US20110249642A1 - Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination - Google Patents

Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110249642A1
US20110249642A1 US13/084,763 US201113084763A US2011249642A1 US 20110249642 A1 US20110249642 A1 US 20110249642A1 US 201113084763 A US201113084763 A US 201113084763A US 2011249642 A1 US2011249642 A1 US 2011249642A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
base station
resource partitioning
proposed
proposed resource
partitioning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/084,763
Inventor
Osok Song
Aleksandar Damnjanovic
Tingfang JI
Parag Arun Agashe
Jaber Mohammad Borran
Madhavan Srinivasan Vajapeyam
Stefan Geirhofer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Qualcomm Inc
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Qualcomm Inc filed Critical Qualcomm Inc
Priority to US13/084,763 priority Critical patent/US20110249642A1/en
Priority to ES11717398.9T priority patent/ES2534640T3/en
Priority to CN201180024519.8A priority patent/CN102907135B/en
Priority to PCT/US2011/032360 priority patent/WO2011130438A1/en
Priority to EP11717398.9A priority patent/EP2559291B1/en
Priority to KR1020127029715A priority patent/KR101495530B1/en
Priority to JP2013505109A priority patent/JP5766785B2/en
Assigned to QUALCOMM INCORPORATED reassignment QUALCOMM INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: VAJAPEYAM, MADHAVAN SRINIVASAN, AGASHE, PARAG ARUN, BORRAN, JABER MOHAMMAD, DAMNJANOVIC, ALEKSANDAR, GEIRHOFER, STEFAN, JI, TINGFANG, SONG, OSOK
Publication of US20110249642A1 publication Critical patent/US20110249642A1/en
Priority to JP2015031606A priority patent/JP2015136134A/en
Priority to US15/969,516 priority patent/US10674407B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W92/00Interfaces specially adapted for wireless communication networks
    • H04W92/16Interfaces between hierarchically similar devices
    • H04W92/20Interfaces between hierarchically similar devices between access points
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/16Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]

