10 connections and 4 of the 10 connections have data to send and of these 4 connections, one is transmitting at 9.6 Kbps, the generalized rate-weighting algorithm (as programmed according to Table I) will determine that there are 3 effective number of connections in the sector.
  • The RAN then sets a maximum rate limit for ATs in the sector based on the effective number of connections. If an AT has multiple connections for which an effective number of connections has been determined, the RAN may set the rate limit based on the largest effective number of connections of the sector with which the AT has a connection. In some implementations, the RAN uses the maximum rate limit table shown in Table II to set a maximum rate limit for the sector.
  • TABLE II
    Effective Number Maximum Rate Limit
    of Connections (C) (Kbps)
    1 <= C <= 7 153.6
    8 <= C <= 59 76.8
  • Thus, if the effective number of connections determined by the generalized rate-weighting algorithm is between 1 and 7, the RAN permits the ATs to transmit at the maximum 1×EV-DO rate of 153.6 Kbps. If the effective number of connections is between 8 and 59, the RAN limits the ATs in the sector to transmit at the second-highest 1×EV-DO rate of 76.8 Kbps. The current iteration of 1×EV-DO limits the number of connection in a sector to 59, which is why the table does not account for situations where the effective number of connections is over 59. However, future iterations of 1×EV-DO may increase the maximum number of connections in a sector, in which case, the rate limit table would be extended. Additionally, some implementations may use other rate limit tables to limit transmit rates of ATs based on characteristics of a sector (e.g., the hardware capabilities of a sector, the presence of objects like buildings that cause interference in a sector, etc.).
  • Some implementations may use any one or a combination of the connection characteristics described above to determine an effective number of connections. In addition, weighting of connection characteristics can vary depending on the transmit rate of the connection.
  • The RAN can be configured to transmit rate limit messages by way of unicast or broadcast messaging. For broadcast messaging, the RAN transmits a rate limit message to all ATs in a sector over the control channel on the forward link. For unicast messaging, the RAN transmits a rate limit message sent to individual ATs over the forward traffic channel on the forward link.
  • When an AT establishes a connection with a sector, it does so at the lowest rate, i.e., 9.6 Kbps, and will remain at this rate until it receives a rate limit message. Because it may take some time before the RAN transmits a rate limit message (e.g., a RAN may be configured to periodically broadcast rate limit messages in a sector), in some implementations the RAN is configured to send a rate limit message at the maximum rate of 153.6 Kbps immediately after a new connection is established to prevent an AT from needlessly remaining at a low transmit rate while waiting for a first rate limit message.
  • In some implementations determination of the effective number of connections and rate control is determined by the RNC. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, a RAN 50 includes an RNC 52 in communication with two RNs 54 a, 54 b over a backhaul network 56. For simplicity, it is assumed that each RN serves a single sector. Each RN includes an RA bit estimation algorithm 60 a, 60 b, which performs ROT measurements or, if not available, provides a post-AGC-ROT estimation, to set or clear the RA bit. As described in more detail above, the RNs transmit the RA bit 62 on the MAC channel to ATs 58 in the sector.
  • RNC 52 includes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm 63, which, as described above, uses the generalized rate-weighting algorithm to determine an effective number of connections for an AT over ALL sectors that the AT is in handoff with and then uses a rate limit table (e.g., Table II above) to set rate limits for the AT.
  • Rate limit messages 64 can be transmitted to ATs in the sector either via unicast or broadcast messaging. Unicast messages are reliable, but an individual message needs to be sent to each AT. This may increase the processing load on the RNC and signaling traffic between the RAN and the AT. If unicast messaging is used, the rate limit message can be transmitted either periodically or whenever there is a change in the rate limit.
  • Broadcast messages are best effort (and thus not as reliable as unicast messages). However, a broadcast rate limit message can be a single message per sector transmitted over the control channel of the sector. Thus, broadcasting conserves RNC processing resources and signaling bandwidth between AN and AT. As with unicast messaging, a broadcast rate limit message can be transmitted either periodically or whenever there is a change in the rate limit. It should be noted that broadcast rate limit messages normally needs to be transmitted to the AT through its serving sector, and there can be ambiguity in choosing the serving sector when the AT is switching sectors. However, periodic broadcasted rate limit messages tend to diminish this problem. Furthermore, due to the format of a broadcasted rate limit message, non-serving sectors sometimes have to transmit rate limit information for the AT, and, therefore, in some implementations, rate limit information for an AT is broadcasted from all sectors in handoff with an AT targeted for a rate limit.
  • In some implementations, a reverse rate and stability control algorithm is implemented at the radio node. For example, as shown in FIGS. 5A-5B, each radio node 54 a, 54 b executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm 63 a, 63 b in addition to the RA bit estimation algorithm 60 a, 60 b. In the implementation illustrated in FIG. 5A, if an AT is in soft handoff (and therefore has a connection with a sector outside RN 54 a), the effective number of connections for the sector(s) with which the AT has a connection but are outside the service area of RN 54 a are provided by the RNC that services the sector(s). In the implementation illustrated in FIG. 5B, the effective number of connections for sector(s) with which the AT has a connection but are outside the service area of the RN executing the reverse rate and stability control algorithm (e.g., RN 54 a) are provided directly by the appropriate RN via inter-RN messaging. As before, an RN can transmit rate limit messages to ATs via either broadcast or unicast messaging.
  • In the implementations illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5A-5B a reverse rate and stability control algorithm executed for a particular AT in all of the sectors in which the AT has a connection. This can be considered an optimal approach. In some implementations, however, determination of the effective number of connections is performed only on a subset of the sectors with which an AT has a connection. For example, an RN may determine an effective number of connections for the sectors with an AT has a connection AND are serviced by the RN. Thus, the RAN would not determine an effective number of connections for sectors in which the AT is in soft handoff. An approach that considers a subset of the sectors with which an AT has a connection can be considered a sub-optimal approach, but nonetheless can prevent sector overload without having to implement inter-RN messaging or additional RNC-RN messaging across the backhaul network. For example, as shown in FIG. 6, each RN 54 a, 54 b executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm without receiving information about a number of connections in other sectors that an AT, e.g., AT 58, may be in soft handoff with. As before, rate limit messages may be transmitted either via unicast or broadcast messaging.
  • In some implementations, a hybrid approach between the optimal and sub-optimal approaches is taken. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, each of the RNs 54 a, 54 b executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm over ALL sectors for connections that are not in soft handoff, i.e., only the sectors within the radio node (54 a or 54 b) are analyzed. In addition, the RNC 52 executes a reverse rate and stability control algorithm over ALL sectors for connections that are in soft handoff with all the sectors being analyzed. If the connection is not in handoff or in softer handoff, the unicast or broadcast rate limit messages are transmitted from the radio node (54 a or 54 b) itself. If the connection is in soft handoff, then the unicast or broadcast rate limit messages are transmitted from the RNC 52.
  • As described above, rate limit messages can be transmitted to affected ATs either view unicast or broadcast messaging. In some implementations, ATs that are not in soft or softer handoff receive rate limit messages via broadcast messaging from the radio node in which they have a connection, whereas ATs that are in soft or soft-softer handoff receive unicast or broadcast rate limit messages from the RNC. For ATs in soft handoff, the RN transmits a broadcast rate limit message corresponding to no handoff that will be overridden by the unicast message transmitted from the RNC. For connections in soft-softer handoff, the RN transmits a broadcast rate limit message corresponding to softer handoff that will be overridden by the unicast message transmitted from the RNC.
  • A simulation performed on an implementation using the sub-optimal approach with a reverse rate and stability control algorithm using a generalized rate-weighting algorithm programmed according to Table I above and a maximum rate limit table programmed according to Table II above. The simulation showed an improved reverse link sector throughput while still ensuring stability of the reverse link versus an implementation in which all ATs were limited to a transmit rate of 38.4 Kbps. Embodiments on existing systems select a conservative rate limit (such as 38.4 Kbps) to maintain reverse link stability. The simulations were based on the Strawman models provided the 3GPP2 standard bodies (3GPP2-1×EV-DO Evaluation Methodology (V1.3)) for wireless network simulation. Simulation results for a heavily loaded sector having 18 connections are shown in Table III.
  • TABLE III
    Implementation in
    which the reverse rate
    and stability control
    algorithm use GRW Implementation in
    algorithm shown which reverse
    in Table I and MRLT rate is limited to
    shown in Table II 38.4 Kbps for all ATs
    Activity Factor Average Average
    (fraction of Sector Average Sector Average
    connections with Throughput ROT Throughput ROT
    data to send) [kbps] [dB] [kbps] [dB]
    0.25 298.00 5.78 117.36 2.2
    0.5 290.05 5.70 116.04 2.2
    1.0 269.93 5.84 114.06 2.3
  • Note that the simulation of a RAN using a reverse rate and stability control algorithm achieved better sector throughput while operating at acceptable ROT than that of a RAN using which limited the transmit rate to 38.4 Kbps for all ATs in a sector.
  • In a system where more than one method for ROT measurement and/or post-AGC-ROT estimation is available, the system may use different rate weightings in the generalized rate-weighting algorithm may differ depending on the ROT/post-AGC-ROT estimation method used. Similarly, the system may use different rate limit tables (e.g., Table II above) depending on the ROT/post-AGC-ROT estimation method used. For example, if the system uses highly accurate RA bit estimation method (e.g., ROT measurement), the system may employ one weight limit table, whereas if the system uses a less accurate RA bit estimation method (e.g., a post-AGC-estimation ROT method), it may switch to a more conservative rate limit table.
  • A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and, accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (22)