Definitions

  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communications, and more specifically to adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC).
  • eICIC enhanced inter-cell interference coordination
  • Wireless communication networks are widely deployed to provide various communication services such as voice, video, packet data, messaging, broadcast, etc. These wireless networks may be multiple-access networks capable of supporting multiple users by sharing the available network resources. Examples of such multiple-access networks include Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) networks, Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) networks, Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) networks, Orthogonal FDMA (OFDMA) networks, and Single-Carrier FDMA (SC-FDMA) networks.
  • CDMA Code Division Multiple Access
  • TDMA Time Division Multiple Access
  • FDMA Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • OFDMA Orthogonal FDMA
  • SC-FDMA Single-Carrier FDMA
  • a wireless communication network may include a number of base stations that can support communication for a number of user equipments (UEs).
  • UE user equipments
  • a UE may communicate with a base station via the downlink and uplink.
  • the downlink (or forward link) refers to the communication link from the base station to the UE
  • the uplink (or reverse link) refers to the communication link from the UE to the base station.
  • a base station may transmit data and control information on the downlink to a UE and/or may receive data and control information on the uplink from the UE.
  • a transmission from the base station may observe interference due to transmissions from neighbor base stations.
  • a transmission from the UE may cause interference to transmissions from other UEs communicating with the neighbor base stations. The interference may degrade performance on both the downlink and uplink.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a method for wireless communications.
  • the method generally includes sending, from a first base station, a resource status message to a second base station; receiving, at the first base station from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and scheduling resources at the first base station based on the received resource partitioning.
  • the apparatus generally includes means for sending a resource status message to a base station; means for receiving, from the base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and means for scheduling resources based on the received resource partitioning.
  • the apparatus generally includes processor transmitter, a receiver, and a scheduler.
  • the transmitter is typically configured to send a resource status message to a base station
  • the receiver is configured to receive, from the base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message.
  • the scheduler is generally configured to schedule resources based on the received resource partitioning.
  • the computer-program product typically includes a computer-readable medium having code for sending, from a first base station, a resource status message to a second base station; for receiving, at the first base station from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and for scheduling resources at the first base station based on the received resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a method for wireless communications.
  • the method generally includes receiving, at a first base station, a resource status message from a second base station; determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station; determining proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters; and sending, from the first base station to the second base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
  • the apparatus generally includes means for receiving a resource status message from a base station, means for determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the apparatus, means for determining proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station based on the received resource status message and the parameters, and means for sending, to the base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
  • the apparatus generally includes a receiver, at least one processor, and a transmitter.
  • the receiver is typically configured to receive a resource status message from a base station.
  • the at least one processor is generally configured to determine one or more parameters related to resource usage at the apparatus and to determine proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station based on the received resource status message and the parameters.
  • the transmitter is typically configured to send an indication of the proposed resource partitioning to the second base station.
  • the computer-program product typically includes a computer-readable medium having code for receiving, at a first base station, a resource status message from a second base station; for determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station; for determining proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters; and for sending, from the first base station to the second base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a wireless a communications network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a frame structure in a wireless communications network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2A is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of an uplink allocation of resources in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a Node B in communication with a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communications network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • UE user equipment
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example heterogeneous network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates example resource partitioning in a heterogeneous network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates example cooperative partitioning of subframes in a heterogeneous network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example call-flow diagram for scheduling resources at a first base station based on proposed resource partitioning from a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example extended boundary area (EBA) between two negotiating cells in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • EBA extended boundary area
  • FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks executed to schedule resources at a first base station based on received proposed resource partitioning between the first and a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks executed to determine and propose resource partitioning between a first and second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • a CDMA network may implement a radio technology such as Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA), cdma2000, etc.
  • UTRA includes Wideband CDMA (WCDMA) and other variants of CDMA.
  • cdma2000 covers IS-2000, IS-95 and IS-856 standards.
  • a TDMA network may implement a radio technology such as Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM).
  • GSM Global System for Mobile Communications
  • An OFDMA network may implement a radio technology such as Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA), Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB), IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi), IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX), IEEE 802.20, Flash-OFDM®, etc.
  • E-UTRA Evolved UTRA
  • UMB Ultra Mobile Broadband
  • IEEE 802.11 Wi-Fi
  • WiMAX IEEE 802.16
  • Flash-OFDM® Flash-OFDM®
  • UTRA and E-UTRA are part of Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS).
  • 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) are new releases of UMTS that use E-UTRA.
  • UTRA, E-UTRA, UMTS, LTE, LTE-A and GSM are described in documents from an organization named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP).
  • cdma2000 and UMB are described in documents from an organization named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2).
  • 3GPP2 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2
  • the techniques described herein may be used for the wireless networks and radio technologies mentioned above as well as other wireless networks and radio technologies. For clarity, certain aspects of the techniques are described below for LTE, and LTE terminology is used in much of the description below.
  • FIG. 1 shows a wireless communication network 100 , which may be an LTE network.
  • the wireless network 100 may include a number of evolved Node Bs (eNBs) 110 and other network entities.
  • An eNB may be a station that communicates with user equipment devices (UEs) and may also be referred to as a base station, a Node B, an access point, etc.
  • Each eNB 110 may provide communication coverage for a particular geographic area.
  • the term “cell” can refer to a coverage area of an eNB and/or an eNB subsystem serving this coverage area, depending on the context in which the term is used.
  • An eNB may provide communication coverage for a macro cell, a pico cell, a femto cell, and/or other types of cell.
  • a macro cell may cover a relatively large geographic area (e.g., several kilometers in radius) and may allow unrestricted access by UEs with service subscription.
  • a pico cell may cover a relatively small geographic area and may allow unrestricted access by UEs with service subscription.
  • a femto cell may cover a relatively small geographic area (e.g., a home) and may allow restricted access by UEs having association with the femto cell (e.g., UEs in a Closed Subscriber Group (CSG), UEs for users in the home, etc.).
  • CSG Closed Subscriber Group
  • An eNB for a macro cell may be referred to as a macro eNB.
  • An eNB for a pico cell may be referred to as a pico eNB.
  • An eNB for a femto cell may be referred to as a femto eNB or a home eNB.
  • eNBs 110 a , 110 b , and 110 c may be macro eNBs for macro cells 102 a , 102 b , and 102 c , respectively.
  • eNB 110 x may be a pico eNB for a pico cell 102 x .
  • eNBs 110 y and 110 z may be femto eNBs for femto cells 102 y and 102 z , respectively.
  • An eNB may support one or multiple (e.g., three) cells.
  • the wireless network 100 may also include relay stations.
  • a relay station is a station that receives a transmission of data and/or other information from an upstream station (e.g., an eNB or a UE) and sends a transmission of the data and/or other information to a downstream station (e.g., a UE or an eNB).
  • a relay station may also be a UE that relays transmissions for other UEs.
  • a relay station 110 r may communicate with eNB 110 a and a UE 120 r in order to facilitate communication between eNB 110 a and UE 120 r .
  • a relay station may also be referred to as a relay eNB, a relay, etc.
  • the wireless network 100 may be a heterogeneous network (HetNet) that includes eNBs of different types, e.g., macro eNBs, pico eNBs, femto eNBs, relays, etc. These different types of eNBs may have different transmit power levels, different coverage areas, and different impact on interference in the wireless network 100 .
  • HetNet HetNet
  • macro eNBs may have a high transmit power level (e.g., 20 watts) whereas pico eNBs, femto eNBs and relays may have a lower transmit power level (e.g., 1 watt).
  • the wireless network 100 may support synchronous or asynchronous operation.
  • the eNBs may have similar frame timing, and transmissions from different eNBs may be approximately aligned in time.
  • the eNBs may have different frame timing, and transmissions from different eNBs may not be aligned in time.
  • the techniques described herein may be used for both synchronous and asynchronous operation.
  • a network controller 130 may couple to a set of eNBs and provide coordination and control for these eNBs.
  • the network controller 130 may communicate with the eNBs 110 via a backhaul.
  • the eNBs 110 may also communicate with one another, e.g., directly or indirectly via wireless or wireline backhaul.
  • the UEs 120 may be dispersed throughout the wireless network 100 , and each UE may be stationary or mobile.
  • a UE may also be referred to as a terminal, a mobile station, a subscriber unit, a station, etc.
  • a UE may be a cellular phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a wireless modem, a wireless communication device, a handheld device, a laptop computer, a cordless phone, a wireless local loop (WLL) station, a tablet, etc.
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • WLL wireless local loop
  • a UE may be able to communicate with macro eNBs, pico eNBs, femto eNBs, relays, etc.
  • a solid line with double arrows indicates desired transmissions between a UE and a serving eNB, which is an eNB designated to serve the UE on the downlink and/or uplink.
  • a dashed line with double arrows indicates interfering transmissions between a UE and an eNB.
  • LTE utilizes orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) on the downlink and single-carrier frequency division multiplexing (SC-FDM) on the uplink.
  • OFDM and SC-FDM partition the system bandwidth into multiple (K) orthogonal subcarriers, which are also commonly referred to as tones, bins, etc.
  • K orthogonal subcarriers
  • Each subcarrier may be modulated with data.
  • modulation symbols are sent in the frequency domain with OFDM and in the time domain with SC-FDM.
  • the spacing between adjacent subcarriers may be fixed, and the total number of subcarriers (K) may be dependent on the system bandwidth.
  • K may be equal to 128, 256, 512, 1024, or 2048 for system bandwidth of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 megahertz (MHz), respectively.
  • the system bandwidth may also be partitioned into subbands.
  • a subband may cover 1.08 MHz, and there may be 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 subbands for system bandwidth of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 MHz, respectively.
  • FIG. 2 shows a frame structure used in LTE.
  • the transmission timeline for the downlink may be partitioned into units of radio frames.
  • Each radio frame may have a predetermined duration (e.g., 10 milliseconds (ms)) and may be partitioned into 10 subframes with indices of 0 through 9.
  • Each subframe may include two slots.
  • Each radio frame may thus include 20 slots with indices of 0 through 19.
  • the 2L symbol periods in each subframe may be assigned indices of 0 through 2L ⁇ 1.
  • the available time frequency resources may be partitioned into resource blocks.
  • Each resource block may cover N subcarriers (e.g., 12 subcarriers) in one slot.
  • an eNB may send a primary synchronization signal (PSS) and a secondary synchronization signal (SSS) for each cell in the eNB.
  • PSS primary synchronization signal
  • SSS secondary synchronization signal
  • the primary and secondary synchronization signals may be sent in symbol periods 6 and 5 , respectively, in each of subframes 0 and 5 of each radio frame with the normal cyclic prefix, as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the synchronization signals may be used by UEs for cell detection and acquisition.
  • the eNB may send a Physical Broadcast Channel (PBCH) in symbol periods 0 to 3 in slot 1 of subframe 0 .
  • the PBCH may carry certain system information.
  • the eNB may send a Physical Control Format Indicator Channel (PCFICH) in the first symbol period of each subframe, as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • the PCFICH may convey the number of symbol periods (M) used for control channels, where M may be equal to 1, 2, or 3 and may change from subframe to subframe. M may also be equal to 4 for a small system bandwidth, e.g., with less than 10 resource blocks.
  • the eNB may send a Physical HARQ Indicator Channel (PHICH) and a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) in the first M symbol periods of each subframe (not shown in FIG. 2 ).
  • the PHICH may carry information to support hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ).
  • HARQ hybrid automatic repeat request
  • the PDCCH may carry information on resource allocation for UEs and control information for downlink channels.
  • the eNB may send a Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) in the remaining symbol periods of each subframe.
  • PDSCH may carry data for UEs scheduled for data transmission on the downlink.
  • E-UTRA Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access
  • Physical Channels and Modulation which is publicly available.
  • the eNB may send the PSS, SSS, and PBCH in the center 1.08 MHz of the system bandwidth used by the eNB.
  • the eNB may send the PCFICH and PHICH across the entire system bandwidth in each symbol period in which these channels are sent.
  • the eNB may send the PDCCH to groups of UEs in certain portions of the system bandwidth.
  • the eNB may send the PDSCH to specific UEs in specific portions of the system bandwidth.
  • the eNB may send the PSS, SSS, PBCH, PCFICH, and PHICH in a broadcast manner to all UEs, may send the PDCCH in a unicast manner to specific UEs, and may also send the PDSCH in a unicast manner to specific UEs.
  • a number of resource elements may be available in each symbol period. Each resource element may cover one subcarrier in one symbol period and may be used to send one modulation symbol, which may be a real or complex value. Resource elements not used for a reference signal in each symbol period may be arranged into resource element groups (REGs). Each REG may include four resource elements in one symbol period.
  • the PCFICH may occupy four REGs, which may be spaced approximately equally across frequency, in symbol period 0 .
  • the PHICH may occupy three REGs, which may be spread across frequency, in one or more configurable symbol periods. For example, the three REGs for the PHICH may all belong in symbol period 0 or may be spread in symbol periods 0 , 1 , and 2 .
  • the PDCCH may occupy 9, 18, 32, or 64 REGs, which may be selected from the available REGs, in the first M symbol periods. Only certain combinations of REGs may be allowed for the PDCCH.
  • a UE may know the specific REGs used for the PHICH and the PCFICH.
  • the UE may search different combinations of REGs for the PDCCH.
  • the number of combinations to search is typically less than the number of allowed combinations for the PDCCH.
  • An eNB may send the PDCCH to the UE in any of the combinations that the UE will search.
  • FIG. 2A shows an exemplary format 200 A for the uplink in LTE.
  • the available resource blocks for the uplink may be partitioned into a data section and a control section.
  • the control section may be formed at the two edges of the system bandwidth and may have a configurable size.
  • the resource blocks in the control section may be assigned to UEs for transmission of control information.
  • the data section may include all resource blocks not included in the control section.
  • the design in FIG. 2A results in the data section including contiguous subcarriers, which may allow a single UE to be assigned all of the contiguous subcarriers in the data section.
  • a UE may be assigned resource blocks in the control section to transmit control information to an eNB.
  • the UE may also be assigned resource blocks in the data section to transmit data to the eNB.
  • the UE may transmit control information in a Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) 210 on the assigned resource blocks in the control section.
  • the UE may transmit only data or both data and control information in a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) 220 on the assigned resource blocks in the data section.
  • An uplink transmission may span both slots of a subframe and may hop across frequency as shown in FIG. 2A .
  • a UE may be within the coverage of multiple eNBs.
  • One of these eNBs may be selected to serve the UE.
  • the serving eNB may be selected based on various criteria such as received power, pathloss, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), etc.
  • a UE may operate in a dominant interference scenario in which the UE may observe high interference from one or more interfering eNBs.
  • a dominant interference scenario may occur due to restricted association.
  • UE 120 y may be close to femto eNB 110 y and may have high received power for eNB 110 y .
  • UE 120 y may not be able to access femto eNB 110 y due to restricted association and may then connect to macro eNB 110 c with lower received power (as shown in FIG. 1 ) or to femto eNB 110 z also with lower received power (not shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • UE 120 y may then observe high interference from femto eNB 110 y on the downlink and may also cause high interference to eNB 110 y on the uplink.
  • a dominant interference scenario may also occur due to range extension, which is a scenario in which a UE connects to an eNB with lower pathloss and lower SNR among all eNBs detected by the UE.
  • range extension is a scenario in which a UE connects to an eNB with lower pathloss and lower SNR among all eNBs detected by the UE.
  • UE 120 x may detect macro eNB 110 b and pico eNB 110 x and may have lower received power for eNB 110 x than eNB 110 b . Nevertheless, it may be desirable for UE 120 x to connect to pico eNB 110 x if the pathloss for eNB 110 x is lower than the pathloss for macro eNB 110 b . This may result in less interference to the wireless network for a given data rate for UE 120 x.
  • a frequency band is a range of frequencies that may be used for communication and may be given by (i) a center frequency and a bandwidth or (ii) a lower frequency and an upper frequency.
  • a frequency band may also be referred to as a band, a frequency channel, etc.
  • the frequency bands for different eNBs may be selected such that a UE can communicate with a weaker eNB in a dominant interference scenario while allowing a strong eNB to communicate with its UEs.
  • An eNB may be classified as a “weak” eNB or a “strong” eNB based on the received power of signals from the eNB received at a UE (and not based on the transmit power level of the eNB).