1-35. (canceled)
36. A method for controlling a rate of transmission of an access terminal in a sector of a radio access network, the method comprising:
determining an effective number of connections for the sector, wherein the effective number of connections for the sector is less than a number of reverse link connections for the sector;
comparing the effective number of connections with one or more ranges of values; and
setting a rate limit for the access terminal based on the comparing.
37. The method of claim 36 wherein the sector comprises a first sector and the effective number of connections comprises a first effective number of connections, and wherein the method further comprises:
determining a second effective number of connections for a second sector of the radio access network serviced by a common radio node.
38. The method of claim 36 wherein setting the rate limit comprises:
accessing a maximum rate limit table; and
setting the rate limit based on the maximum rate limit table.
39. The method of claim 36 wherein the sector comprises a first sector and the effective number of connections comprises a first effective number of connections and wherein setting the rate limit comprises:
setting the rate limit for the access terminal based on a second effective number of connections for a second sector of the radio access network, wherein the second effective number of connections is equal to or greater than a third effective number of connections for a third sector of the radio access network.
40. The method of claim 36 further comprising:
performing a rise over thermal measurement for the sector; and
transmitting a signal to the access terminal indicating that the sector is becoming overloaded if the rise over thermal measurement (ROT) exceeds a predetermined amount.
41. The method of claim 40 further comprising:
performing a post automatic gain control ROT estimation for the sector; and
transmitting a signal to the access terminal indicating that the sector is becoming overloaded if the post automatic gain control ROT estimation exceeds a predetermined amount.
42. The method of claim 41 wherein setting the rate limit comprises:
using a first rate limit scheme when the ROT is performed for the sector; and
using a second rate limit scheme when the post automatic gain control ROT estimate is performed for the sector.
43. The method of claim 36 wherein the radio access network comprises a evolution data-only compliant network.
44. The method of claim 36 further comprising:
transmitting the rate limit to the access terminal.
45. The method of claim 44 wherein transmitting the rate limit comprises:
broadcasting a rate limit message to the access terminal in at least one sector in which the access terminal has the connection.
46. The method of claim 44 wherein the sector comprises a first sector and wherein transmitting the rate limit comprises:
unicasting a rate limit message to the access terminal in a second sector of the radio access network in which the access terminal has a traffic channel established.
47. The method of claim 36 wherein the sector comprises a first sector and the connection comprises a first connection, the method further comprising:
transmitting, to the access terminal, a rate limit message immediately upon the access terminal establishing a second connection in a second sector of the one or more sectors.
48. A radio node configured to transmit radio signals to, and to receive radio signals from, an access terminal in a sector of a radio access network, the radio node comprising:
one or more processing devices; and
memory for storing instructions that are executed by the one or more processing devices to:
determine an effective number of connections for the sector, wherein the effective number of connections for the sector is less than a number of reverse link connections for the sector;
compare the effective number of connections with one or more ranges of values; and
set a rate limit for the access terminal based on the compare.
49. The radio node of claim 48 wherein the sector comprises a first sector and the effective number of connections comprises a first effective number of connections and wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processing devices to:
set the rate limit for the access terminal based on a second effective number of connections for a second sector of the radio access network, wherein the second effective number of connections is equal to or greater than a third effective number of connections for a third sector of the one or more sectors.
50. The radio node of claim 48 wherein the sector comprises a first sector and the effective number of connections comprises a first effective number of connections and wherein the radio node is further configured to:
receive a second effective number of connections for a second sector of the radio access network.
51. The radio node of claim 50 wherein the radio node comprises a first radio node and wherein the second effective number of connections is received from a second radio node.
52. The radio node of claim 50 wherein the second effective number of connections for the second sector is received from a radio network controller.
53. The radio node of claim 48 wherein the instructions cause the one or more processing devices to set the rate limit by:
accessing a maximum rate limit table; and
setting the rate limit based on the maximum rate limit table.
54. The radio node of claim 48 wherein the memory also stores instructions that cause the one or more processing devices to:
transmit the rate limit to the access terminal.
55. The radio node of claim 54 wherein the instructions cause the one or more processing devices to transmit the rate limit to the access terminal via a unicast message.
56. The radio node of claim 54 wherein the instructions cause the one or more processing devices to transmit the rate limit to the access terminal via a broadcast message.
US12/731,841 2005-01-18 2010-03-25 Reverse link rate and stability control Abandoned US20100177731A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/731,841 US20100177731A1 (en) 2005-01-18 2010-03-25 Reverse link rate and stability control

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/037,515 US7729243B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2005-01-18 Reverse link rate and stability control
US12/731,841 US20100177731A1 (en) 2005-01-18 2010-03-25 Reverse link rate and stability control

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/037,515 Continuation US7729243B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2005-01-18 Reverse link rate and stability control

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100177731A1 true US20100177731A1 (en) 2010-07-15

Family

ID=36683773

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/037,515 Expired - Fee Related US7729243B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2005-01-18 Reverse link rate and stability control
US12/731,841 Abandoned US20100177731A1 (en) 2005-01-18 2010-03-25 Reverse link rate and stability control

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/037,515 Expired - Fee Related US7729243B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2005-01-18 Reverse link rate and stability control

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7729243B2 (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050243749A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Sepehr Mehrabanzad Reverse link power control
US20050245279A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Sepehr Mehrabanzad Reverse link power control
US20070026884A1 (en) * 2005-07-28 2007-02-01 Prashanth Rao Controlling usage capacity in a radio access network
US20070140168A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-06-21 Rajiv Laroia Methods and apparatus for determining, communicating and using information which can be used for interference control
US20090170547A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2009-07-02 Balaji Raghothaman Interference mitigation in wireless networks
US20110065464A1 (en) * 2001-10-12 2011-03-17 Sae-Young Chung Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station
US7926098B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2011-04-12 Airvana, Corp. Handoff of a secure connection among gateways
US8615238B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2013-12-24 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Radio network control
US9338767B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus of implementing and/or using a dedicated control channel
US9338795B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating transmission backlog information
US9451491B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-09-20 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus relating to generating and transmitting initial and additional control information report sets in a wireless system
US9462604B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-10-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus related to selecting a request group for a request report
US9473265B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-10-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating information utilizing a plurality of dictionaries
US9491051B2 (en) * 2014-05-29 2016-11-08 Cisco Technology, Inc. Centralized adjustment of data rates in mesh networks
US9544860B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2017-01-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Pilot signals for use in multi-sector cells
US9596322B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2017-03-14 Commscope Technologies Llc Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems
US9603102B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2017-03-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Method of transmitting pilot tones in a multi-sector cell, including null pilot tones, for generating channel quality indicators
US9661519B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2017-05-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient reporting of information in a wireless communication system
US9893917B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2018-02-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating control information
US10159006B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2018-12-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for reporting and/or using control information
US10244507B2 (en) 2013-09-24 2019-03-26 Andrew Wireless Systems Gmbh Distributed processing in a centralized radio access network
US10959120B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2021-03-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus related to selecting control channel reporting formats