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a design of a base station or an eNB 110 and a UE 120 , which may be one of the base stations/eNBs and one of the UEs in FIG. 1 .
  • the eNB 110 may be macro eNB 110 c in FIG. 1
  • the UE 120 may be UE 120 y .
  • the eNB 110 may also be a base station of some other type.
  • the eNB 110 may be equipped with T antennas 334 a through 334 t
  • the UE 120 may be equipped with R antennas 352 a through 352 r , where in general T ⁇ 1 and R ⁇ 1.
  • a transmit processor 320 may receive data from a data source 312 and control information from a controller/processor 340 .
  • the control information may be for the PBCH, PCFICH, PHICH, PDCCH, etc.
  • the data may be for the PDSCH, etc.
  • the transmit processor 320 may process (e.g., encode and symbol map) the data and control information to obtain data symbols and control symbols, respectively.
  • the transmit processor 320 may also generate reference symbols, e.g., for the PSS, SSS, and cell-specific reference signal.
  • a transmit (TX) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) processor 330 may perform spatial processing (e.g., precoding) on the data symbols, the control symbols, and/or the reference symbols, if applicable, and may provide T output symbol streams to T modulators (MODs) 332 a through 332 t .
  • Each modulator 332 may process a respective output symbol stream (e.g., for OFDM, etc.) to obtain an output sample stream.
  • Each modulator 332 may further process (e.g., convert to analog, amplify, filter, and upconvert) the output sample stream to obtain a downlink signal.
  • T downlink signals from modulators 332 a through 332 t may be transmitted via T antennas 334 a through 334 t , respectively.
  • antennas 352 a through 352 r may receive the downlink signals from the eNB 110 and may provide received signals to demodulators (DEMODs) 354 a through 354 r , respectively.
  • Each demodulator 354 may condition (e.g., filter, amplify, downconvert, and digitize) a respective received signal to obtain input samples.
  • Each demodulator 354 may further process the input samples (e.g., for OFDM, etc.) to obtain received symbols.
  • a MIMO detector 356 may obtain received symbols from all R demodulators 354 a through 354 r , perform MIMO detection on the received symbols, if applicable, and provide detected symbols.
  • a receive processor 358 may process (e.g., demodulate, deinterleave, and decode) the detected symbols, provide decoded data for the UE 120 to a data sink 360 , and provide decoded control information to a controller/processor 380 .
  • a transmit processor 364 may receive and process data (e.g., for the PUSCH) from a data source 362 and control information (e.g., for the PUCCH) from the controller/processor 380 .
  • the transmit processor 364 may also generate reference symbols for a reference signal.
  • the symbols from the transmit processor 364 may be precoded by a TX MIMO processor 366 if applicable, further processed by modulators 354 a through 354 r (e.g., for SC-FDM, etc.), and transmitted to the eNB 110 .
  • the uplink signals from the UE 120 may be received by the antennas 334 , processed by demodulators 332 , detected by a MIMO detector 336 if applicable, and further processed by a receive processor 338 to obtain decoded data and control information sent by the UE 120 .
  • the receive processor 338 may provide the decoded data to a data sink 339 and the decoded control information to the controller/processor 340 .
  • the controllers/processors 340 and 380 may direct the operation at the eNB 110 and the UE 120 , respectively.
  • the controller/processor 340 and/or other processors and modules at the eNB 110 may perform or direct operations for blocks 900 in FIG. 9 , operations for blocks 1000 in FIG. 10 , and/or other processes for the techniques described herein.
  • the memories 342 , 382 may store data and program codes for the eNB 110 and the UE 120 , respectively.
  • a scheduler 344 may schedule UEs for data transmission on the downlink and/or uplink.
  • the base stations may negotiate with each other to coordinate resources in order to reduce/eliminate interference by the interfering cell giving up part of its resources.
  • eICIC enhanced inter-cell interference coordination
  • the base stations may negotiate with each other to coordinate resources in order to reduce/eliminate interference by the interfering cell giving up part of its resources.
  • a UE may be able to access a serving cell even with severe interference by using the resources yielded by the interfering cell.
  • a femto cell with a closed access mode i.e., only a member femto UE can access the cell
  • a closed access mode i.e., only a member femto UE can access the cell
  • a coverage hole for the macro cell.
  • the macro UE under the femto cell coverage area may still be able to access the UE's serving macro cell using these yielded resources.
  • the yielded resources may be time based, frequency based, or a combination of both.
  • the interfering cell may simply not use some of the subframes in the time domain.
  • the yielded resources i.e., the coordinated resource partitioning
  • the interfering cell may yield subcarriers in the frequency domain.
  • the coordinated resource partitioning is a combination of both frequency and time, the interfering cell may yield certain frequency and time resources.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example scenario where eICIC may allow a macro UE 120 y supporting eICIC (e.g., a Rel-10 macro UE as shown in FIG. 4 ) to access the macro cell 110 c even when the macro UE 120 y is experiencing severe interference from the femto cell 110 y , as illustrated by the solid radio link 402 .
  • a legacy macro UE 120 u e.g., a Rel-8 macro UE as shown in FIG. 4
  • a femto UE 120 v may access the femto cell 110 y without any interference problems from the macro cell 110 c.
  • networks may support eICIC, where there may be different sets of partitioning information.
  • a first of these sets may be referred to as Semi-Static Resource Partitioning Information (SRPI).
  • a second of these sets may be referred to as Adaptive Resource Partitioning Information (ARPI).
  • SRPI typically does not change frequently, and SRPI may be sent to a UE so that the UE can use the resource partitioning information for the UE's own operations.
  • the resource partitioning may be implemented with 8 ms periodicity (8 subframes) or 40 ms periodicity (40 subframes).
  • FDD frequency division duplexing
  • a partitioning pattern may be mapped to a known subframe (e.g., a first subframe of each radio frame that has a system frame number (SFN) value that is a multiple of an integer N, such as 4).
  • SFN system frame number
  • N such as 4
  • RPI resource partitioning information
  • a subframe that is subject to coordinated resource partitioning (e.g., yielded by an interfering cell) for the downlink may be identified by an index:
  • the SRPI mapping may be shifted, for example, by 4 ms.
  • an example for the uplink may be:
  • SRPI may use the following three values for each entry:
  • SRPI SRPI Another possible set of parameters for SRPI may be the following:
  • the serving cell's SRPI may be broadcasted over the air.
  • the SRPI of the serving cell may be sent in a master information block (MIB), or one of the system information blocks (SIBs).
  • MIB master information block
  • SIBs system information blocks
  • a predefined SRPI may be defined based on the characteristics of cells, e.g. macro cell, pico cell (with open access), and femto cell (with closed access). In such a case, encoding of SRPI in the system overhead message may result in more efficient broadcasting over the air.
  • the base station may also broadcast the neighbor cell's SRPI in one of the SIBs.
  • SRPI may be sent with its corresponding range of physical cell identities (PCIs).
  • PCIs physical cell identities
  • ARPI may represent further resource partitioning information with the detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes in SRPI.
  • detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes is typically known only to the base stations, and a UE does not know it.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate examples of SRPI assignment in the scenario with macro and femto cells.
  • HetNets heterogeneous networks
  • a cell may be silent on a particular subframe, allowing users from a neighbor cell that are under its coverage to be served.
  • TDM time-division multiplexing
  • eNBs in close proximity to each other may likely be from the same vendor.
  • proprietary signaling and collaboration among neighbors may be possible and, perhaps, preferred.
  • adaptive resource partitioning may not be limited to current measurement and signaling techniques.
  • Load balancing in homogeneous networks may imply changing the bias of each cell to match the load. As a result, more even distribution of offered load may be achieved. However, a lower UE SNR may be used since the strongest cell may not be used.
  • HetNets In HetNets, a similar concept may be used with enhancement. As a result, a more even distribution of offered load may be achievable, and a UE's SNR may be controlled via resource partitioning. According to certain aspects, HetNet designs may include tight coupling of load balancing (handover) and resource partitioning. Decoupling load balancing and resource partitioning may be challenging, but desirable.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a peer-to-peer negotiation algorithm between eNB 1 110 1 and eNB 2 110 2 , according to certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • eNB 1 110 1 may determine one or more resource-related parameters associated with eNB 1 and, at 704 , eNB 2 110 2 may determine one or more resource-related parameters associated with eNB 2 .
  • eNB 1 110 1 may send a resource status report (RSR) to eNB 2 at 706 .
  • RSR resource status report
  • communication between eNB 1 and eNB 2 such as the RSR, may be sent via an X2 backhaul coupling the two eNBs.
  • eNB 2 may determine a proposed resource partitioning at 708 and may transmit a resource partitioning update request message at 710 to eNB 1 , indicating this proposed partitioning.
  • eNB 1 may reject the proposed partitioning indicated by the received resource partitioning update message for various reasons and, in response, may transmit a resource partitioning update reject message at 712 to eNB 2 , in an effort to indicate this rejection to eNB 2 .
  • eNB 2 may determine another proposed resource partitioning at 714 and may transmit another resource partitioning update request message at 716 to eNB 1 .
  • eNB 1 may accept the proposed resource partitioning indicated by the received request message and may send a resource partitioning update accept message at 718 to eNB 2 , indicating this acceptance to eNB 2 .
  • eNB 1 may schedule resources accordingly at 720 .
  • This process of determining a proposed resource partitioning and sending an indication of the proposed resource partitioning in an update request message may be repeated until eNB 1 accepts the proposed resource partitioning and eNB 2 receives an update accept message indicating this acceptance by eNB 1 .
  • the originally proposed resource partitioning determined at 708 may be accepted by eNB 1 after receipt of the update request message at 710 .
  • the flow in FIG. 7 may jump down to eNB 1 sending a resource partitioning update accept message at 718 to eNB 2 , indicating this acceptance to eNB 2 .
  • eNB 1 may schedule resources accordingly at 720 .
  • received resource partitioning update request messages at 710 or 716 may indicate one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs, also termed ABSFs) of eNB 2 110 2 .
  • ABSFs almost blank subframes
  • the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning may comprise a load information message indicating the ABSs.
  • the load information message may comprise one or more information elements (IEs) indicating the ABSs.
  • each pair of nodes may negotiate a partitioning rule between them. This does not preclude master-slave type of negotiation (e.g., a macro base station may have the final say when negotiating with a femto base station). As a result, each cell may have a set of ARPIs.
  • X2-based communication may be used as negotiation links between two cells.
  • a link may be established based on UE radio resource management (RRM) reports, for example using automatic neighbor relation (ANR) method (e.g., RSRP (neighbor cell) ⁇ RSRP (serving cell) ⁇ threshold, where RSRP is a reference signal receive power).
  • ANR automatic neighbor relation
  • an extended boundary area may be defined as an area between two negotiating cells under which a UE would prefer protected resources to be scheduled.
  • adaptive partitioning may be adaptable to bursty traffic. This may be different depending on the appropriate priority of guaranteed bit rate (GBR) versus non-GBR traffic.
  • GBR may have absolute priority in the negotiation.
  • a physical resource block (PRB) usage metric may be used to capture the burstiness of traffic and load of a cell. If full load is reached by both cells, fairness criteria may be used as a tie-breaker to update the algorithm.
  • PRB physical resource block
  • SRPI does not change frequently and may use the following three values for each entry as described above: U, N, or X.
  • ARPI represents further resource partitioning information with the detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes in SRPI.
  • the detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes is only known to the eNBs, and a UE does not know it.
  • eNBs may use X2 messages or over-the-air messages (OAMs) to negotiate ARPI configuration.
  • ARPI may use the following values for each entry:
  • the initial X subframes of SRPI may be set to ‘AC’ in ARPI.
  • an X2 setup procedure and an eNB configuration update procedure may be used. This can be triggered by a UE's measurement report and as part of an ANR procedure.
  • eNB class and access mode may be exchanged, including whether the eNB is a macro eNB, a femto eNB (closed access home eNB (HeNB)), or a pico eNB (open access HeNB).
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example EBA between two negotiating cells, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • EBA(i,j) 806 may be defined as the EBA of cell i 804 due to interfering cell j 802 .
  • a UE 120 in EBA(i,j) 806 may be served only through the UE's interference cancellation and the eNB's interference coordination by resource partitioning between the serving eNB 110 of cell i 804 and interfering eNB 110 of cell j 802 .
  • the center(i) 808 may be considered as the rest of the coverage area of cell i 804 except for the sum of EBA(i,j) 806 .
  • the EBA of a macro cell in femto-macro scenario may be defined as the femto cell coverage under the macro cell coverage.
  • the ARPI (i,center) may be considered the ARPI of cell i for UEs not in the EBA.
  • N(i) may be considered the total number of UEs of cell i.
  • the upper layer may provide the scheduler, such as the scheduler 344 of FIG. 3 , with certain information.
  • This information may include, for each UE, the EBA that the UE belongs to.
  • the upper layer may track the UE's EBA by proper setting of an A3 event and the corresponding measurement report.
  • an event triggers a report
  • an A3 event indicates when a neighbor cell becomes better than an offset relative to the serving cell.
  • the U/AU subframes of ARPI(i,j), j 1 . . .
  • n may determine the available resources for the UE in EBA(i,j), while the U/AU/AC subframes of ARPI(i,center) may determine the available resources for the UE in center(i).
  • the upper layer may also provide the scheduler with filtering time windows for measurement and frequency of reporting. The scheduler may use the above information while scheduling resources for the UEs.
  • neighbor eNBs may exchange the parameters defined above.
  • the eNBs may exchange serving cell (cell i) parameters from the MAC layer and neighboring cell parameters from cell j via backhaul messages.
  • the eNBs may exchange new ARPI(i,j) based on internal algorithms to maximize, or at least increase, system performance and fairness. If a new ARPI(i,j) is different from the current ARPI(i,j), the eNB of cell i may start negotiation with an eNB of cell j by sending a resource partitioning update request message.
  • FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks 900 executed to schedule resources at a first base station based on received resource partitioning from a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • the blocks 900 may be performed, for example, by an eNB 110 as the first base station, and the second base station may also be an eNB 110 , which may be of a different class and/or have a different access mode than the first base station in a HetNet.
  • the second base station may be a macro base station, whereas the first base station may be a femto or a pico base station.
  • a first base station may send a resource status message to a second base station.
  • the first base station may receive, from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning may be based on the resource status message.
  • the first base station may schedule resources based on the received resource partitioning.
  • the first base station may send to the second base station a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the first base station.
  • the first base station may receive, from the second base station before receiving the message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, another message indicating another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, may reject the other proposed resource partitioning, and may send, to the second base station, a notification of the rejected proposed resource partitioning.
  • the first base station may determine one or more parameters related to resource status associated with the first base station, wherein the resource status message indicates the parameters.
  • FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks 1000 executed to determine a proposed resource partitioning between a first and a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • the blocks 1000 may be performed, for example, by an eNB 110 as the first base station, and the second base station may also be an eNB 110 , which may be of a different class and/or have a different access mode than the first base station in a HetNet.
  • the first base station may be a macro base station
  • the second base station may be a pico or a femto base station.
  • a first base station may receive a resource status message from a second base station.
  • the first base station may determine one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station.
  • the first base station may determine proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters.
  • the first base station may send the proposed resource partitioning to the second base station.
  • the first base station may receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the second base station.
  • the first base station may receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was rejected by the second base station, may determine another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, and may send, to the second base station, another message indicating the other proposed resource partitioning.
  • the first base station may determine a current resource partitioning between the first and second base stations before receiving a resource status message from a second base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is sent only if the proposed resource partitioning is different than the current resource partitioning.
  • the first base station may schedule resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the first base station for UEs in an area covered only by the first base station.
  • the various operations of methods described above may be performed by any suitable means capable of performing the corresponding functions.
  • the means may include various hardware and/or software component(s) and/or module(s), including, but not limited to a circuit, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or processor.
  • means for transmitting or means for sending may comprise an interface coupled between a network backhaul and the controller/processor 340 of the eNB 110 of FIG. 3 or a transmitter, a modulator 332 , and/or an antenna 334 of the eNB 110 shown in FIG. 3 .
  • Means for receiving may comprise an interface coupled between a network backhaul and the controller/processor 340 of the eNB 110 of FIG.
  • Means for processing, means for determining, means for using, means for scheduling, and/or means for rejecting may comprise a processing system, which may include at least one processor, such as the transmit processor 320 , the receive processor 338 , and/or the controller/processor 340 of the eNB 110 illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • Means for scheduling may also comprise a scheduler 344 of the eNB 110 depicted in FIG. 3 .
  • DSP digital signal processor
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • a general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine.
  • a processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
  • a software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.
  • An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium.
  • the storage medium may be integral to the processor.
  • the processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC.
  • the ASIC may reside in a user terminal.
  • the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
  • the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium.
  • Computer-readable media includes both computer storage media and communication media including any medium that facilitates transfer of a computer program from one place to another.
  • a storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.
  • such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a general-purpose or special-purpose computer, or a general-purpose or special-purpose processor. Also, any connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium.
  • Disk and disc includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.

Abstract

Methods and apparatus for supporting adaptive resource negotiation between evolved node Bs (eNBs) for enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) are provided. This resource negotiation may occur via a network backhaul between the eNBs or, in some cases, using over-the-air messages (OAMs). For certain aspects, a first eNB may propose its adaptive resource partitioning information (ARPI) to a second eNB, where the second eNB may accept or reject the proposed resource partitioning. If the second eNB accepts the proposed partitioning, the second eNB may schedule resources, such as subframes, based on the accepted partitioning.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/323,811, entitled “Adaptive Resource Negotiation between Base Stations for Enhanced Interference Coordination” and filed Apr. 13, 2010, which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • I. Field
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communications, and more specifically to adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC).
  • II. Background
  • Wireless communication networks are widely deployed to provide various communication services such as voice, video, packet data, messaging, broadcast, etc. These wireless networks may be multiple-access networks capable of supporting multiple users by sharing the available network resources. Examples of such multiple-access networks include Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) networks, Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) networks, Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) networks, Orthogonal FDMA (OFDMA) networks, and Single-Carrier FDMA (SC-FDMA) networks.
  • A wireless communication network may include a number of base stations that can support communication for a number of user equipments (UEs). A UE may communicate with a base station via the downlink and uplink. The downlink (or forward link) refers to the communication link from the base station to the UE, and the uplink (or reverse link) refers to the communication link from the UE to the base station.
  • A base station may transmit data and control information on the downlink to a UE and/or may receive data and control information on the uplink from the UE. On the downlink, a transmission from the base station may observe interference due to transmissions from neighbor base stations. On the uplink, a transmission from the UE may cause interference to transmissions from other UEs communicating with the neighbor base stations. The interference may degrade performance on both the downlink and uplink.
  • SUMMARY
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a method for wireless communications. The method generally includes sending, from a first base station, a resource status message to a second base station; receiving, at the first base station from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and scheduling resources at the first base station based on the received resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide an apparatus for wireless communications. The apparatus generally includes means for sending a resource status message to a base station; means for receiving, from the base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and means for scheduling resources based on the received resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide an apparatus for wireless communications. The apparatus generally includes processor transmitter, a receiver, and a scheduler. The transmitter is typically configured to send a resource status message to a base station, and the receiver is configured to receive, from the base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message. The scheduler is generally configured to schedule resources based on the received resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a computer-program product for wireless communications. The computer-program product typically includes a computer-readable medium having code for sending, from a first base station, a resource status message to a second base station; for receiving, at the first base station from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and for scheduling resources at the first base station based on the received resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a method for wireless communications. The method generally includes receiving, at a first base station, a resource status message from a second base station; determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station; determining proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters; and sending, from the first base station to the second base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide an apparatus for wireless communications. The apparatus generally includes means for receiving a resource status message from a base station, means for determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the apparatus, means for determining proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station based on the received resource status message and the parameters, and means for sending, to the base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide an apparatus for wireless communications. The apparatus generally includes a receiver, at least one processor, and a transmitter. The receiver is typically configured to receive a resource status message from a base station. The at least one processor is generally configured to determine one or more parameters related to resource usage at the apparatus and to determine proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station based on the received resource status message and the parameters. The transmitter is typically configured to send an indication of the proposed resource partitioning to the second base station.
  • Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide a computer-program product for wireless communications. The computer-program product typically includes a computer-readable medium having code for receiving, at a first base station, a resource status message from a second base station; for determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station; for determining proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters; and for sending, from the first base station to the second base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
  • Various aspects and features of the disclosure are described in further detail below.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a wireless a communications network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a frame structure in a wireless communications network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 2A is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of an uplink allocation of resources in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a Node B in communication with a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communications network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example heterogeneous network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates example resource partitioning in a heterogeneous network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates example cooperative partitioning of subframes in a heterogeneous network in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example call-flow diagram for scheduling resources at a first base station based on proposed resource partitioning from a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example extended boundary area (EBA) between two negotiating cells in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks executed to schedule resources at a first base station based on received proposed resource partitioning between the first and a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks executed to determine and propose resource partitioning between a first and second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The techniques described herein may be used for various wireless communication networks such as CDMA, TDMA, FDMA, OFDMA, SC-FDMA and other networks. The terms “network” and “system” are often used interchangeably. A CDMA network may implement a radio technology such as Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA), cdma2000, etc. UTRA includes Wideband CDMA (WCDMA) and other variants of CDMA. cdma2000 covers IS-2000, IS-95 and IS-856 standards. A TDMA network may implement a radio technology such as Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM). An OFDMA network may implement a radio technology such as Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA), Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB), IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi), IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX), IEEE 802.20, Flash-OFDM®, etc. UTRA and E-UTRA are part of Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS). 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE-Advanced (LTE-A) are new releases of UMTS that use E-UTRA. UTRA, E-UTRA, UMTS, LTE, LTE-A and GSM are described in documents from an organization named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP). cdma2000 and UMB are described in documents from an organization named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2). The techniques described herein may be used for the wireless networks and radio technologies mentioned above as well as other wireless networks and radio technologies. For clarity, certain aspects of the techniques are described below for LTE, and LTE terminology is used in much of the description below.
  • Example Wireless Network
  • FIG. 1 shows a wireless communication network 100, which may be an LTE network. The wireless network 100 may include a number of evolved Node Bs (eNBs) 110 and other network entities. An eNB may be a station that communicates with user equipment devices (UEs) and may also be referred to as a base station, a Node B, an access point, etc. Each eNB 110 may provide communication coverage for a particular geographic area. In 3GPP, the term “cell” can refer to a coverage area of an eNB and/or an eNB subsystem serving this coverage area, depending on the context in which the term is used.
  • An eNB may provide communication coverage for a macro cell, a pico cell, a femto cell, and/or other types of cell. A macro cell may cover a relatively large geographic area (e.g., several kilometers in radius) and may allow unrestricted access by UEs with service subscription. A pico cell may cover a relatively small geographic area and may allow unrestricted access by UEs with service subscription. A femto cell may cover a relatively small geographic area (e.g., a home) and may allow restricted access by UEs having association with the femto cell (e.g., UEs in a Closed Subscriber Group (CSG), UEs for users in the home, etc.). An eNB for a macro cell may be referred to as a macro eNB. An eNB for a pico cell may be referred to as a pico eNB. An eNB for a femto cell may be referred to as a femto eNB or a home eNB. In the example shown in FIG. 1, eNBs 110 a, 110 b, and 110 c may be macro eNBs for macro cells 102 a, 102 b, and 102 c, respectively. eNB 110 x may be a pico eNB for a pico cell 102 x. eNBs 110 y and 110 z may be femto eNBs for femto cells 102 y and 102 z, respectively. An eNB may support one or multiple (e.g., three) cells.
  • The wireless network 100 may also include relay stations. A relay station is a station that receives a transmission of data and/or other information from an upstream station (e.g., an eNB or a UE) and sends a transmission of the data and/or other information to a downstream station (e.g., a UE or an eNB). A relay station may also be a UE that relays transmissions for other UEs. In the example shown in FIG. 1, a relay station 110 r may communicate with eNB 110 a and a UE 120 r in order to facilitate communication between eNB 110 a and UE 120 r. A relay station may also be referred to as a relay eNB, a relay, etc.
  • The wireless network 100 may be a heterogeneous network (HetNet) that includes eNBs of different types, e.g., macro eNBs, pico eNBs, femto eNBs, relays, etc. These different types of eNBs may have different transmit power levels, different coverage areas, and different impact on interference in the wireless network 100. For example, macro eNBs may have a high transmit power level (e.g., 20 watts) whereas pico eNBs, femto eNBs and relays may have a lower transmit power level (e.g., 1 watt).
  • The wireless network 100 may support synchronous or asynchronous operation. For synchronous operation, the eNBs may have similar frame timing, and transmissions from different eNBs may be approximately aligned in time. For asynchronous operation, the eNBs may have different frame timing, and transmissions from different eNBs may not be aligned in time. The techniques described herein may be used for both synchronous and asynchronous operation.
  • A network controller 130 may couple to a set of eNBs and provide coordination and control for these eNBs. The network controller 130 may communicate with the eNBs 110 via a backhaul. The eNBs 110 may also communicate with one another, e.g., directly or indirectly via wireless or wireline backhaul.
  • The UEs 120 may be dispersed throughout the wireless network 100, and each UE may be stationary or mobile. A UE may also be referred to as a terminal, a mobile station, a subscriber unit, a station, etc. A UE may be a cellular phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a wireless modem, a wireless communication device, a handheld device, a laptop computer, a cordless phone, a wireless local loop (WLL) station, a tablet, etc. A UE may be able to communicate with macro eNBs, pico eNBs, femto eNBs, relays, etc. In FIG. 1, a solid line with double arrows indicates desired transmissions between a UE and a serving eNB, which is an eNB designated to serve the UE on the downlink and/or uplink. A dashed line with double arrows indicates interfering transmissions between a UE and an eNB.
  • LTE utilizes orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) on the downlink and single-carrier frequency division multiplexing (SC-FDM) on the uplink. OFDM and SC-FDM partition the system bandwidth into multiple (K) orthogonal subcarriers, which are also commonly referred to as tones, bins, etc. Each subcarrier may be modulated with data. In general, modulation symbols are sent in the frequency domain with OFDM and in the time domain with SC-FDM. The spacing between adjacent subcarriers may be fixed, and the total number of subcarriers (K) may be dependent on the system bandwidth. For example, K may be equal to 128, 256, 512, 1024, or 2048 for system bandwidth of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 megahertz (MHz), respectively. The system bandwidth may also be partitioned into subbands. For example, a subband may cover 1.08 MHz, and there may be 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 subbands for system bandwidth of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 MHz, respectively.
  • FIG. 2 shows a frame structure used in LTE. The transmission timeline for the downlink may be partitioned into units of radio frames. Each radio frame may have a predetermined duration (e.g., 10 milliseconds (ms)) and may be partitioned into 10 subframes with indices of 0 through 9. Each subframe may include two slots. Each radio frame may thus include 20 slots with indices of 0 through 19. Each slot may include L symbol periods, e.g., L=7 symbol periods for a normal cyclic prefix (as shown in FIG. 2) or L=6 symbol periods for an extended cyclic prefix. The 2L symbol periods in each subframe may be assigned indices of 0 through 2L−1. The available time frequency resources may be partitioned into resource blocks. Each resource block may cover N subcarriers (e.g., 12 subcarriers) in one slot.
  • In LTE, an eNB may send a primary synchronization signal (PSS) and a secondary synchronization signal (SSS) for each cell in the eNB. The primary and secondary synchronization signals may be sent in symbol periods 6 and 5, respectively, in each of subframes 0 and 5 of each radio frame with the normal cyclic prefix, as shown in FIG. 2. The synchronization signals may be used by UEs for cell detection and acquisition. The eNB may send a Physical Broadcast Channel (PBCH) in symbol periods 0 to 3 in slot 1 of subframe 0. The PBCH may carry certain system information.
  • The eNB may send a Physical Control Format Indicator Channel (PCFICH) in the first symbol period of each subframe, as shown in FIG. 2. The PCFICH may convey the number of symbol periods (M) used for control channels, where M may be equal to 1, 2, or 3 and may change from subframe to subframe. M may also be equal to 4 for a small system bandwidth, e.g., with less than 10 resource blocks. The eNB may send a Physical HARQ Indicator Channel (PHICH) and a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) in the first M symbol periods of each subframe (not shown in FIG. 2). The PHICH may carry information to support hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ). The PDCCH may carry information on resource allocation for UEs and control information for downlink channels. The eNB may send a Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) in the remaining symbol periods of each subframe. The PDSCH may carry data for UEs scheduled for data transmission on the downlink. The various signals and channels in LTE are described in 3GPP TS 36.211, entitled “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation,” which is publicly available.
  • The eNB may send the PSS, SSS, and PBCH in the center 1.08 MHz of the system bandwidth used by the eNB. The eNB may send the PCFICH and PHICH across the entire system bandwidth in each symbol period in which these channels are sent. The eNB may send the PDCCH to groups of UEs in certain portions of the system bandwidth. The eNB may send the PDSCH to specific UEs in specific portions of the system bandwidth. The eNB may send the PSS, SSS, PBCH, PCFICH, and PHICH in a broadcast manner to all UEs, may send the PDCCH in a unicast manner to specific UEs, and may also send the PDSCH in a unicast manner to specific UEs.
  • A number of resource elements may be available in each symbol period. Each resource element may cover one subcarrier in one symbol period and may be used to send one modulation symbol, which may be a real or complex value. Resource elements not used for a reference signal in each symbol period may be arranged into resource element groups (REGs). Each REG may include four resource elements in one symbol period. The PCFICH may occupy four REGs, which may be spaced approximately equally across frequency, in symbol period 0. The PHICH may occupy three REGs, which may be spread across frequency, in one or more configurable symbol periods. For example, the three REGs for the PHICH may all belong in symbol period 0 or may be spread in symbol periods 0, 1, and 2. The PDCCH may occupy 9, 18, 32, or 64 REGs, which may be selected from the available REGs, in the first M symbol periods. Only certain combinations of REGs may be allowed for the PDCCH.
  • A UE may know the specific REGs used for the PHICH and the PCFICH. The UE may search different combinations of REGs for the PDCCH. The number of combinations to search is typically less than the number of allowed combinations for the PDCCH. An eNB may send the PDCCH to the UE in any of the combinations that the UE will search.
  • FIG. 2A shows an exemplary format 200A for the uplink in LTE. The available resource blocks for the uplink may be partitioned into a data section and a control section. The control section may be formed at the two edges of the system bandwidth and may have a configurable size. The resource blocks in the control section may be assigned to UEs for transmission of control information. The data section may include all resource blocks not included in the control section. The design in FIG. 2A results in the data section including contiguous subcarriers, which may allow a single UE to be assigned all of the contiguous subcarriers in the data section.
  • A UE may be assigned resource blocks in the control section to transmit control information to an eNB. The UE may also be assigned resource blocks in the data section to transmit data to the eNB. The UE may transmit control information in a Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) 210 on the assigned resource blocks in the control section. The UE may transmit only data or both data and control information in a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) 220 on the assigned resource blocks in the data section. An uplink transmission may span both slots of a subframe and may hop across frequency as shown in FIG. 2A.
  • A UE may be within the coverage of multiple eNBs. One of these eNBs may be selected to serve the UE. The serving eNB may be selected based on various criteria such as received power, pathloss, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), etc.
  • A UE may operate in a dominant interference scenario in which the UE may observe high interference from one or more interfering eNBs. A dominant interference scenario may occur due to restricted association. For example, in FIG. 1, UE 120 y may be close to femto eNB 110 y and may have high received power for eNB 110 y. However, UE 120 y may not be able to access femto eNB 110 y due to restricted association and may then connect to macro eNB 110 c with lower received power (as shown in FIG. 1) or to femto eNB 110 z also with lower received power (not shown in FIG. 1). UE 120 y may then observe high interference from femto eNB 110 y on the downlink and may also cause high interference to eNB 110 y on the uplink.
  • A dominant interference scenario may also occur due to range extension, which is a scenario in which a UE connects to an eNB with lower pathloss and lower SNR among all eNBs detected by the UE. For example, in FIG. 1, UE 120 x may detect macro eNB 110 b and pico eNB 110 x and may have lower received power for eNB 110 x than eNB 110 b. Nevertheless, it may be desirable for UE 120 x to connect to pico eNB 110 x if the pathloss for eNB 110 x is lower than the pathloss for macro eNB 110 b. This may result in less interference to the wireless network for a given data rate for UE 120 x.
  • In an aspect, communication in a dominant interference scenario may be supported by having different eNBs operate on different frequency bands. A frequency band is a range of frequencies that may be used for communication and may be given by (i) a center frequency and a bandwidth or (ii) a lower frequency and an upper frequency. A frequency band may also be referred to as a band, a frequency channel, etc. The frequency bands for different eNBs may be selected such that a UE can communicate with a weaker eNB in a dominant interference scenario while allowing a strong eNB to communicate with its UEs. An eNB may be classified as a “weak” eNB or a “strong” eNB based on the received power of signals from the eNB received at a UE (and not based on the transmit power level of the eNB).
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a design of a base station or an eNB 110 and a UE 120, which may be one of the base stations/eNBs and one of the UEs in FIG. 1. For a restricted association scenario, the eNB 110 may be macro eNB 110 c in FIG. 1, and the UE 120 may be UE 120 y. The eNB 110 may also be a base station of some other type. The eNB 110 may be equipped with T antennas 334 a through 334 t, and the UE 120 may be equipped with R antennas 352 a through 352 r, where in general T≧1 and R≧1.
  • At the eNB 110, a transmit processor 320 may receive data from a data source 312 and control information from a controller/processor 340. The control information may be for the PBCH, PCFICH, PHICH, PDCCH, etc. The data may be for the PDSCH, etc. The transmit processor 320 may process (e.g., encode and symbol map) the data and control information to obtain data symbols and control symbols, respectively. The transmit processor 320 may also generate reference symbols, e.g., for the PSS, SSS, and cell-specific reference signal. A transmit (TX) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) processor 330 may perform spatial processing (e.g., precoding) on the data symbols, the control symbols, and/or the reference symbols, if applicable, and may provide T output symbol streams to T modulators (MODs) 332 a through 332 t. Each modulator 332 may process a respective output symbol stream (e.g., for OFDM, etc.) to obtain an output sample stream. Each modulator 332 may further process (e.g., convert to analog, amplify, filter, and upconvert) the output sample stream to obtain a downlink signal. T downlink signals from modulators 332 a through 332 t may be transmitted via T antennas 334 a through 334 t, respectively.
  • At the UE 120, antennas 352 a through 352 r may receive the downlink signals from the eNB 110 and may provide received signals to demodulators (DEMODs) 354 a through 354 r, respectively. Each demodulator 354 may condition (e.g., filter, amplify, downconvert, and digitize) a respective received signal to obtain input samples. Each demodulator 354 may further process the input samples (e.g., for OFDM, etc.) to obtain received symbols. A MIMO detector 356 may obtain received symbols from all R demodulators 354 a through 354 r, perform MIMO detection on the received symbols, if applicable, and provide detected symbols. A receive processor 358 may process (e.g., demodulate, deinterleave, and decode) the detected symbols, provide decoded data for the UE 120 to a data sink 360, and provide decoded control information to a controller/processor 380.
  • On the uplink, at the UE 120, a transmit processor 364 may receive and process data (e.g., for the PUSCH) from a data source 362 and control information (e.g., for the PUCCH) from the controller/processor 380. The transmit processor 364 may also generate reference symbols for a reference signal. The symbols from the transmit processor 364 may be precoded by a TX MIMO processor 366 if applicable, further processed by modulators 354 a through 354 r (e.g., for SC-FDM, etc.), and transmitted to the eNB 110. At the eNB 110, the uplink signals from the UE 120 may be received by the antennas 334, processed by demodulators 332, detected by a MIMO detector 336 if applicable, and further processed by a receive processor 338 to obtain decoded data and control information sent by the UE 120. The receive processor 338 may provide the decoded data to a data sink 339 and the decoded control information to the controller/processor 340.
  • The controllers/ processors 340 and 380 may direct the operation at the eNB 110 and the UE 120, respectively. The controller/processor 340 and/or other processors and modules at the eNB 110 may perform or direct operations for blocks 900 in FIG. 9, operations for blocks 1000 in FIG. 10, and/or other processes for the techniques described herein. The memories 342, 382 may store data and program codes for the eNB 110 and the UE 120, respectively. A scheduler 344 may schedule UEs for data transmission on the downlink and/or uplink.
  • Example Resource Partitioning
  • According to certain aspects of the present disclosure, when a network supports enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC), the base stations may negotiate with each other to coordinate resources in order to reduce/eliminate interference by the interfering cell giving up part of its resources. In accordance with this interference coordination, a UE may be able to access a serving cell even with severe interference by using the resources yielded by the interfering cell.
  • For example, a femto cell with a closed access mode (i.e., only a member femto UE can access the cell) in the coverage area of an open macro may be able to create a “coverage hole” for the macro cell. By negotiating for the femto cell to yield some of its resources, effectively removing interference, the macro UE under the femto cell coverage area may still be able to access the UE's serving macro cell using these yielded resources.
  • In a radio access system using OFDM, such as Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN), the yielded resources may be time based, frequency based, or a combination of both. When the coordinated resource partitioning is time based, the interfering cell may simply not use some of the subframes in the time domain. When the yielded resources (i.e., the coordinated resource partitioning) are frequency based, the interfering cell may yield subcarriers in the frequency domain. When the coordinated resource partitioning is a combination of both frequency and time, the interfering cell may yield certain frequency and time resources.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example scenario where eICIC may allow a macro UE 120 y supporting eICIC (e.g., a Rel-10 macro UE as shown in FIG. 4) to access the macro cell 110 c even when the macro UE 120 y is experiencing severe interference from the femto cell 110 y, as illustrated by the solid radio link 402. A legacy macro UE 120 u (e.g., a Rel-8 macro UE as shown in FIG. 4) may not be able to access the macro cell 110 c under severe interference from the femto cell 110 y, as illustrated by the broken radio link 404. A femto UE 120 v (e.g., a Rel-8 femto UE as shown in FIG. 4) may access the femto cell 110 y without any interference problems from the macro cell 110 c.
  • According to certain aspects, networks may support eICIC, where there may be different sets of partitioning information. A first of these sets may be referred to as Semi-Static Resource Partitioning Information (SRPI). A second of these sets may be referred to as Adaptive Resource Partitioning Information (ARPI). As the name implies, SRPI typically does not change frequently, and SRPI may be sent to a UE so that the UE can use the resource partitioning information for the UE's own operations.
  • As an example, the resource partitioning may be implemented with 8 ms periodicity (8 subframes) or 40 ms periodicity (40 subframes). According to certain aspects, it may be assumed that frequency division duplexing (FDD) may also be applied such that frequency resources may also be partitioned. For communications via the downlink (e.g., from a cell node B to a UE), a partitioning pattern may be mapped to a known subframe (e.g., a first subframe of each radio frame that has a system frame number (SFN) value that is a multiple of an integer N, such as 4). Such a mapping may be applied in order to determine resource partitioning information (RPI) for a specific subframe. As an example, a subframe that is subject to coordinated resource partitioning (e.g., yielded by an interfering cell) for the downlink may be identified by an index:

  • IndexSRPI DL=(SFN*10+subframe number) mod 8
  • For the uplink, the SRPI mapping may be shifted, for example, by 4 ms. Thus, an example for the uplink may be:

  • IndexSRPI UL=(SFN*10+subframe number+4) mod 8
  • SRPI may use the following three values for each entry:
      • U (Use): this value indicates the subframe has been cleaned up from the dominant interference to be used by this cell (i.e., the main interfering cells do not use this subframe);
      • N (No Use): this value indicates the subframe shall not be used; and
      • X (Unknown): this value indicates the subframe is not statically partitioned. Details of resource usage negotiation between base stations are not known to the UE.
  • Another possible set of parameters for SRPI may be the following:
      • U (Use): this value indicates the subframe has been cleaned up from the dominant interference to be used by this cell (i.e. the main interfering cells do not use this subframe);
      • N (No Use): this value indicates the subframe shall not be used;
      • X (Unknown): this value indicates the subframe is not statically partitioned (and details of resource usage negotiation between base stations are not known to the UE); and
      • C (Common): this value may indicate all cells may use this subframe without resource partitioning. This subframe may be subject to interference, so that the base station may choose to use this subframe only for a UE that is not experiencing severe interference.
  • The serving cell's SRPI may be broadcasted over the air. In E-UTRAN, the SRPI of the serving cell may be sent in a master information block (MIB), or one of the system information blocks (SIBs). A predefined SRPI may be defined based on the characteristics of cells, e.g. macro cell, pico cell (with open access), and femto cell (with closed access). In such a case, encoding of SRPI in the system overhead message may result in more efficient broadcasting over the air.
  • The base station may also broadcast the neighbor cell's SRPI in one of the SIBs. For this, SRPI may be sent with its corresponding range of physical cell identities (PCIs).
  • ARPI may represent further resource partitioning information with the detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes in SRPI. As noted above, detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes is typically known only to the base stations, and a UE does not know it.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate examples of SRPI assignment in the scenario with macro and femto cells.
  • Example Adaptive Resource Negotiation
  • As described above, a key mechanism for heterogeneous networks (HetNets) may be partitioning of resources. As an example, a cell may be silent on a particular subframe, allowing users from a neighbor cell that are under its coverage to be served. From the point of view of users experiencing significant interference, time-division multiplexing (TDM) partitioning between cells may broadly create two classes of subframes: clean (protected) and unclean (unprotected) subframes.
  • In homogeneous networks, eNBs in close proximity to each other may likely be from the same vendor. Thus, proprietary signaling and collaboration among neighbors may be possible and, perhaps, preferred.
  • In HetNet deployment, it may be quite likely that eNBs of different power classes are from different vendors and rely on a standardized interference. Signaling may rely on minimum performance testing or interoperability testing (TOT) to ensure robust performance. Certain network implementations may take bolder steps to ensure cross-vendor interference cancellation and resource coordination. According to certain aspects of the present disclosure, adaptive resource partitioning may not be limited to current measurement and signaling techniques.
  • Load balancing in homogeneous networks may imply changing the bias of each cell to match the load. As a result, more even distribution of offered load may be achieved. However, a lower UE SNR may be used since the strongest cell may not be used.
  • In HetNets, a similar concept may be used with enhancement. As a result, a more even distribution of offered load may be achievable, and a UE's SNR may be controlled via resource partitioning. According to certain aspects, HetNet designs may include tight coupling of load balancing (handover) and resource partitioning. Decoupling load balancing and resource partitioning may be challenging, but desirable.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a peer-to-peer negotiation algorithm between eNB 1 110 1 and eNB 2 110 2, according to certain aspects of the present disclosure. Initially, at 702, eNB 1 110 1 may determine one or more resource-related parameters associated with eNB1 and, at 704, eNB 2 110 2 may determine one or more resource-related parameters associated with eNB2. Based on the determined one or more resource-related parameters, eNB 1 110 1 may send a resource status report (RSR) to eNB2 at 706. For certain aspects, communication between eNB1 and eNB2, such as the RSR, may be sent via an X2 backhaul coupling the two eNBs. After receiving the RSR from eNB1, eNB2 may determine a proposed resource partitioning at 708 and may transmit a resource partitioning update request message at 710 to eNB1, indicating this proposed partitioning. eNB1 may reject the proposed partitioning indicated by the received resource partitioning update message for various reasons and, in response, may transmit a resource partitioning update reject message at 712 to eNB2, in an effort to indicate this rejection to eNB2.
  • Upon receiving the resource partitioning update reject message from eNB1, eNB2 may determine another proposed resource partitioning at 714 and may transmit another resource partitioning update request message at 716 to eNB1. eNB1 may accept the proposed resource partitioning indicated by the received request message and may send a resource partitioning update accept message at 718 to eNB2, indicating this acceptance to eNB2. Based on the proposed resource partitioning received from eNB2, eNB1 may schedule resources accordingly at 720.
  • This process of determining a proposed resource partitioning and sending an indication of the proposed resource partitioning in an update request message may be repeated until eNB1 accepts the proposed resource partitioning and eNB2 receives an update accept message indicating this acceptance by eNB1. For certain aspects, the originally proposed resource partitioning determined at 708 may be accepted by eNB1 after receipt of the update request message at 710. In this case, the flow in FIG. 7 may jump down to eNB1 sending a resource partitioning update accept message at 718 to eNB2, indicating this acceptance to eNB2. Based on the originally proposed resource partitioning received from eNB2, eNB1 may schedule resources accordingly at 720.
  • For certain aspects, received resource partitioning update request messages at 710 or 716 may indicate one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs, also termed ABSFs) of eNB 2 110 2. For certain aspects, the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning may comprise a load information message indicating the ABSs. For certain aspects, the load information message may comprise one or more information elements (IEs) indicating the ABSs.
  • According to certain aspects, each pair of nodes may negotiate a partitioning rule between them. This does not preclude master-slave type of negotiation (e.g., a macro base station may have the final say when negotiating with a femto base station). As a result, each cell may have a set of ARPIs.
  • According to certain aspects of the present disclosure, X2-based communication may be used as negotiation links between two cells. A link may be established based on UE radio resource management (RRM) reports, for example using automatic neighbor relation (ANR) method (e.g., RSRP (neighbor cell)−RSRP (serving cell)≧threshold, where RSRP is a reference signal receive power). A set of negotiation links may constitute a “jamming graph.”
  • According to certain aspects of the present disclosure, an extended boundary area (EBA) may be defined as an area between two negotiating cells under which a UE would prefer protected resources to be scheduled.
  • According to certain aspects, adaptive partitioning may be adaptable to bursty traffic. This may be different depending on the appropriate priority of guaranteed bit rate (GBR) versus non-GBR traffic. As an example, GBR may have absolute priority in the negotiation. According to certain aspects, a physical resource block (PRB) usage metric may be used to capture the burstiness of traffic and load of a cell. If full load is reached by both cells, fairness criteria may be used as a tie-breaker to update the algorithm.
  • When the network supports eICIC, two different sets of partitioning information, namely SRPI and ARPI, may exist. SRPI does not change frequently and may use the following three values for each entry as described above: U, N, or X.
  • ARPI represents further resource partitioning information with the detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes in SRPI. The detailed information for the ‘X’ subframes is only known to the eNBs, and a UE does not know it. According to certain aspects, eNBs may use X2 messages or over-the-air messages (OAMs) to negotiate ARPI configuration. ARPI may use the following values for each entry:
      • AU (Adaptive Use): same as U from eNB scheduling point of view, but not known to the UE;
      • AN (Adaptive No Use): same as N from eNB scheduling point of view, but not known to the UE; and
      • AC (Adaptive Common): all cells may use this subframe without TDM partitioning, but not known to the UE.
  • The initial X subframes of SRPI may be set to ‘AC’ in ARPI.
  • There may be four X2 procedures to support adaptive resource negotiation in HetNet. These may include:
      • 1. Initial association between eNBs for eICIC, where, for certain aspects, using an X2 setup procedure for the association may comprise receiving, at a first base station, at least one of a class or an access mode of a second base station;
      • 2. Background resource status procedure, where there may be a periodic exchange of resource status between eNBs and reuse of the existing messages with additional information elements (IEs);
      • 3. Adaptive resource negotiation procedure which may include a resource partitioning update request message (which may contain suggested ARPI between two cells), a resource partitioning update accept message, and a resource partitioning update reject message; and
      • 4. Range expansion request procedure (for pico scenario). This procedure starts to use range expansion and may involve adjusting cell specific offset for handover (HO). This procedure may be combined either with the adaptive resource negotiation procedure or a mobility setting change procedure (range expansion request procedure was defined in Rel-9 in the context of self organizing networks (SONs)).
  • To initially associate the eNBs, an X2 setup procedure and an eNB configuration update procedure may be used. This can be triggered by a UE's measurement report and as part of an ANR procedure. During this initial association, eNB class and access mode may be exchanged, including whether the eNB is a macro eNB, a femto eNB (closed access home eNB (HeNB)), or a pico eNB (open access HeNB).
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example EBA between two negotiating cells, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure. EBA(i,j) 806 may be defined as the EBA of cell i 804 due to interfering cell j 802. A UE 120 in EBA(i,j) 806 may be served only through the UE's interference cancellation and the eNB's interference coordination by resource partitioning between the serving eNB 110 of cell i 804 and interfering eNB 110 of cell j 802. The center(i) 808 may be considered as the rest of the coverage area of cell i 804 except for the sum of EBA(i,j) 806. The EBA of a macro cell in femto-macro scenario may be defined as the femto cell coverage under the macro cell coverage.
  • For certain aspects, the ARPI(i,j), where j=1 . . . n, may be considered the ARPI of cell i negotiated with cell j. For certain aspects, the ARPI (i,center) may be considered the ARPI of cell i for UEs not in the EBA. For certain aspects, N_EBA(i,j), where j=1 . . . n, is the number of served active UEs from cell i within EBA (i,j). N_EBA(i)=sum_j (N_EBA(i,j)), where j=1 . . . n, may be considered as the total number of UEs of cell i on all EBAs. N(i) may be considered the total number of UEs of cell i.
  • There may be several input parameters for the ARPI algorithm. For example, the upper layer may provide the scheduler, such as the scheduler 344 of FIG. 3, with certain information. This information may include, for each UE, the EBA that the UE belongs to. The upper layer may track the UE's EBA by proper setting of an A3 event and the corresponding measurement report. In LTE, an event triggers a report, and an A3 event indicates when a neighbor cell becomes better than an offset relative to the serving cell. The information may also include ARPI(i,j) where j=1 . . . n, center. The U/AU subframes of ARPI(i,j), j=1 . . . n may determine the available resources for the UE in EBA(i,j), while the U/AU/AC subframes of ARPI(i,center) may determine the available resources for the UE in center(i). The upper layer may also provide the scheduler with filtering time windows for measurement and frequency of reporting. The scheduler may use the above information while scheduling resources for the UEs.
  • The media access control (MAC) layer may measure values for the group of UEs that belong to the same area (i.e., for all EBA(i,j), where j=1 . . . n, noEBA). The details of such parameters are defined in TS 36.314. The values may include:
      • DL/UL total PRB usage (% over available resources): PRB_total(i,j);
      • DL/UL GBR PRB usage (% over available resources): PRB_GBR(i,j);
      • DL/UL non-GBR PRB usage (% over available resources): PRB_non-GBR(i,j);
      • average number of UEs that have Dedicated Traffic Channel (DTCH) data queued on the DL/UL: N_EBA(i,j);
      • Average DL/UL cell data rate for GBR bearers: Bitrate_GBR(i,j); and
      • Average DL/UL cell data rate for non-GBR bearers: Bitrate_nonGBR(i,j).
  • Regarding eNB behavior for ARPI negotiation, neighbor eNBs may exchange the parameters defined above. On the input side, the eNBs may exchange serving cell (cell i) parameters from the MAC layer and neighboring cell parameters from cell j via backhaul messages. On the output side, the eNBs may exchange new ARPI(i,j) based on internal algorithms to maximize, or at least increase, system performance and fairness. If a new ARPI(i,j) is different from the current ARPI(i,j), the eNB of cell i may start negotiation with an eNB of cell j by sending a resource partitioning update request message.
  • FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks 900 executed to schedule resources at a first base station based on received resource partitioning from a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure. The blocks 900 may be performed, for example, by an eNB 110 as the first base station, and the second base station may also be an eNB 110, which may be of a different class and/or have a different access mode than the first base station in a HetNet. For example, the second base station may be a macro base station, whereas the first base station may be a femto or a pico base station.
  • At block 902, a first base station may send a resource status message to a second base station. At block 904, the first base station may receive, from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning may be based on the resource status message. At block 906, the first base station may schedule resources based on the received resource partitioning.
  • For certain aspects, the first base station may send to the second base station a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the first base station. For certain aspects, the first base station may receive, from the second base station before receiving the message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, another message indicating another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, may reject the other proposed resource partitioning, and may send, to the second base station, a notification of the rejected proposed resource partitioning. For certain aspects, the first base station may determine one or more parameters related to resource status associated with the first base station, wherein the resource status message indicates the parameters.
  • FIG. 10 is a functional block diagram conceptually illustrating example blocks 1000 executed to determine a proposed resource partitioning between a first and a second base station, in accordance with certain aspects of the present disclosure. The blocks 1000 may be performed, for example, by an eNB 110 as the first base station, and the second base station may also be an eNB 110, which may be of a different class and/or have a different access mode than the first base station in a HetNet. For example, the first base station may be a macro base station, whereas the second base station may be a pico or a femto base station.
  • At block 1002, a first base station may receive a resource status message from a second base station. At block 1004, the first base station may determine one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station. At block 1006, the first base station may determine proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters. At block 1008, the first base station may send the proposed resource partitioning to the second base station.
  • For certain aspects, the first base station may receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the second base station. For certain aspects, the first base station may receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was rejected by the second base station, may determine another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, and may send, to the second base station, another message indicating the other proposed resource partitioning.
  • For certain aspects, the first base station may determine a current resource partitioning between the first and second base stations before receiving a resource status message from a second base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is sent only if the proposed resource partitioning is different than the current resource partitioning. For certain aspects, the first base station may schedule resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the first base station for UEs in an area covered only by the first base station.
  • The various operations of methods described above may be performed by any suitable means capable of performing the corresponding functions. The means may include various hardware and/or software component(s) and/or module(s), including, but not limited to a circuit, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or processor. For example, means for transmitting or means for sending may comprise an interface coupled between a network backhaul and the controller/processor 340 of the eNB 110 of FIG. 3 or a transmitter, a modulator 332, and/or an antenna 334 of the eNB 110 shown in FIG. 3. Means for receiving may comprise an interface coupled between a network backhaul and the controller/processor 340 of the eNB 110 of FIG. 3 or a receiver, a demodulator 332, and/or an antenna 334 of the eNB 110 shown in FIG. 3. Means for processing, means for determining, means for using, means for scheduling, and/or means for rejecting may comprise a processing system, which may include at least one processor, such as the transmit processor 320, the receive processor 338, and/or the controller/processor 340 of the eNB 110 illustrated in FIG. 3. Means for scheduling may also comprise a scheduler 344 of the eNB 110 depicted in FIG. 3.
  • Those of skill in the art would understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.
  • Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the disclosure herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present disclosure.
  • The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the disclosure herein may be implemented or performed with a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
  • The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the disclosure herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
  • In one or more exemplary designs, the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium. Computer-readable media includes both computer storage media and communication media including any medium that facilitates transfer of a computer program from one place to another. A storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a general-purpose or special-purpose computer, or a general-purpose or special-purpose processor. Also, any connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. For example, if the software is transmitted from a website, server, or other remote source using a coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, digital subscriber line (DSL), or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave, then the coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, DSL, or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave are included in the definition of medium. Disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
  • The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims (112)