Families Citing this family (100)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8160020B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2012-04-17 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Radio network control
EP1779543B1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2012-04-25 Andrew Richardson Signal transmission method from a local network node
WO2006010958A2 (en) 2004-07-30 2006-02-02 Andrew Richardson Power control in a local network node (lnn)
US9876670B2 (en) * 2004-07-30 2018-01-23 Commscope Technologies Llc Local network node
US7558356B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2009-07-07 Airvana, Inc. Providing global positioning system (GPS) timing signals to remote cellular base stations
US7515643B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2009-04-07 Airvana, Inc. Modulation for broadcasting from multiple transmitters
US7626926B2 (en) * 2004-12-09 2009-12-01 Airvana, Inc. Traffic management in a wireless data network
US7729243B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2010-06-01 Airvana, Inc. Reverse link rate and stability control
US7831257B2 (en) * 2005-04-26 2010-11-09 Airvana, Inc. Measuring interference in radio networks
US8099504B2 (en) 2005-06-24 2012-01-17 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Preserving sessions in a wireless network
US8295818B2 (en) 2005-09-15 2012-10-23 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Broadcasting in wireless systems
US7751835B2 (en) * 2005-10-04 2010-07-06 Airvana, Inc. Non-circular paging areas
US7558588B2 (en) * 2005-11-18 2009-07-07 Airvana, Inc. Resource allocation in a radio access network
US8145221B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2012-03-27 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Radio network communication
US8619702B2 (en) 2005-12-16 2013-12-31 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Radio network control
US8094630B2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2012-01-10 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Radio frequency dragging prevention
US20070140218A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Nair Girish R Managing backhaul connections in radio access networks
US7801487B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2010-09-21 Airvana, Inc. Detection of radio frequency interference in wireless communication systems
US11477617B2 (en) * 2006-03-20 2022-10-18 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Unicasting and multicasting multimedia services
US7672682B2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2010-03-02 Airvana, Inc. Managing page cycle periods of access terminals
US8346220B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2013-01-01 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Signaling for push-to-talk
US7953040B2 (en) * 2006-04-19 2011-05-31 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Channel assignment in wireless communication
US8737361B2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2014-05-27 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for transmitting signal in communication system
US8085696B2 (en) 2006-07-14 2011-12-27 Airvana Networks Solutions, Inc. Dynamic modification of route update protocols
US8160629B2 (en) * 2006-09-07 2012-04-17 Airvana, Corp. Controlling reverse link interference in private access points for wireless networking
US8688809B2 (en) * 2006-09-07 2014-04-01 Airvana Lp Provisioning private access points for wireless networking
US8078165B2 (en) * 2006-09-07 2011-12-13 Airvana, Corp. Configuring preferred user zone lists for private access points for wireless networking
US8130686B2 (en) * 2006-11-20 2012-03-06 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Multicasting push-to-media content
US8023439B2 (en) * 2006-11-20 2011-09-20 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Multicast flow distribution
US7730189B2 (en) * 2006-11-22 2010-06-01 Airvana, Inc. Network-initiated session recovery
US8639247B2 (en) * 2006-12-12 2014-01-28 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Access terminal session authentication
US8532658B2 (en) * 2006-12-19 2013-09-10 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Neighbor list provision in a communication network
US8457084B2 (en) * 2006-12-20 2013-06-04 Airvana Llc Communication group configuration in a network
US8176327B2 (en) 2006-12-27 2012-05-08 Airvana, Corp. Authentication protocol
US8229498B2 (en) 2006-12-28 2012-07-24 Airvana, Corp. Assigning code space to portable base stations
US8781483B2 (en) * 2007-04-13 2014-07-15 Airvana Lp Controlling access to private access points for wireless networking
US8400989B2 (en) * 2007-04-13 2013-03-19 Airvana Llc Activating private access points for wireless networking
US20090005102A1 (en) * 2007-06-30 2009-01-01 Suman Das Method and Apparatus for Dynamically Adjusting Base Station Transmit Power
US8543139B2 (en) * 2007-08-03 2013-09-24 Airvana Llc Distributed network
US8594663B2 (en) * 2007-09-24 2013-11-26 Airvana Llc Selecting embedded cells in wireless networks
US7933619B2 (en) * 2007-10-02 2011-04-26 Airvana, Corp. Wireless control of access points
US8358623B2 (en) * 2007-11-06 2013-01-22 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Active handoffs in a network
US8843638B2 (en) 2007-12-13 2014-09-23 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Handing off active connections
US8520659B2 (en) * 2007-12-18 2013-08-27 Airvana Llc Absolute time recovery
US8379625B2 (en) 2007-12-18 2013-02-19 Airvana Llc Obtaining time information in a cellular network
US8259671B2 (en) 2007-12-18 2012-09-04 Airvana, Corp. Attracting access terminals
US8355727B2 (en) * 2007-12-19 2013-01-15 Airvana, Corp. Proximity detection in a network
US7983672B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2011-07-19 Airvana, Corp. Managing communications with private access points in wireless networks
US8452299B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-05-28 Airvana Llc Allocating code space to base stations
US8909278B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2014-12-09 Airvana Lp Adjusting wireless signal transmission power
US8615593B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-12-24 Airvana Llc Providing zone indications for wireless networking
US8402143B2 (en) * 2007-12-28 2013-03-19 Airvana Llc Secure proxies for flat networks
US20090168766A1 (en) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-02 Vedat Eyuboglu Inter-Technology Bridging Over Access Points
US8060058B2 (en) * 2007-12-28 2011-11-15 Airvana, Corp. Secure mobile base station connections
US8554231B2 (en) * 2007-12-31 2013-10-08 Airvana Llc Adaptation of portable base stations into cellular networks
US7835698B2 (en) * 2007-12-31 2010-11-16 Airvana, Corp. Interference mitigation in wireless networks
US8107438B1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-01-31 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Method for initiating handoff of a wireless access terminal based on the reverse activity bit
US8295256B2 (en) * 2008-08-29 2012-10-23 Airvana, Corp. Private access point beacon signals in wireless networks
US8229397B2 (en) 2008-09-23 2012-07-24 Airvana, Corp. Access terminal authorization at private access points in wireless networks
US8942136B2 (en) * 2008-10-07 2015-01-27 Airvana Lp Allocating communication frequencies to clusters of access points
US7995493B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2011-08-09 Airvana, Corp. Estimating bandwidth in communication networks
US8774134B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2014-07-08 Airvana Lp Access terminal hand-off methods in wireless networks
US8953566B2 (en) * 2008-12-29 2015-02-10 Airvana Lp Providing a cellular network with connectivity to a different network
US20100167777A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Airvana, Inc. Power control for reverse link
US8160631B2 (en) * 2008-12-30 2012-04-17 Airvana, Corp. Power control for reverse link
US8170598B2 (en) * 2008-12-30 2012-05-01 Airvana, Corp. Information sharing in a private access point network
US9210569B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2015-12-08 Commscope Technologies Llc Femto personal proxy application client
US9078284B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2015-07-07 Airvana Lp Personal access point media server
US8693987B2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2014-04-08 Airvana Lp Femto personal policy server
US8280376B2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2012-10-02 Airvana, Corp. Geography aware peer-to-peer overlay creation
US8040803B1 (en) 2009-01-08 2011-10-18 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Using packet-transport metrics for call-admission control
US8254930B1 (en) 2009-02-18 2012-08-28 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Method and system for changing a media session codec before handoff in a wireless network
US9374306B1 (en) 2009-03-04 2016-06-21 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Using packet-transport metrics for setting DRCLocks
US8805371B2 (en) * 2009-03-17 2014-08-12 Airvana Lp Identifying hand-over targets in lightly coordinated networks
US9467938B1 (en) 2009-04-29 2016-10-11 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Using DRCLocks for conducting call admission control
US8428601B2 (en) * 2009-05-07 2013-04-23 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Wireless network inter-technology handoffs
US8542707B2 (en) * 2009-05-18 2013-09-24 Airvana Llc Multi-carrier system selection
US8310929B1 (en) 2009-06-04 2012-11-13 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Method and system for controlling data rates based on backhaul capacity
US7907571B2 (en) * 2009-06-30 2011-03-15 Airvana, Corp. Mobile aware beacon
US8245088B1 (en) 2009-06-30 2012-08-14 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Implementing quality of service (QoS) by using hybrid ARQ (HARQ) response for triggering the EV-DO reverse activity bit (RAB)
US8204000B1 (en) 2009-07-23 2012-06-19 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Achieving quality of service (QoS) by using the reverse activity bit (RAB) in creation of neighbor lists for selected access terminals
US8718697B2 (en) * 2009-10-07 2014-05-06 Airvana Lp Mitigating interference using cooperative scheduling
US8340636B2 (en) * 2009-11-30 2012-12-25 Airvana Llc Determining if an access terminal is authorized to use an access point
US8462651B1 (en) 2009-12-28 2013-06-11 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Methods and devices for using silence intervals to enhance wireless communications
US8363564B1 (en) 2010-03-25 2013-01-29 Sprint Spectrum L.P. EVDO coverage modification based on backhaul capacity
US8515434B1 (en) 2010-04-08 2013-08-20 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Methods and devices for limiting access to femtocell radio access networks
JP6112487B2 (en) * 2011-08-31 2017-04-12 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Mobile terminal and rate change control method
US9237492B2 (en) 2012-05-31 2016-01-12 Commscope Technologies Llc Providing circuit switched service
US9026128B1 (en) * 2012-08-24 2015-05-05 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Systems and methods for managing signaling traffic in a wireless coverage area in response to varying congestion
US9936470B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2018-04-03 Commscope Technologies Llc Radio access networks
US9414399B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2016-08-09 Commscope Technologies Llc Radio access networks
US9380466B2 (en) 2013-02-07 2016-06-28 Commscope Technologies Llc Radio access networks
WO2015050482A1 (en) * 2013-10-01 2015-04-09 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Adjusting ran capability based on data transport characteristics of a backhaul network in a telecommunication network.
US10057916B2 (en) 2014-06-09 2018-08-21 Commscope Technologies Llc Radio access networks in which mobile devices in the same communication cell can be scheduled to use the same airlink resource
US10785791B1 (en) 2015-12-07 2020-09-22 Commscope Technologies Llc Controlling data transmission in radio access networks
CN116318589A (en) 2017-10-03 2023-06-23 康普技术有限责任公司 Dynamic downlink reuse in C-RAN
WO2019222415A1 (en) 2018-05-16 2019-11-21 Commscope Technologies Llc Dynamic uplink reuse in a c-ran
CN112005598B (en) 2018-05-16 2023-06-09 康普技术有限责任公司 Downlink multicast for efficient forward in C-RAN
US10798667B2 (en) 2018-06-08 2020-10-06 Commscope Technologies Llc Automatic transmit power control for radio points of a centralized radio access network that primarily provide wireless service to users located in an event area of a venue
EP3847788A4 (en) 2018-09-04 2022-05-11 CommScope Technologies LLC Front-haul rate reduction for use in a centralized radio access network

Citations (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4031469A (en) * 1975-09-10 1977-06-21 The Singer Company Receiver gain calibration
US4072900A (en) * 1977-05-23 1978-02-07 Ray Carl L CB Radio accessory unit
US5631604A (en) * 1994-01-11 1997-05-20 Ericsson Inc. Waste energy control and management in power amplifiers
US5857147A (en) * 1993-09-08 1999-01-05 Qualcom Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining the transmission data rate in a multi-user communication system
US5873028A (en) * 1994-10-24 1999-02-16 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Transmission power control apparatus and method in a mobile communication system
US5878350A (en) * 1996-05-22 1999-03-02 Ntt Mobile Communication Network Inc. Scheme for controlling transmission powers during soft handover in a CDMA mobile communication system
US5884187A (en) * 1996-03-13 1999-03-16 Ziv; Noam A. Method and apparatus for providing centralized power control administration for a set of base stations
US5923650A (en) * 1997-04-08 1999-07-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for reverse link rate scheduling
US6085108A (en) * 1997-12-15 2000-07-04 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Modified downlink power control during macrodiversity
US6226525B1 (en) * 1998-09-16 2001-05-01 Alcatel Networks Corporation Power control of LMDS/LMCS base station to provide rain fade compensation
US6259927B1 (en) * 1997-06-06 2001-07-10 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Transmit power control in a radio communication system
US20020021687A1 (en) * 2000-06-14 2002-02-21 Kazuya Toki Time-division multiplexing radio system
US20020072385A1 (en) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-13 Alexandro Salvarani Power control method for CDMA wireless communication networks
US6507744B1 (en) * 1998-12-29 2003-01-14 Lg Information & Communications, Ltd. Outer loop power control method during a soft handoff operation
US20030072294A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-04-17 Yongbin Wei Method and apparatus for managing imbalance in a communication system
US20030083092A1 (en) * 2001-10-29 2003-05-01 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for controlling power of a forward common power control channel in a mobile communication system
US20030092463A1 (en) * 2001-11-12 2003-05-15 Charriere Patrick Georges Venceslas Control of the transmission power of a CDMA based system
US6567420B1 (en) * 1999-04-15 2003-05-20 Qualcomm, Incorporated Method and apparatus for high rate channel access control
US20030100311A1 (en) * 2001-10-12 2003-05-29 Sae-Young Chung Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station
US6584087B1 (en) * 1999-06-09 2003-06-24 Infineon Technologies North America Corp. Power control during inter-generation soft handoffs
US6697378B1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2004-02-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for class based transmission control of data connections based on real-time external feedback estimates obtained using messaging from a wireless network
US20040038697A1 (en) * 2002-08-23 2004-02-26 Attar Rashid Ahmed Method and system for a data transmission in a communication system
US20040047305A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-03-11 Fatih Ulupinar Distributed reverse channel outer loop power control for a wireless communications system
US6711144B1 (en) * 2000-09-15 2004-03-23 Airvana, Inc. Multi-user communication of voice and data
US6731618B1 (en) * 2000-10-20 2004-05-04 Airvana, Inc. Coding for multi-user communication
US6741862B2 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-05-25 Airvana, Inc. Enhanced reverse-link rate control in wireless communication
US20040109424A1 (en) * 2002-12-04 2004-06-10 Ashvin Chheda Mobile assisted fast scheduling for the reverse link
US20050047375A1 (en) * 2003-09-02 2005-03-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for providing state information of a mobile station in a mobile communication system
US20050047365A1 (en) * 2003-08-30 2005-03-03 Ki-Seob Hong Method for controlling a data transfer rate in a reverse link of a mobile communication system
US20050107090A1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2005-05-19 Hosein Patrick A. Reverse link scheduler for CDMA networks
US20050107091A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-05-19 Rath Vannithamby Dynamic voice over data prioritization for wireless communication networks
US6904286B1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2005-06-07 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system of integrated rate control for a traffic flow across wireline and wireless networks
US20050124369A1 (en) * 2003-12-03 2005-06-09 Attar Rashid A. Overload detection in a wireless communication system
US20050141454A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2005-06-30 Avinash Jain Data rate control in soft handoff and during cell-switching
US6983333B2 (en) * 2000-10-25 2006-01-03 Alcatel Method and device for controlling radio cell cluster using protocol stacks allocated to different multiprocessor modules
US6983153B2 (en) * 2001-06-07 2006-01-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for congestion control in a wireless communication system
US6999425B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2006-02-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Dynamic reverse link rate limit algorithm for high data rate system
US7016686B2 (en) * 2000-12-15 2006-03-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Congestion control in a CDMA-based mobile radio communications system
US20060067451A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Pollman Michael D Providing global positioning system timing signals to remote cellular base stations
US20060067422A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Sae-Young Chung Modulation for broadcasting from multiple transmitters
US7031141B2 (en) * 2003-12-26 2006-04-18 Rohm Co., Ltd. Solid electrolytic capacitor and electric circuit
US20060126509A1 (en) * 2004-12-09 2006-06-15 Firas Abi-Nassif Traffic management in a wireless data network
US20060135173A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Method and apparatus for mobile station-assisted load balancing in wireless packet data networks
US20060135189A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Shirish Nagaraj Method of controlling a received signal strength target in a wireless communication system
US20060159045A1 (en) * 2005-01-18 2006-07-20 Satish Ananthaiyer Reverse link rate and stability control
US7082317B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2006-07-25 Fujitsu Limited Communication apparatus and outer-loop power control method
US7170871B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2007-01-30 Airvana, Inc. Radio network control
US20070026884A1 (en) * 2005-07-28 2007-02-01 Prashanth Rao Controlling usage capacity in a radio access network
US20070058628A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-15 Palnati Prasasth R Broadcasting in wireless systems
US7200391B2 (en) * 2002-12-06 2007-04-03 Airvana, Inc. Capacity enhancement schemes for forward and reverse links of distributed cellular base stations
US20070077948A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-04-05 Vivek Sharma Non-circular paging areas
US20070081509A1 (en) * 2003-07-31 2007-04-12 Sk Telecom Co., Ltd. Method and system for controlling reverse link rate in cdma 1xev-do mobile communication system
US7206291B2 (en) * 2001-09-04 2007-04-17 Nokia Corporation Determination of parameter values of an uplink transport channel
US20070101015A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2007-05-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Fast opportunistic distributed resource reallocation for established connections in a multihop network
US20070110534A1 (en) * 2005-11-15 2007-05-17 Erickson Robert A Rotary tapered tool holder
US20070115896A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Philip To Resource allocation in a radio access network
US20070140172A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Deepak Garg Radio network control
US20070140218A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Nair Girish R Managing backhaul connections in radio access networks
US20070140184A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Deepak Garg Radio frequency dragging prevention
US20070140185A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Deepak Garg Radio network communication
US20070155329A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Sepehr Mehrabanzad Detection of radio frequency interference in wireless communication systems
US7248875B2 (en) * 2002-06-25 2007-07-24 Nokia Corporation Method and system to optimise soft handover gain in networks
US7248889B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2007-07-24 Nokia Corporation Method and device for controlling the power in an asymmetric soft handover condition
US20080003988A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-01-03 Andrew Richardson Local Network Node
US20080013488A1 (en) * 2006-07-14 2008-01-17 Deepak Garg Dynamic modification of route update protocols
US20080062925A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Amit Mate Controlling reverse link interference in private access points for wireless networking
US20080065752A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Ch Ng Shi Baw Provisioning private access points for wireless networking
US20080069020A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-03-20 Andrew Richardson Signal Transmission Method from a Local Network Node
US20080069028A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-03-20 Andrew Richardson Power Control in a Local Network Node (Lln)
US20080076398A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-27 Amit Mate Configuring preferred user zone lists for private access points for wireless networking
US7366230B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2008-04-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Power control in mobile radio communications systems
US20080120417A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 Gopal Harikumar Network-Initiated Session Recovery
US20080117842A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Rao Roshan M Multicast Flow Distribution
US20080119172A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Rao Roshan M Multicasting Push-To-Media Content
US20080139203A1 (en) * 2006-12-12 2008-06-12 Dennis Ng Access Terminal Session Authentication
US20080146232A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Douglas Norman Knisely Neighbor list provision in a communication network
US20080151843A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Ravi Valmikam Communication group configuration in a network
US20080159236A1 (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-03 Airvana, Inc. Assigning code space to portable base stations
US20080162924A1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 Airvana, Inc. Handoff of a secure connection among gateways
US20080162926A1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2008-07-03 Jay Xiong Authentication protocol
US20090034440A1 (en) * 2007-08-03 2009-02-05 Airvana, Inc. Distributed network
US20090082020A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Ch Ng Shi Baw Selecting embedded cells in wireless networks
US20090088155A1 (en) * 2007-10-02 2009-04-02 Woojune Kim Wireless control of access points
US20090088146A1 (en) * 2005-01-21 2009-04-02 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods And Devices For Uplink Load Estimation
US20090116445A1 (en) * 2007-11-06 2009-05-07 Airvana, Inc. Active handoffs in a network
US20090154447A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2009-06-18 Humblet Pierre A Absolute time recovery
US20090156195A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2009-06-18 Humblet Pierre A Obtaining time information in a cellular network
US20090156165A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2009-06-18 Balaji Raghothaman Attracting Access Terminals
US20090156218A1 (en) * 2007-12-13 2009-06-18 Airvana, Inc. Handing off active connections
US20090163216A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Minh Hoang Proximity detection in a network
US20090164547A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Ch Ng Shi Baw Providing zone indications for wireless networking
US20090163202A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Humblet Pierre A Managing communications with private access points in wireless networks
US20090163238A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Prashanth Rao Adjusting Wireless Signal Transmission Power
US20090168788A1 (en) * 2007-12-31 2009-07-02 Minsh Den Network address translation for tunnel mobility
US20090168766A1 (en) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-02 Vedat Eyuboglu Inter-Technology Bridging Over Access Points