1. A method for wireless communications, comprising:
sending, from a first base station, a resource status message to a second base station;
receiving, at the first base station from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and
scheduling resources at the first base station based on the received resource partitioning.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising sending, from the first base station to the second base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the first base station.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
receiving, from the second base station before receiving the message, another message indicating another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations;
rejecting the other proposed resource partitioning; and
sending, from the first base station to the second base station, a notification of the rejected other proposed resource partitioning.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an X2 backhaul.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an over-the-air message (OAM).
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising using an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the first and second base stations.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the using comprises sending at least one of a class or an access mode of the first base station to the second base station.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining one or more parameters related to resource status associated with the first base station, wherein the resource status message indicates the parameters.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the scheduling comprises:
scheduling the resources based on the received resource partitioning for first user equipments (UEs) in a first area covered by the second base station; and
scheduling the resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the first base station for second UEs in a second area covered only by the first base station.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the received proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the second base station.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the first base station is a pico base station or a femto base station and wherein the second base station is a macro base station.
15. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:
means for sending a resource status message to a base station;
means for receiving, from the base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and
means for scheduling resources based on the received resource partitioning.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the means for sending is configured to send, to the base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the apparatus.
17. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising:
means for receiving, from the base station before receiving the message, another message indicating another proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station; and
means for rejecting the other proposed resource partitioning, wherein the means for sending is configured to send, to the base station, a notification of the rejected other proposed resource partitioning.
18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an X2 backhaul.
19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an over-the-air message (OAM).
20. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising means for using an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the apparatus and the base station.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the means for using the X2 setup procedure is configured to send at least one of a class or an access mode of the apparatus to the base station.
22. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising means for determining one or more parameters related to resource status associated with the apparatus, wherein the resource status message indicates the parameters.
23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
24. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the means for scheduling is configured to:
schedule the resources based on the received resource partitioning for first user equipments (UEs) in a first area covered by the base station; and
schedule the resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the apparatus for second UEs in a second area covered only by the apparatus.
25. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the received proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the base station.
26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
27. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
28. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the apparatus is a pico base station or a femto base station and wherein the base station is a macro base station.
29. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:
a transmitter configured to send a resource status message to a base station;
a receiver configured to receive, from the base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and
a scheduler configured to schedule resources based on the received resource partitioning.
30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the transmitter is configured to send, to the base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the apparatus.
31. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising at least one processor, wherein the receiver is configured to receive, from the base station before receiving the message, another message indicating another proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, wherein the at least one processor is configured to reject the other proposed resource partitioning, and wherein the transmitter is configured to send, to the base station, a notification of the rejected other proposed resource partitioning.
32. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an X2 backhaul.
33. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an over-the-air message (OAM).
34. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising at least one processor configured to use an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the apparatus and the base station.
35. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the at least one processor is configured to use the X2 setup procedure by sending at least one of a class or an access mode of the apparatus to the base station.
36. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising at least one processor configured to determine one or more parameters related to resource status associated with the apparatus, wherein the resource status message indicates the parameters.
37. The apparatus of claim 36, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
38. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the scheduler is configured to:
schedule the resources based on the received resource partitioning for first user equipments (UEs) in a first area covered by the base station; and
schedule the resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the apparatus for second UEs in a second area covered only by the apparatus.
39. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the received proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the base station.
40. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
41. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
42. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the apparatus is a pico base station or a femto base station and wherein the base station is a macro base station.
43. A computer-program product for wireless communications, the computer-program product comprising:
a computer-readable medium having code for:
sending, from a first base station, a resource status message to a second base station;
receiving, at the first base station from the second base station, a message indicating proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations, wherein the proposed resource partitioning is based on the resource status message; and
scheduling resources at the first base station based on the received resource partitioning.
44. The computer-program product of claim 43, further comprising code for sending, from the first base station to the second base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the first base station.
45. The computer-program product of claim 43, further comprising code for:
receiving, from the second base station before receiving the message, another message indicating another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations;
rejecting the other proposed resource partitioning; and
sending, from the first base station to the second base station, a notification of the rejected other proposed resource partitioning.
46. The computer-program product of claim 43, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an X2 backhaul.
47. The computer-program product of claim 43, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning is received via an over-the-air message (OAM).
48. The computer-program product of claim 43, further comprising code for using an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the first and second base stations.
49. The computer-program product of claim 48, wherein the using comprises sending at least one of a class or an access mode of the first base station to the second base station.
50. The computer-program product of claim 43, further comprising code for determining one or more parameters related to resource status associated with the first base station, wherein the resource status message indicates the parameters.
51. The computer-program product of claim 50, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
52. The computer-program product of claim 43, wherein the scheduling comprises:
scheduling the resources based on the received resource partitioning for first user equipments (UEs) in a first area covered by the second base station; and
scheduling the resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the first base station for second UEs in a second area covered only by the first base station.
53. The computer-program product of claim 43, wherein the received proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the second base station.
54. The computer-program product of claim 53, wherein the message indicating the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
55. The computer-program product of claim 54, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
56. The computer-program product of claim 43, wherein the first base station is a pico base station or a femto base station and wherein the second base station is a macro base station.
57. A method for wireless communications, comprising:
receiving, at a first base station, a resource status message from a second base station;
determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station;
determining proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters;
sending, from the first base station to the second base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
58. The method of claim 57, further comprising receiving, at the first base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the second base station.
59. The method of claim 57, further comprising:
receiving, at the first base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was rejected by the second base station;
determining another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations; and
sending, from the first base station to the second base station, another indication of the other proposed resource partitioning.
60. The method of claim 57, further comprising determining a current resource partitioning between the first and second base stations before the receiving, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent only if the proposed resource partitioning is different than the current resource partitioning.
61. The method of claim 57, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an X2 backhaul.
62. The method of claim 57, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an over-the-air message (OAM).
63. The method of claim 57, further comprising using an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the first and second base stations.
64. The method of claim 63, wherein the using comprises receiving, at the first base station, at least one of a class or an access mode of the second base station.
65. The method of claim 57, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
66. The method of claim 57, further comprising scheduling resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the first base station for user equipments (UEs) in an area covered only by the first base station.
67. The method of claim 57, wherein the proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the first base station.
68. The method of claim 67, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
69. The method of claim 68, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
70. The method of claim 57, wherein the first base station is a macro base station and wherein the second base station is a pico base station or a femto base station.
71. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:
means for receiving a resource status message from a base station;
means for determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the apparatus;
means for determining proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station based on the received resource status message and the parameters;
means for sending, to the base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
72. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the means for receiving is configured to receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the base station.
73. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the means for receiving is configured to receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was rejected by the base station, wherein the means for determining the proposed resource partitioning is configured to determine another proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, and wherein the means for sending is configured to send, to the base station, another indication of the other proposed resource partitioning.
74. The apparatus of claim 71, further comprising means for determining a current resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station before receiving the resource status message, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent only if the proposed resource partitioning is different than the current resource partitioning.
75. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an X2 backhaul.
76. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an over-the-air message (OAM).
77. The apparatus of claim 71, further comprising means for using an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the apparatus and the base station.
78. The apparatus of claim 77, wherein the means for using is configured to receive at least one of a class or an access mode of the base station.
79. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
80. The apparatus of claim 71, further comprising means for scheduling resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the apparatus for user equipments (UEs) in an area covered only by the apparatus.
81. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the apparatus.
82. The apparatus of claim 81, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
83. The apparatus of claim 82, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
84. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the apparatus is a macro base station and wherein the base station is a pico base station or a femto base station.
85. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:
a receiver configured to receive a resource status message from a base station;
at least one processor configured to:
determine one or more parameters related to resource usage at the apparatus; and
determine proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station based on the received resource status message and the parameters; and
a transmitter configured to send an indication of the proposed resource partitioning to the base station.
86. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the receiver is configured to receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the base station.
87. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the receiver is configured to receive a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was rejected by the base station, wherein the at least one processor is configured to determine another proposed resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station, and wherein the transmitter is configured to send, to the base station, another indication of the other proposed resource partitioning.
88. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the at least one processor is configured to determine a current resource partitioning between the apparatus and the base station before receiving the resource status message and wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent only if the proposed resource partitioning is different than the current resource partitioning.
89. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an X2 backhaul.
90. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an over-the-air message (OAM).
91. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the at least one processor is configured to use an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the apparatus and the base station.
92. The apparatus of claim 91, wherein the at least one processor is configured to use the X2 setup procedure by receiving at least one of a class or an access mode of the base station.
93. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
94. The apparatus of claim 85, further comprising a scheduler configured to schedule resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the apparatus for user equipments (UEs) in an area covered only by the apparatus.
95. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the apparatus.
96. The apparatus of claim 95, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
97. The apparatus of claim 96, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
98. The apparatus of claim 85, wherein the apparatus is a macro base station and wherein the base station is a pico base station or a femto base station.
99. A computer-program product for wireless communications, the computer-program product comprising:
a computer-readable medium having code for:
receiving, at a first base station, a resource status message from a second base station;
determining one or more parameters related to resource usage at the first base station;
determining proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations based on the received resource status message and the parameters;
sending, from the first base station to the second base station, an indication of the proposed resource partitioning.
100. The computer-program product of claim 99, further comprising code for receiving, at the first base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was accepted by the second base station.
101. The computer-program product of claim 99, further comprising code for:
receiving, at the first base station, a notification that the proposed resource partitioning was rejected by the second base station;
determining another proposed resource partitioning between the first and second base stations; and
sending, from the first base station to the second base station, another indication of the other proposed resource partitioning.
102. The computer-program product of claim 99, further comprising code for determining a current resource partitioning between the first and second base stations before the receiving, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent only if the proposed resource partitioning is different than the current resource partitioning.
103. The computer-program product of claim 99, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an X2 backhaul.
104. The computer-program product of claim 99, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning is sent via an over-the-air message (OAM).
105. The computer-program product of claim 99, further comprising code for using an X2 setup procedure to initially associate the first and second base stations.
106. The computer-program product of claim 105, wherein the using comprises receiving, at the first base station, at least one of a class or an access mode of the second base station.
107. The computer-program product of claim 99, wherein the parameters comprise at least one of a total physical resource block (PRB) usage, a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) PRB usage, a non-GBR PRB usage, an average number of user equipment (UE) devices having queued dedicated traffic channel (DTCH) data, an average cell data rate for GBR bearers, or an average cell data rate for non-GBR bearers.
108. The computer-program product of claim 99, further comprising code for scheduling resources based on an independent resource partitioning determined by the first base station for user equipments (UEs) in an area covered only by the first base station.
109. The computer-program product of claim 99, wherein the proposed resource partitioning comprises one or more almost blank subframes (ABSs) of the first base station.
110. The computer-program product of claim 109, wherein the indication of the proposed resource partitioning comprises a load information message indicating the ABSs.
111. The computer-program product of claim 110, wherein the load information message comprises an information element (IE) indicating the ABSs.
112. The computer-program product of claim 99, wherein the first base station is a macro base station and wherein the second base station is a pico base station or a femto base station.
US13/084,763 2010-04-13 2011-04-12 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination Abandoned US20110249642A1 (en)

Priority Applications (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/084,763 US20110249642A1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-12 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
KR1020127029715A KR101495530B1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-13 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
CN201180024519.8A CN102907135B (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-13 Between base station, the adaptive resource for the interference coordination strengthened is consulted
PCT/US2011/032360 WO2011130438A1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-13 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
EP11717398.9A EP2559291B1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-13 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
ES11717398.9T ES2534640T3 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-13 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for improved interference coordination
JP2013505109A JP5766785B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-13 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for extended interference control
JP2015031606A JP2015136134A (en) 2010-04-13 2015-02-20 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
US15/969,516 US10674407B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2018-05-02 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US32381110P 2010-04-13 2010-04-13
US13/084,763 US20110249642A1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-12 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/969,516 Continuation US10674407B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2018-05-02 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110249642A1 true US20110249642A1 (en) 2011-10-13

Family

ID=44760874

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/084,763 Abandoned US20110249642A1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-04-12 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
US15/969,516 Active US10674407B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2018-05-02 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/969,516 Active US10674407B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2018-05-02 Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US20110249642A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2559291B1 (en)
JP (2) JP5766785B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101495530B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102907135B (en)
ES (1) ES2534640T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2011130438A1 (en)

Cited By (67)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110294514A1 (en) * 2010-05-28 2011-12-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Radio resource management in femtocells
US20120113812A1 (en) * 2010-11-08 2012-05-10 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Resource management system and method for inter-cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
US20120149362A1 (en) * 2010-06-18 2012-06-14 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Victim User Equipment Status
US20130045740A1 (en) * 2011-08-15 2013-02-21 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Automated triggers for application of cell association bias and/or interference mitigation techniques
US20130051351A1 (en) * 2010-04-28 2013-02-28 Lg Electronics Inc. Method of transmitting and receiving signals in a mobile communication system using a radio frame including multiple types of subframes and apparatus thereof
WO2013062354A2 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and device for inter cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
US20130170423A1 (en) * 2010-06-21 2013-07-04 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Interference reduction method and radio base station
US20130201968A1 (en) * 2010-04-16 2013-08-08 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, high-power base station, low-power base station, and communication control method
WO2013134723A1 (en) * 2012-03-09 2013-09-12 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and system for communicating between small cells using over-the-air transmissions
WO2013141652A1 (en) * 2012-03-22 2013-09-26 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for measuring interference strength in wireless communication system and device therefor
WO2013126843A3 (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-10-31 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Lte operation in small cells using dynamic shared spectrum
US20130301528A1 (en) * 2010-11-12 2013-11-14 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile communication method and radio base station
US8594672B2 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-11-26 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Methods and apparatus for interference management
US20130329628A1 (en) * 2011-01-30 2013-12-12 Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd Resource allocation method and device
US20130329636A1 (en) * 2010-11-05 2013-12-12 Alcatel Lucent Method and device for requesting almost blank subframes in heterogeneous networks
US20130343303A1 (en) * 2012-06-22 2013-12-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Communication method and apparatus using beamforming in a wireless communication system
US20140004859A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Success rate improvements for anr measurements while reducing data loss at a ue
EP2688352A1 (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-01-22 Alcatel Lucent Apparatus, method and computer programm for scheduling in a small cell base station transceiver
WO2014017880A1 (en) * 2012-07-27 2014-01-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Resource allocation method and apparatus for cooperative transmission of base stations in wireless communication system
WO2014027839A1 (en) * 2012-08-15 2014-02-20 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for performing handover in wireless communication system
US20140057669A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2014-02-27 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile communication system and mobile station
US8737276B2 (en) 2012-06-27 2014-05-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus using modified subframes
US8761097B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2014-06-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for enhancing uplink coverage in interference scenerios
US20140192740A1 (en) * 2013-01-10 2014-07-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods and apparatus for dual connectivity operation in a wireless communication network
WO2014126442A1 (en) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting indication in wireless communication system
US20140254541A1 (en) * 2011-11-03 2014-09-11 Kyocera Corporation Mobile communication system and mobile communication method
US8880109B2 (en) 2010-04-16 2014-11-04 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, high-power base station, low-power base station, and communication control method
CN104159235A (en) * 2014-08-26 2014-11-19 重庆邮电大学 Inter-cell interference coordination method for heterogeneous wireless network
CN104244260A (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-24 中国移动通信集团公司 Resource distribution method and device
WO2015069161A1 (en) * 2013-11-08 2015-05-14 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Downlink inter-cell interference determination
US9060377B2 (en) 2011-11-02 2015-06-16 Hitachi, Ltd. ABS-based method for inter cell interference coordination in LTE-advanced networks
US20150173086A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-18 Argela Yazilim ve Bilisim Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S. Interface between base stations for topology discovery to enable coordinated resource usage
US9084279B1 (en) * 2013-03-13 2015-07-14 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Downlink interference mitigation based on uplink transmission configuration of other coverage area
EP2897436A1 (en) * 2011-11-14 2015-07-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for reducing interference in a heterogeneous network
US20150215471A1 (en) * 2014-01-30 2015-07-30 Sony Corporation Unlicensed band usage measurement reporting
US9113451B2 (en) 2010-12-13 2015-08-18 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, base station, and control method thereof
KR20150097615A (en) * 2013-01-15 2015-08-26 후지쯔 가부시끼가이샤 Method, device, and system for negotiating inter-base station function
US20150245233A1 (en) * 2014-02-24 2015-08-27 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for measuring load of cell in wireless communication system
US20150249530A1 (en) * 2012-09-27 2015-09-03 Broadcom Corporation Method to coordinate resource allocation to address inter-cell interference
US9144071B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2015-09-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for effective allocation of adaptive resource partitioning information (ARPI) to pico enhanced node B by macro enhanced node B in heterogeneous network
EP2815608A4 (en) * 2012-02-17 2015-11-04 Nokia Technologies Oy Methods, apparatuses and computer program products for wlan discovery and handover in coexisted lte and wlan networks
US20150358989A1 (en) * 2013-01-21 2015-12-10 China Academy Of Telecommunications Technology Method, system and device for scheduling resource
CN105210400A (en) * 2013-08-16 2015-12-30 华为技术有限公司 Radio resource management method, coordinating controller, macro base station and first station
CN105282852A (en) * 2015-09-21 2016-01-27 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院 Full duplex resource distribution method of LTE-A system based on unified priority
US20160066315A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2016-03-03 Lili Zhang Method and apparatus for management of protected resource in a heterogeneous network
US9288804B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2016-03-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Almost blank subframe based orthogonal resource allocation in a wireless network environment
EP3059998A4 (en) * 2013-10-18 2016-11-09 Zte Corp Resource status obtaining method, apparatus, system and computer storage medium
US9516564B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2016-12-06 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of a cell reselection parameter in heterogeneous networks
CN106230542A (en) * 2012-03-01 2016-12-14 华为技术有限公司 The method and apparatus of interference coordination
WO2017019121A1 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-02-02 Intel Corporation Systems and methods for distributed fair resource allocation in multi radio access technology based heterogeneous networks
US9565577B2 (en) 2013-11-21 2017-02-07 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and apparatus for maximizing network capacity of cell sites in a wireless network
US9591539B2 (en) 2012-07-27 2017-03-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for interference control
US9621294B2 (en) 2014-10-02 2017-04-11 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of inter-cell interference coordination with adaptive reduced-power almost blank subframes based on neighbor cell profile data
US9635566B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2017-04-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of access points to support heterogeneous networks
US20180049074A1 (en) * 2010-04-28 2018-02-15 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for handover using x2 interface based on closed subscriber group in mobile communication system
US10075255B2 (en) 2014-03-11 2018-09-11 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) inter-cell-interference coordination
US10244539B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2019-03-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Wireless communication system and method for managing resource for interference coordination therein
US10448407B2 (en) * 2013-05-16 2019-10-15 Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad Interference cancellation enhancement in HetNets through coordinated SIMO/MIMO interference codes
US10517019B2 (en) * 2013-12-20 2019-12-24 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Radio resource optimization and management method, centralized controller and device
US10536229B2 (en) 2015-11-09 2020-01-14 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and device for providing coordinated communication of plurality of base stations in communication system to which beamforming is applied
US10567985B2 (en) * 2011-01-10 2020-02-18 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Relay node related measurements
US10631318B2 (en) 2015-12-31 2020-04-21 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Resource division method and apparatus
US10638498B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2020-04-28 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Frequency selective almost blank subframes
US10674407B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2020-06-02 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
US10680769B2 (en) 2018-10-01 2020-06-09 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Interference coordination in communication systems with dynamic spectrum management
US11291011B2 (en) * 2017-11-17 2022-03-29 Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. Resource allocation method and device
US11412465B2 (en) * 2016-11-03 2022-08-09 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for communication in mobile communication system

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8611295B2 (en) * 2010-06-21 2013-12-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive resource partitioning information (ARPI) transition behavior in heterogeneous networks
US9642147B2 (en) * 2011-02-14 2017-05-02 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for evaluating number of protected active users based on QoS requirements, throughput and traffic
CN103096325B (en) * 2011-10-31 2015-09-09 华为技术有限公司 A kind of mourn in silence processing method and device of control channel
JP6309900B2 (en) * 2012-01-26 2018-04-11 インターデイジタル パテント ホールディングス インコーポレイテッド Dynamic parameter adjustment for LTE coexistence
CN103379498A (en) * 2012-04-20 2013-10-30 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for sharing dynamic spectrums
US8838127B2 (en) * 2012-05-11 2014-09-16 Industrial Technology Research Institute Interference mitigation method in cellular wireless network, and apparatus with the same
WO2014073131A1 (en) * 2012-11-08 2014-05-15 日本電気株式会社 Wireless-resource setting method, system, base station, and non-transitory computer-readable medium
CN105191399B (en) * 2013-11-27 2019-01-15 华为技术有限公司 A kind of resource negotiation method, apparatus and node
CN105191383B (en) * 2013-12-25 2019-05-24 华为技术有限公司 Shared spectral method and device
KR102268512B1 (en) * 2014-07-15 2021-06-23 에스케이텔레콤 주식회사 Base station and control method thereof, terminal device
CN105451271B (en) * 2014-09-05 2019-07-02 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A kind of method for managing resource and device
JP5712328B2 (en) * 2014-10-06 2015-05-07 京セラ株式会社 Wireless communication system, base station and control method thereof
US9723624B2 (en) 2014-10-10 2017-08-01 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Wireless device reporting
CN104968050B (en) * 2015-05-25 2018-07-20 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 A kind of the e-ICIC resource allocation methods and device of LTE-A
GB2544111A (en) * 2015-11-06 2017-05-10 Nec Corp Communication system
CN106817670B (en) * 2015-12-01 2020-01-24 普天信息技术有限公司 Communication interference avoiding method and device
EP3522648B1 (en) 2016-11-01 2023-05-24 LG Electronics Inc. Method for configuring resources, for direct d2d communication, on basis of congestion control in wireless communication system and device therefor
CN108401518B (en) * 2017-12-07 2021-08-24 北京小米移动软件有限公司 Channel coordination method and device
KR102592663B1 (en) * 2018-05-25 2023-10-23 주식회사 엘지유플러스 Method for dividing traffic and main base station performin the method
CN110858994A (en) * 2018-08-23 2020-03-03 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 Energy-saving information sending method and device and storage medium
RU2768271C2 (en) * 2018-10-04 2022-03-23 Телефонактиеболагет Лм Эрикссон (Пабл) Sending reports by wireless communication device
WO2020142897A1 (en) * 2019-01-08 2020-07-16 华为技术有限公司 Scheduling method and apparatus, storage medium and communication system
EP4009564B1 (en) 2020-12-03 2023-12-06 Hon Lin Technology Co., Ltd. Method for allocating wireless resources based on sensitivity to inter-cell interference and apparatus thereof

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100029282A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Resource partitioning in heterogeneous access point networks
US20100195582A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2010-08-05 Nokia Corporation Method and Apparatus for Signaling Neighbor Cell Transmission Frame Allocations
US20110201339A1 (en) * 2008-10-29 2011-08-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Cell Type Information Sharing Between Neighbor Base Stations
US20130003646A1 (en) * 2010-02-10 2013-01-03 Juergen Michel Method and Device for Data Processing in a Wireless Network

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8782024B2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2014-07-15 International Business Machines Corporation Managing the sharing of logical resources among separate partitions of a logically partitioned computer system
FI119346B (en) 2006-09-28 2008-10-15 Teliasonera Ab Resource allocation in a wireless communication system
GB0725052D0 (en) * 2007-12-21 2008-01-30 Fujitsu Lab Of Europ Ltd Communications system
KR20090072124A (en) * 2007-12-28 2009-07-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for resource partitioning with predefined pattern and adaptive resource partitioning method
US8165098B2 (en) * 2008-02-11 2012-04-24 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Method for allocating resources in cell-edge bands of OFDMA networks
US9974065B2 (en) * 2008-06-25 2018-05-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Dynamic control blanking in heterogeneous networks
US8971241B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2015-03-03 Qualcolmm Incorporated Techniques for supporting relay operation in wireless communication systems
EP2409426A4 (en) * 2009-03-20 2015-04-08 Ct Of Excellence In Wireless Technology Cognitive interference management in wireless networks with relays, macro cells, micro cells, pico cells and femto cells
KR101547545B1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2015-09-04 삼성전자주식회사 A method for inter-cell interference coordination in a wireless communication system and an apparatus thereof
US8805429B2 (en) * 2009-06-02 2014-08-12 Lg Electronics Inc. Inter-cell interference mitigating method in wireless communication system and apparatus therefor
KR20120037948A (en) * 2009-07-21 2012-04-20 엘지전자 주식회사 Apparatus and method for transmitting channel state information in a wireless communication system
EP2476284B1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2014-01-15 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Methods and apparatuses for interference coordination in a telecommunications system
US20110228700A1 (en) * 2010-03-16 2011-09-22 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Subframe Allocation for In-Band Relay Nodes
US20110249642A1 (en) 2010-04-13 2011-10-13 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100029282A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Resource partitioning in heterogeneous access point networks
US20110201339A1 (en) * 2008-10-29 2011-08-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Cell Type Information Sharing Between Neighbor Base Stations
US20100195582A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2010-08-05 Nokia Corporation Method and Apparatus for Signaling Neighbor Cell Transmission Frame Allocations
US20130003646A1 (en) * 2010-02-10 2013-01-03 Juergen Michel Method and Device for Data Processing in a Wireless Network

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"3GPP TS 36.300 V10.2.0 Release 10" Dec. 2010 *
"3GPP TS 36.423 V8.8.0 Release 8" Dec. 2009 *
"How to calculate the numbers of used PRBs in LTE network?", https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_calculate_the_numbers_of_used_PRBs_in_LTE_network2 *
"LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); X2 Application Protocol (X2AP)". 3GPP TS 36.423 version 9.1.0 Release 9. Feb. 2010. *