Family Cites Families (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5828677A (en) 1996-03-20 1998-10-27 Lucent Technologies Inc. Adaptive hybrid ARQ coding schemes for slow fading channels in mobile radio systems
US5982760A (en) 1997-06-20 1999-11-09 Qualcomm Inc. Method and apparatus for power adaptation control in closed-loop communications
FR2787604B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2001-08-31 Canon Kk METHOD FOR INSERTING A SECRET MARK AND AUTHENTICATING A DIGITAL SIGNAL
US6633552B1 (en) 1999-08-06 2003-10-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining the closed loop power control set point in a wireless packet data communication system
US7277446B1 (en) 2000-11-02 2007-10-02 Airvana, Inc. Communication of digital data over a wireless transmission medium
US8605686B2 (en) 2001-02-12 2013-12-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for power control in a wireless communication system
US7120134B2 (en) 2001-02-15 2006-10-10 Qualcomm, Incorporated Reverse link channel architecture for a wireless communication system
AU2002316128A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2002-12-03 Bytemobile, Inc. Quality of service management for multiple connections within a network communication system
US8195187B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2012-06-05 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Radio network control
US6781999B2 (en) 2001-07-23 2004-08-24 Airvana, Inc. Broadcasting and multicasting in wireless communication
US7299278B2 (en) 2002-01-16 2007-11-20 Airvana, Inc. Managing network faults
US8504054B2 (en) 2002-09-10 2013-08-06 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for multilevel scheduling
US7630321B2 (en) 2002-09-10 2009-12-08 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for rate assignment
WO2004028181A1 (en) 2002-09-18 2004-04-01 Nokia Corporation Method for managing radio resources and radio system
US7411974B2 (en) 2002-11-14 2008-08-12 Qualcomm Incorporated Wireless communication rate shaping
US7085570B2 (en) 2002-12-23 2006-08-01 Nokia Corporation Handover method, system and radio network controller
US20040213182A1 (en) 2003-01-10 2004-10-28 Hoon Huh Apparatus and method for controlling a reverse rate in a mobile communication system supporting packet data service
US7406077B2 (en) 2003-01-10 2008-07-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Generalized rate control for a wireless communications network
US6965564B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2005-11-15 America Online, Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
US7120447B1 (en) 2003-02-24 2006-10-10 Nortel Networks Limited Selectable mode vocoder management algorithm for CDMA based networks
US7142548B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2006-11-28 Nortel Networks Limited Communicating in a reverse wireless link information relating to buffer status and data rate of a mobile station
US7551588B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2009-06-23 Nortel Networks Limited Autonomous mode transmission from a mobile station
US7746816B2 (en) 2003-03-13 2010-06-29 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and system for a power control in a communication system
US7983708B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2011-07-19 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Reverse link power control
US7843892B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2010-11-30 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Reverse link power control
US20050250511A1 (en) 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Weimin Xiao Method for rate control signaling to facilitate UE uplink data transfer
US7268674B2 (en) 2005-01-26 2007-09-11 Gelcore Llc Remote dummy load
US7486954B2 (en) 2005-03-25 2009-02-03 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method of controlling load sharing between in-cell and soft handoff users
KR20060105304A (en) 2005-04-04 2006-10-11 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for reporming scheduling efficiently in mobile telecommunication system
US7831257B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2010-11-09 Airvana, Inc. Measuring interference in radio networks
US9277455B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2016-03-01 Alcatel Lucent Flow-based call admission control for wireless communication systems
US8099504B2 (en) 2005-06-24 2012-01-17 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Preserving sessions in a wireless network
US20060291420A1 (en) 2005-06-27 2006-12-28 Dennis Ng Network-initiated dormant handoffs
US7865159B2 (en) 2006-01-27 2011-01-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Repeater rise-over-thermal (RoT) value calibration
US11477617B2 (en) 2006-03-20 2022-10-18 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Unicasting and multicasting multimedia services
US7672682B2 (en) 2006-03-28 2010-03-02 Airvana, Inc. Managing page cycle periods of access terminals
US20070230419A1 (en) 2006-03-31 2007-10-04 Sundar Raman QoS signaling to support fairness
US8346220B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2013-01-01 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Signaling for push-to-talk
US7839830B2 (en) 2006-04-11 2010-11-23 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Uplink scheduler for cellular packet access
US20070242648A1 (en) 2006-04-12 2007-10-18 Deepak Garg Managing dormant handoffs in radio access networks
US7953040B2 (en) 2006-04-19 2011-05-31 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Channel assignment in wireless communication
US8400989B2 (en) 2007-04-13 2013-03-19 Airvana Llc Activating private access points for wireless networking
US8781483B2 (en) 2007-04-13 2014-07-15 Airvana Lp Controlling access to private access points for wireless networking
US8165528B2 (en) 2007-12-27 2012-04-24 Airvana, Corp. Interference mitigation in wireless networks

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4031469A (en) * 1975-09-10 1977-06-21 The Singer Company Receiver gain calibration
US4072900A (en) * 1977-05-23 1978-02-07 Ray Carl L CB Radio accessory unit
US5857147A (en) * 1993-09-08 1999-01-05 Qualcom Incorporated Method and apparatus for determining the transmission data rate in a multi-user communication system
US5631604A (en) * 1994-01-11 1997-05-20 Ericsson Inc. Waste energy control and management in power amplifiers
US5873028A (en) * 1994-10-24 1999-02-16 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Transmission power control apparatus and method in a mobile communication system
US5884187A (en) * 1996-03-13 1999-03-16 Ziv; Noam A. Method and apparatus for providing centralized power control administration for a set of base stations
US5878350A (en) * 1996-05-22 1999-03-02 Ntt Mobile Communication Network Inc. Scheme for controlling transmission powers during soft handover in a CDMA mobile communication system
US5923650A (en) * 1997-04-08 1999-07-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for reverse link rate scheduling
US6259927B1 (en) * 1997-06-06 2001-07-10 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Transmit power control in a radio communication system
US6085108A (en) * 1997-12-15 2000-07-04 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Modified downlink power control during macrodiversity
US6226525B1 (en) * 1998-09-16 2001-05-01 Alcatel Networks Corporation Power control of LMDS/LMCS base station to provide rain fade compensation
US6697378B1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2004-02-24 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for class based transmission control of data connections based on real-time external feedback estimates obtained using messaging from a wireless network
US6507744B1 (en) * 1998-12-29 2003-01-14 Lg Information & Communications, Ltd. Outer loop power control method during a soft handoff operation
US6567420B1 (en) * 1999-04-15 2003-05-20 Qualcomm, Incorporated Method and apparatus for high rate channel access control
US6584087B1 (en) * 1999-06-09 2003-06-24 Infineon Technologies North America Corp. Power control during inter-generation soft handoffs
US20020021687A1 (en) * 2000-06-14 2002-02-21 Kazuya Toki Time-division multiplexing radio system
US6711144B1 (en) * 2000-09-15 2004-03-23 Airvana, Inc. Multi-user communication of voice and data
US6731618B1 (en) * 2000-10-20 2004-05-04 Airvana, Inc. Coding for multi-user communication
US6983333B2 (en) * 2000-10-25 2006-01-03 Alcatel Method and device for controlling radio cell cluster using protocol stacks allocated to different multiprocessor modules
US6999425B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2006-02-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Dynamic reverse link rate limit algorithm for high data rate system
US20020072385A1 (en) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-13 Alexandro Salvarani Power control method for CDMA wireless communication networks
US7016686B2 (en) * 2000-12-15 2006-03-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Congestion control in a CDMA-based mobile radio communications system
US6741862B2 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-05-25 Airvana, Inc. Enhanced reverse-link rate control in wireless communication
US6983153B2 (en) * 2001-06-07 2006-01-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for congestion control in a wireless communication system
US7170871B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2007-01-30 Airvana, Inc. Radio network control
US20070097916A1 (en) * 2001-06-25 2007-05-03 Airvana, Inc., A Massachusetts Corporation Radio network control
US6904286B1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2005-06-07 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system of integrated rate control for a traffic flow across wireline and wireless networks
US7206291B2 (en) * 2001-09-04 2007-04-17 Nokia Corporation Determination of parameter values of an uplink transport channel
US7242958B2 (en) * 2001-10-12 2007-07-10 Airvana, Inc. Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station
US20030100311A1 (en) * 2001-10-12 2003-05-29 Sae-Young Chung Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station
US20030072294A1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2003-04-17 Yongbin Wei Method and apparatus for managing imbalance in a communication system
US20030083092A1 (en) * 2001-10-29 2003-05-01 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for controlling power of a forward common power control channel in a mobile communication system
US20030092463A1 (en) * 2001-11-12 2003-05-15 Charriere Patrick Georges Venceslas Control of the transmission power of a CDMA based system
US7366230B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2008-04-29 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Power control in mobile radio communications systems
US7248889B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2007-07-24 Nokia Corporation Method and device for controlling the power in an asymmetric soft handover condition
US7082317B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2006-07-25 Fujitsu Limited Communication apparatus and outer-loop power control method
US7248875B2 (en) * 2002-06-25 2007-07-24 Nokia Corporation Method and system to optimise soft handover gain in networks
US20040038697A1 (en) * 2002-08-23 2004-02-26 Attar Rashid Ahmed Method and system for a data transmission in a communication system
US20040047305A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-03-11 Fatih Ulupinar Distributed reverse channel outer loop power control for a wireless communications system
US20040109424A1 (en) * 2002-12-04 2004-06-10 Ashvin Chheda Mobile assisted fast scheduling for the reverse link
US7200391B2 (en) * 2002-12-06 2007-04-03 Airvana, Inc. Capacity enhancement schemes for forward and reverse links of distributed cellular base stations
US20070081509A1 (en) * 2003-07-31 2007-04-12 Sk Telecom Co., Ltd. Method and system for controlling reverse link rate in cdma 1xev-do mobile communication system
US7689173B2 (en) * 2003-07-31 2010-03-30 Sk Telecom Co., Ltd. Method and system for controlling reverse link rate in CDMA 1xEV-DO mobile communication system
US20050047365A1 (en) * 2003-08-30 2005-03-03 Ki-Seob Hong Method for controlling a data transfer rate in a reverse link of a mobile communication system
US20050047375A1 (en) * 2003-09-02 2005-03-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method for providing state information of a mobile station in a mobile communication system
US20050141454A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2005-06-30 Avinash Jain Data rate control in soft handoff and during cell-switching
US20050107090A1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2005-05-19 Hosein Patrick A. Reverse link scheduler for CDMA networks
US20050107091A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-05-19 Rath Vannithamby Dynamic voice over data prioritization for wireless communication networks
US20050124369A1 (en) * 2003-12-03 2005-06-09 Attar Rashid A. Overload detection in a wireless communication system
US20070101015A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2007-05-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Fast opportunistic distributed resource reallocation for established connections in a multihop network
US7031141B2 (en) * 2003-12-26 2006-04-18 Rohm Co., Ltd. Solid electrolytic capacitor and electric circuit
US20080069028A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-03-20 Andrew Richardson Power Control in a Local Network Node (Lln)
US20080003988A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-01-03 Andrew Richardson Local Network Node
US20080069020A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-03-20 Andrew Richardson Signal Transmission Method from a Local Network Node
US20060067422A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Sae-Young Chung Modulation for broadcasting from multiple transmitters
US20060067451A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Pollman Michael D Providing global positioning system timing signals to remote cellular base stations
US20060126509A1 (en) * 2004-12-09 2006-06-15 Firas Abi-Nassif Traffic management in a wireless data network
US20060135173A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-06-22 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Method and apparatus for mobile station-assisted load balancing in wireless packet data networks
US20060135189A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Shirish Nagaraj Method of controlling a received signal strength target in a wireless communication system
US7729243B2 (en) * 2005-01-18 2010-06-01 Airvana, Inc. Reverse link rate and stability control
US20060159045A1 (en) * 2005-01-18 2006-07-20 Satish Ananthaiyer Reverse link rate and stability control
US20090088146A1 (en) * 2005-01-21 2009-04-02 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Methods And Devices For Uplink Load Estimation
US20070026884A1 (en) * 2005-07-28 2007-02-01 Prashanth Rao Controlling usage capacity in a radio access network
US20070058628A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-15 Palnati Prasasth R Broadcasting in wireless systems
US20070077948A1 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-04-05 Vivek Sharma Non-circular paging areas
US20070110534A1 (en) * 2005-11-15 2007-05-17 Erickson Robert A Rotary tapered tool holder
US20070115896A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Philip To Resource allocation in a radio access network
US20070140185A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Deepak Garg Radio network communication
US20070140184A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Deepak Garg Radio frequency dragging prevention
US20070140218A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Nair Girish R Managing backhaul connections in radio access networks
US20070140172A1 (en) * 2005-12-16 2007-06-21 Deepak Garg Radio network control
US20070155329A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Sepehr Mehrabanzad Detection of radio frequency interference in wireless communication systems
US20080013488A1 (en) * 2006-07-14 2008-01-17 Deepak Garg Dynamic modification of route update protocols
US20080076398A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-27 Amit Mate Configuring preferred user zone lists for private access points for wireless networking
US20080065752A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Ch Ng Shi Baw Provisioning private access points for wireless networking
US20080062925A1 (en) * 2006-09-07 2008-03-13 Amit Mate Controlling reverse link interference in private access points for wireless networking
US20080117842A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Rao Roshan M Multicast Flow Distribution
US20080119172A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Rao Roshan M Multicasting Push-To-Media Content
US20080120417A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 Gopal Harikumar Network-Initiated Session Recovery
US20080139203A1 (en) * 2006-12-12 2008-06-12 Dennis Ng Access Terminal Session Authentication
US20080146232A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Douglas Norman Knisely Neighbor list provision in a communication network
US20080151843A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Ravi Valmikam Communication group configuration in a network
US20080162926A1 (en) * 2006-12-27 2008-07-03 Jay Xiong Authentication protocol
US20080159236A1 (en) * 2006-12-28 2008-07-03 Airvana, Inc. Assigning code space to portable base stations
US20080162924A1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2008-07-03 Airvana, Inc. Handoff of a secure connection among gateways
US20090034440A1 (en) * 2007-08-03 2009-02-05 Airvana, Inc. Distributed network
US20090082020A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Ch Ng Shi Baw Selecting embedded cells in wireless networks
US20090088155A1 (en) * 2007-10-02 2009-04-02 Woojune Kim Wireless control of access points
US20090116445A1 (en) * 2007-11-06 2009-05-07 Airvana, Inc. Active handoffs in a network
US20090156218A1 (en) * 2007-12-13 2009-06-18 Airvana, Inc. Handing off active connections
US20090154447A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2009-06-18 Humblet Pierre A Absolute time recovery
US20090156195A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2009-06-18 Humblet Pierre A Obtaining time information in a cellular network
US20090156165A1 (en) * 2007-12-18 2009-06-18 Balaji Raghothaman Attracting Access Terminals
US20090163216A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Minh Hoang Proximity detection in a network
US20090163202A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Humblet Pierre A Managing communications with private access points in wireless networks
US20090163238A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Prashanth Rao Adjusting Wireless Signal Transmission Power
US20090164547A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Ch Ng Shi Baw Providing zone indications for wireless networking
US20090168766A1 (en) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-02 Vedat Eyuboglu Inter-Technology Bridging Over Access Points
US20090168788A1 (en) * 2007-12-31 2009-07-02 Minsh Den Network address translation for tunnel mobility

Cited By (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8615238B2 (en) 2001-06-25 2013-12-24 Ericsson Evdo Inc. Radio network control
US20110065464A1 (en) * 2001-10-12 2011-03-17 Sae-Young Chung Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station
US8140091B2 (en) 2001-10-12 2012-03-20 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Boosting a signal-to-interference ratio of a mobile station
US9661519B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2017-05-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient reporting of information in a wireless communication system
US9603102B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2017-03-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Method of transmitting pilot tones in a multi-sector cell, including null pilot tones, for generating channel quality indicators
US9544860B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2017-01-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Pilot signals for use in multi-sector cells
US7983708B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2011-07-19 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Reverse link power control
US20050243749A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Sepehr Mehrabanzad Reverse link power control
US7843892B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2010-11-30 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Reverse link power control
US20050245279A1 (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-03 Sepehr Mehrabanzad Reverse link power control
US8111253B2 (en) 2005-07-28 2012-02-07 Airvana Network Solutions, Inc. Controlling usage capacity in a radio access network
US20070026884A1 (en) * 2005-07-28 2007-02-01 Prashanth Rao Controlling usage capacity in a radio access network
US20070140168A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-06-21 Rajiv Laroia Methods and apparatus for determining, communicating and using information which can be used for interference control
US9191840B2 (en) * 2005-10-14 2015-11-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for determining, communicating and using information which can be used for interference control
US9572179B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2017-02-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating transmission backlog information
US10159006B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2018-12-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for reporting and/or using control information
US9451491B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-09-20 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus relating to generating and transmitting initial and additional control information report sets in a wireless system
US9462604B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-10-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus related to selecting a request group for a request report
US9473265B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-10-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating information utilizing a plurality of dictionaries
US10959120B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2021-03-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus related to selecting control channel reporting formats
US9338767B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus of implementing and/or using a dedicated control channel
US10645693B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2020-05-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus of implementing and/or using a control channel
US9578654B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2017-02-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus related to selecting reporting alternative in a request report
US9338795B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2016-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating transmission backlog information
US9893917B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2018-02-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for communicating control information
US7926098B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2011-04-12 Airvana, Corp. Handoff of a secure connection among gateways
US8165528B2 (en) 2007-12-27 2012-04-24 Airvana, Corp. Interference mitigation in wireless networks
US20090170547A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2009-07-02 Balaji Raghothaman Interference mitigation in wireless networks
US10244507B2 (en) 2013-09-24 2019-03-26 Andrew Wireless Systems Gmbh Distributed processing in a centralized radio access network
US9491051B2 (en) * 2014-05-29 2016-11-08 Cisco Technology, Inc. Centralized adjustment of data rates in mesh networks
US9686379B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2017-06-20 Commscope Technologies Llc Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems
US9954584B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2018-04-24 Commscope Technologies Llc Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems
US10020851B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2018-07-10 Commscope Technologies Llc Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems
US9596322B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2017-03-14 Commscope Technologies Llc Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems
US10333591B2 (en) 2014-06-11 2019-06-25 Commscope Technologies Llc Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7729243B2 (en) 2010-06-01
US20060159045A1 (en) 2006-07-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7729243B2 (en) Reverse link rate and stability control
RU2391798C2 (en) Use of resources application messages in mac with multiple carriers to achieve parity
Vasan et al. ECHOS-enhanced capacity 802.11 hotspots
EP1236283B1 (en) Transmission power control of a mobile station
US7738907B2 (en) Method and apparatus for uplink power control in a frequency division multiple access communication system
KR101217439B1 (en) Method and system for reselecting an access point
EP1704659B1 (en) Wireless communication method and apparatus for optimizing the performance of access points
US7532892B2 (en) Method and device for controlling admission of users to a cellular radio network
US20050152320A1 (en) Wireless communication method and apparatus for balancing the loads of access points by controlling access point transmission power levels
US9143950B2 (en) Method and corresponding system for spectrum management
US20050153702A1 (en) Radio resource management in wireless local area networks
GB2490607A (en) Assigning channels to wireless access points based on a determined neighbour impact metric
KR100610035B1 (en) A method and apparatus for terminating a burst transmission in a wireless system
KR101140236B1 (en) A radio telecommunications network, and a method of selecting base station antennas for connection with a mobile user terminal
KR20020008219A (en) Monitoring of cdma load and frequency reuse based on reverse link signal-to-noise ratio
US10171159B1 (en) Donor selection for relay access nodes using reference signal boosting
JP4828874B2 (en) Establishing or releasing a wireless connection between a mobile station and a cell for wireless communication
JP2007527656A (en) Method and system capable of reusing time slots assigned to a common control channel for user traffic
MXPA05005194A (en) Wireless communication rate shaping.
US9445290B2 (en) Method for problematic user detection
EP3162151B1 (en) Radio resource management for packet data services
US20060262763A1 (en) Method and corresponding system for load balancing
EP4075878A1 (en) Determining coverage access
CN112996057B (en) Load balancing method and system based on distributed wireless network
EP1772035B1 (en) Method and system for controlling admission in mobile communication networks, related network and computer program product therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRVANA, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ANANTHAIYER, SATISH;CHUNG, SAE-YOUNG;MEHRABANZAD, SEPEHR;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050322 TO 20050405;REEL/FRAME:024142/0733

AS Assignment

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, NEW YORK

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AIRVANA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024213/0355

Effective date: 20100409

AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AIRVANA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024804/0404

Effective date: 20100716

AS Assignment

Owner name: SOCIETE GENERALE, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC.;REEL/FRAME:024917/0171

Effective date: 20100827

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRVANA NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 024917/0171;ASSIGNOR:SOCIETE GENERALE;REEL/FRAME:029686/0007

Effective date: 20130123