Cited By (122)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10674407B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2020-06-02 Qualcomm Incorporated Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
US9848392B2 (en) 2010-04-16 2017-12-19 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, high-power base station, low-power base station, and communication control method
US8880109B2 (en) 2010-04-16 2014-11-04 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, high-power base station, low-power base station, and communication control method
US20130201968A1 (en) * 2010-04-16 2013-08-08 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, high-power base station, low-power base station, and communication control method
US20180049074A1 (en) * 2010-04-28 2018-02-15 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for handover using x2 interface based on closed subscriber group in mobile communication system
US20130051351A1 (en) * 2010-04-28 2013-02-28 Lg Electronics Inc. Method of transmitting and receiving signals in a mobile communication system using a radio frame including multiple types of subframes and apparatus thereof
US9166719B2 (en) * 2010-04-28 2015-10-20 Lg Electronics Inc. Method of transmitting and receiving signals in a mobile communication system using a radio frame including multiple types of subframes and apparatus thereof
US8761097B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2014-06-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for enhancing uplink coverage in interference scenerios
US9036594B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2015-05-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for enhancing uplink coverage in interference scenarios
US9629123B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2017-04-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for enhancing uplink coverage in interference scenarios
US8958806B2 (en) * 2010-05-28 2015-02-17 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Radio resource management in femtocells
US20110294514A1 (en) * 2010-05-28 2011-12-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Radio resource management in femtocells
US20120149362A1 (en) * 2010-06-18 2012-06-14 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Victim User Equipment Status
US20130170423A1 (en) * 2010-06-21 2013-07-04 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Interference reduction method and radio base station
US9113328B2 (en) * 2010-11-05 2015-08-18 Alcatel Lucent Method and device for requesting almost blank subframes in heterogeneous networks
US20130329636A1 (en) * 2010-11-05 2013-12-12 Alcatel Lucent Method and device for requesting almost blank subframes in heterogeneous networks
US20120113812A1 (en) * 2010-11-08 2012-05-10 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Resource management system and method for inter-cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
US9226312B2 (en) * 2010-11-08 2015-12-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Resource management system and method for inter-cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
US20130301528A1 (en) * 2010-11-12 2013-11-14 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile communication method and radio base station
US9119104B2 (en) * 2010-11-12 2015-08-25 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile communication method and radio base station
US9113451B2 (en) 2010-12-13 2015-08-18 Kyocera Corporation Radio communication system, base station, and control method thereof
US9844048B2 (en) 2010-12-13 2017-12-12 Kyocera Corporation Resource allocation system and control method
US10567985B2 (en) * 2011-01-10 2020-02-18 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Relay node related measurements
US9603150B2 (en) * 2011-01-30 2017-03-21 Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd Resource allocation method and device
US20130329628A1 (en) * 2011-01-30 2013-12-12 Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd Resource allocation method and device
US9144071B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2015-09-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for effective allocation of adaptive resource partitioning information (ARPI) to pico enhanced node B by macro enhanced node B in heterogeneous network
US20140057669A1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2014-02-27 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile communication system and mobile station
US20130045740A1 (en) * 2011-08-15 2013-02-21 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Automated triggers for application of cell association bias and/or interference mitigation techniques
US8914028B2 (en) * 2011-08-15 2014-12-16 Alcatel Lucent Automated triggers for application of cell association bias and/or interference mitigation techniques
US9173140B2 (en) 2011-09-29 2015-10-27 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Methods and apparatus for handover management
US8594672B2 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-11-26 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Methods and apparatus for interference management
US9520970B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2016-12-13 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and device for inter cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
US9686058B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2017-06-20 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling inter-cell interference in wireless communication system
WO2013062354A3 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-07-11 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and device for inter cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
WO2013062354A2 (en) * 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and device for inter cell interference coordination in wireless communication system
US9838175B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2017-12-05 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling inter-cell interference in wireless communication system
US9060377B2 (en) 2011-11-02 2015-06-16 Hitachi, Ltd. ABS-based method for inter cell interference coordination in LTE-advanced networks
US20140254541A1 (en) * 2011-11-03 2014-09-11 Kyocera Corporation Mobile communication system and mobile communication method
US9491630B2 (en) * 2011-11-03 2016-11-08 Kyocera Corporation Mobile communication system and mobile communication method
EP2897436A1 (en) * 2011-11-14 2015-07-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for reducing interference in a heterogeneous network
US9788327B2 (en) 2011-11-14 2017-10-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for reducing interference in a heterogeneous network
EP2815608A4 (en) * 2012-02-17 2015-11-04 Nokia Technologies Oy Methods, apparatuses and computer program products for wlan discovery and handover in coexisted lte and wlan networks
US9294929B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2016-03-22 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. LTE operation in small cells using dynamic shared spectrum
US10070431B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2018-09-04 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. LTE operation in small cells using dynamic shared spectrum
US9706545B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2017-07-11 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc LTE operation in small cells using dynamic shared spectrum
WO2013126843A3 (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-10-31 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Lte operation in small cells using dynamic shared spectrum
CN106230542A (en) * 2012-03-01 2016-12-14 华为技术有限公司 The method and apparatus of interference coordination
WO2013134723A1 (en) * 2012-03-09 2013-09-12 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and system for communicating between small cells using over-the-air transmissions
US9392598B2 (en) 2012-03-09 2016-07-12 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and system for communicating between small cells using over-the-air transmissions
US9294948B2 (en) 2012-03-22 2016-03-22 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for measuring interference strength in wireless communication system and device therefor
WO2013141652A1 (en) * 2012-03-22 2013-09-26 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for measuring interference strength in wireless communication system and device therefor
US9935699B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2018-04-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Communication method and apparatus using beamforming in a wireless communication system
US20130343303A1 (en) * 2012-06-22 2013-12-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Communication method and apparatus using beamforming in a wireless communication system
US10230440B2 (en) 2012-06-22 2019-03-12 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Communication method and apparatus using beamforming in a wireless communication system
US9055558B2 (en) 2012-06-27 2015-06-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus using modified subframes
US8737276B2 (en) 2012-06-27 2014-05-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus using modified subframes
US20140004859A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Success rate improvements for anr measurements while reducing data loss at a ue
US9479979B2 (en) * 2012-06-29 2016-10-25 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Success rate improvements for ANR measurements while reducing data loss at a UE
EP2688352A1 (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-01-22 Alcatel Lucent Apparatus, method and computer programm for scheduling in a small cell base station transceiver
WO2014017880A1 (en) * 2012-07-27 2014-01-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Resource allocation method and apparatus for cooperative transmission of base stations in wireless communication system
KR102019918B1 (en) 2012-07-27 2019-09-09 삼성전자 주식회사 Apparatus and method of resource allocation for cooperative transmission and reception among bss in wireless communication system
KR20140015904A (en) * 2012-07-27 2014-02-07 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method of resource allocation for cooperative transmission and reception among bss in wireless communication system
US10149171B2 (en) 2012-07-27 2018-12-04 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Resource allocation method and apparatus for cooperative transmission of base stations in wireless communication system
US10117104B2 (en) 2012-07-27 2018-10-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Resource allocation method and apparatus for cooperative transmission of base stations in wireless communication system
US9591539B2 (en) 2012-07-27 2017-03-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for interference control
US9578558B2 (en) 2012-08-15 2017-02-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for performing handover in wireless communication system
WO2014027839A1 (en) * 2012-08-15 2014-02-20 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for performing handover in wireless communication system
US10181932B2 (en) 2012-09-27 2019-01-15 Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited Method to coordinate resource allocation to address inter-cell interference
US20150249530A1 (en) * 2012-09-27 2015-09-03 Broadcom Corporation Method to coordinate resource allocation to address inter-cell interference
US11356216B2 (en) * 2013-01-10 2022-06-07 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods and apparatus for dual connectivity operation in a wireless communication network
US20140192740A1 (en) * 2013-01-10 2014-07-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods and apparatus for dual connectivity operation in a wireless communication network
US9907068B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2018-02-27 Fujitsu Limited Method for negotiating inter-eNB functions, apparatus and system therefor
EP2947912A4 (en) * 2013-01-15 2016-08-24 Fujitsu Ltd Method, device, and system for negotiating inter-base station function
KR101694084B1 (en) 2013-01-15 2017-01-06 후지쯔 가부시끼가이샤 METHOD FOR NEGOTIATING INTER-eNB FUNCTIONS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM THEREFOR
KR20150097615A (en) * 2013-01-15 2015-08-26 후지쯔 가부시끼가이샤 Method, device, and system for negotiating inter-base station function
CN104871592A (en) * 2013-01-15 2015-08-26 富士通株式会社 Method, device, and system for negotiating inter-base station function
US20150358989A1 (en) * 2013-01-21 2015-12-10 China Academy Of Telecommunications Technology Method, system and device for scheduling resource
US10237883B2 (en) * 2013-01-21 2019-03-19 China Academy Of Telecommunications Technology Method, system and device for scheduling resource
US9788254B2 (en) 2013-02-18 2017-10-10 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting indication in wireless communication system
WO2014126442A1 (en) * 2013-02-18 2014-08-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting indication in wireless communication system
US9084279B1 (en) * 2013-03-13 2015-07-14 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Downlink interference mitigation based on uplink transmission configuration of other coverage area
US9642135B2 (en) * 2013-04-15 2017-05-02 Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Method and apparatus for management of protected resource in a heterogeneous network
US20160066315A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2016-03-03 Lili Zhang Method and apparatus for management of protected resource in a heterogeneous network
US10448407B2 (en) * 2013-05-16 2019-10-15 Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad Interference cancellation enhancement in HetNets through coordinated SIMO/MIMO interference codes
CN104244260A (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-24 中国移动通信集团公司 Resource distribution method and device
CN105210400A (en) * 2013-08-16 2015-12-30 华为技术有限公司 Radio resource management method, coordinating controller, macro base station and first station
EP3059998A4 (en) * 2013-10-18 2016-11-09 Zte Corp Resource status obtaining method, apparatus, system and computer storage medium
JP2016539543A (en) * 2013-10-18 2016-12-15 ゼットティーイー コーポレイション Resource state acquisition method, apparatus and system, and computer storage medium
WO2015069161A1 (en) * 2013-11-08 2015-05-14 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Downlink inter-cell interference determination
US9565577B2 (en) 2013-11-21 2017-02-07 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and apparatus for maximizing network capacity of cell sites in a wireless network
US9924367B2 (en) 2013-11-21 2018-03-20 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and apparatus for maximizing network capacity of cell sites in a wireless network
US9392432B2 (en) * 2013-12-17 2016-07-12 Argela Yazilim ve Bilisim Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S. Interface between base stations for topology discovery to enable coordinated resource usage
US20150173086A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-18 Argela Yazilim ve Bilisim Teknolojileri San. ve Tic. A.S. Interface between base stations for topology discovery to enable coordinated resource usage
US10517019B2 (en) * 2013-12-20 2019-12-24 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Radio resource optimization and management method, centralized controller and device
US20150215471A1 (en) * 2014-01-30 2015-07-30 Sony Corporation Unlicensed band usage measurement reporting
US10735599B2 (en) * 2014-01-30 2020-08-04 Sony Corporation Unlicensed band usage measurement reporting
US20150245233A1 (en) * 2014-02-24 2015-08-27 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for measuring load of cell in wireless communication system
US10075255B2 (en) 2014-03-11 2018-09-11 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) inter-cell-interference coordination
US9635566B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2017-04-25 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of access points to support heterogeneous networks
US9288804B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2016-03-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Almost blank subframe based orthogonal resource allocation in a wireless network environment
US10341912B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2019-07-02 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of access points to support heterogeneous networks
US9398586B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2016-07-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. Almost blank subframe based orthogonal resource allocation in a wireless network environment
US9516564B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2016-12-06 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of a cell reselection parameter in heterogeneous networks
US10536880B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2020-01-14 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of a cell reselection parameter in heterogeneous networks
US10039095B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2018-07-31 Cisco Technology, Inc. Almost blank subframe based orthogonal resource allocation in a wireless network environment
CN104159235A (en) * 2014-08-26 2014-11-19 重庆邮电大学 Inter-cell interference coordination method for heterogeneous wireless network
US10966210B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2021-03-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Wireless communication system and method for managing resource for interference coordination therein
US10244539B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2019-03-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Wireless communication system and method for managing resource for interference coordination therein
US10680681B2 (en) 2014-10-02 2020-06-09 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Enhancement of inter-cell interference coordination with adaptive reduced-power almost blank subframes based on neighbor cell profile data
US9621294B2 (en) 2014-10-02 2017-04-11 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of inter-cell interference coordination with adaptive reduced-power almost blank subframes based on neighbor cell profile data
US10243622B2 (en) 2014-10-02 2019-03-26 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Enhancement of inter-cell interference coordination with adaptive reduced-power almost blank subframes based on neighbor cell profile data
US10638498B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2020-04-28 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Frequency selective almost blank subframes
WO2017019121A1 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-02-02 Intel Corporation Systems and methods for distributed fair resource allocation in multi radio access technology based heterogeneous networks
CN105282852A (en) * 2015-09-21 2016-01-27 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院 Full duplex resource distribution method of LTE-A system based on unified priority
US10536229B2 (en) 2015-11-09 2020-01-14 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and device for providing coordinated communication of plurality of base stations in communication system to which beamforming is applied
US10631318B2 (en) 2015-12-31 2020-04-21 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Resource division method and apparatus
US11412465B2 (en) * 2016-11-03 2022-08-09 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for communication in mobile communication system
US11291011B2 (en) * 2017-11-17 2022-03-29 Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. Resource allocation method and device
US20220132511A1 (en) * 2017-11-17 2022-04-28 Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. Resource allocation device
US11665723B2 (en) * 2017-11-17 2023-05-30 Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. First station, second station and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium
US10680769B2 (en) 2018-10-01 2020-06-09 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Interference coordination in communication systems with dynamic spectrum management
US11329774B2 (en) 2018-10-01 2022-05-10 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Interference coordination in communication systems with dynamic spectrum management

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2015136134A (en) 2015-07-27
CN102907135B (en) 2016-09-21
JP2013524737A (en) 2013-06-17
KR101495530B1 (en) 2015-02-26
EP2559291A1 (en) 2013-02-20
JP5766785B2 (en) 2015-08-19
CN102907135A (en) 2013-01-30
US10674407B2 (en) 2020-06-02
EP2559291B1 (en) 2015-01-14
US20180255482A1 (en) 2018-09-06
KR20130025399A (en) 2013-03-11
WO2011130438A1 (en) 2011-10-20
ES2534640T3 (en) 2015-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10674407B2 (en) Adaptive resource negotiation between base stations for enhanced interference coordination
US9282472B2 (en) Heterogeneous network (HETNET) user equipment (UE) radio resource management (RRM) measurements
US9288004B2 (en) Semi-persistent scheduling grants in heterogeneous networks
US9801189B2 (en) Resource partitioning information for enhanced interference coordination
US9363038B2 (en) Evolved node B channel quality indicator (CQI) processing for heterogeneous networks
US9306638B2 (en) Backhaul enhancements for cooperative multi-point (CoMP) operations
US9788327B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for reducing interference in a heterogeneous network
EP2676511B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for evaluating number of protected active users based on qos requirements, throughput and traffic
US20150049672A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for avoiding or escaping cell range expansion (cre) in a heterogeneous network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SONG, OSOK;DAMNJANOVIC, ALEKSANDAR;JI, TINGFANG;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20110602 TO 20110608;REEL/FRAME:026492/0023

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION