Zoeken Afbeeldingen Maps Play YouTube Nieuws Gmail Drive Meer »
Inloggen
Gebruikers van een schermlezer: klik op deze link voor de toegankelijkheidsmodus. De toegankelijkheidsmodus beschikt over dezelfde essentiŽle functies, maar werkt beter met je lezer.

Patenten

  1. Geavanceerd zoeken naar patenten
PublicatienummerUS8744443 B2
PublicatietypeVerlening
AanvraagnummerUS 13/208,048
Publicatiedatum3 juni 2014
Aanvraagdatum11 aug 2011
Prioriteitsdatum19 mei 2006
Ook gepubliceerd alsUS8010105, US20070268877, US20110294531
Publicatienummer13208048, 208048, US 8744443 B2, US 8744443B2, US-B2-8744443, US8744443 B2, US8744443B2
UitvindersAdrian Buckley, Michael J. Crowley
Oorspronkelijke patenteigenaarBlackberry Limited
Citatie exporterenBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Externe links: USPTO, USPTO-toewijzing, Espacenet
System and method for facilitating accelerated network selection using a weighted network list
US 8744443 B2
Samenvatting
A scheme for facilitating accelerated network selection by a wireless user equipment (UE) device. In one exemplary embodiment, prior to performing a full band scan, the wireless UE device is operable to interrogate a list of networks with which the wireless UE device has registered at least once in a given period of time, wherein a network availability likelihood score may be associated with each of the list of networks. A particular network is selected from the list of networks based on its network availability likelihood score.
Afbeeldingen(11)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(15)
What is claimed is:
1. A method operable on a wireless user equipment (UE) device for facilitating accelerated network selection, comprising:
for each network in a list of networks, collecting a respective plurality of data values that are each associated with a connection between the UE device and the respective network;
assigning a numeric value to a respective weighting factor associated with each data value of the plurality of data values;
for each network in the list of networks, applying a mathematical process to the plurality of data values associated with the network and the respective weighting factors to determine a score representing the availability of the network;
prior to performing a full band scan, selecting a network from the list of networks based on the respective score;
iteratively attempting a connection to each network of the list of networks in accordance with the respective score representing the availability of the network until a connection attempt is successful; and
responsive to selection of a particular network, adjusting the assigned numeric value of at least one respective weighting factor such that the particular network has a greater probability of being selected upon a subsequent connection attempt and updating the connections count corresponding to the selected network.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein collecting the plurality of data values comprises collecting at least one of duration of most recent call, total duration of all calls, percentage of connection attempts that have been successful, and time since a most recent successful connection.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising limiting the list of networks to include only those networks with which the UE device has connected within a given period of time.
4. A wireless user equipment (UE) device, comprising:
a storage module operably connected to a processor; and
a logic module for collecting, for each network in a list of networks, a respective plurality of data values that are each associated with a connection between the UE device and the respective network;
a logic module for assigning a numeric value to a respective weighting factor associated with each data value of the plurality of data values;
a logic module for applying, for each network in the list of networks, a mathematical process to the plurality of data values associated with the network and the respective weighting factors to determine a score representing the availability of the network;
a logic module for selecting, prior to performing a full band scan, a network from the list of networks based on the respective score;
a logic module for iteratively attempting a connection to each network of the list of networks in accordance with the respective score representing the availability of the network until a connection attempt is successful; and
a logic module, responsive to selection of a particular network, for adjusting the assigned numeric value of at least one respective weighting factor such that the particular network has a greater probability of being selected upon a subsequent connection attempt and for updating the connections count corresponding to the selected network, wherein the logic modules are one of software stored in the storage module, hardware and firmware.
5. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, further comprising a logic module for manipulating a scanning order sequence based on respective scores associated with each network of the list of networks.
6. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, wherein the storage module comprises a removable module.
7. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, wherein the storage module comprises a memory circuit integrated within the wireless UE device.
8. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, wherein the list of networks includes a network that is operable with at least one of IEEE 802.11 standard, HiperLan standard, HiperLan II standard, Wi-Max standard, OpenAir standard, and Bluetooth standard.
9. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, wherein the list of networks includes at least one of a General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) network, an Enhanced Data Rates for Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) Evolution (EDGE) network, a 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)-compliant network, an Integrated Digital Enhanced Network (IDEN), a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) network, a Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) network, a 3GPP2network, and a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) network.
10. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, wherein the list of networks is provided as part of a Universal Subscriber Identity Module (USIM) card, Removable User Identity Module (RUIM) card, a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) card, a compact Flash card, a Secure Digital (SD) card, or a memory circuit integrated within the wireless UE device.
11. The wireless UE device as recited in claim 4, further comprising a logic module, performed when multiple networks are determined to have identical scores, for choosing a particular network for service based on a priority parameter.
12. A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing instructions that, when executed by a processor on a wireless user equipment (UE) device, perform a method for facilitating accelerated network selection by the wireless UE device, the instructions comprising:
instructions for collecting, for each network in a list of networks, a respective plurality of data values that are each associated with a connection between the UE device and the respective network;
instructions for assigning a numeric value to a respective weighting factor associated with each data value of the plurality of data values;
instructions for applying, for each network in the list of networks, a mathematical process to the plurality of data values associated with the network and the respective weighting factors to determine a score representing the availability of the network;
instructions for selecting, prior to performing a full band scan, a network from the list of networks based on the respective score;
instructions for iteratively attempting a connection to each network of the list of networks in accordance with the respective score representing the availability of the network until a connection attempt is successful; and
instructions, responsive to selection of a particular network, for adjusting the assigned numeric value of at least one respective weighting factor such that the particular network has a greater probability of being selected upon a subsequent connection attempt and for updating the connections count corresponding to the selected network.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 12, wherein each of the plurality of data values are related to the availability of the respective network.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 12, further comprising instructions for scanning in a frequency band associated with the network selected from the list of networks.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 12, further comprising instructions for rearranging the networks in the list of networks in an order based on the score.
Beschrijving
PRIORITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. ß119(e) & 37 C.F.R. ß1.78

This nonprovisional application is a continuation application claiming the benefit of the following prior U.S. patent application entitled: “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING ACCELERATED NETWORK SELECTION USING A WEIGHTED NETWORK LIST”, filed May 18, 2007, application Ser. No. 11/750,417, which itself claims priority based upon the prior U.S. provisional patent application of the same name, Application No. 60/801,849, filed May 19, 2006, in the names of Adrian Buckley and Michael J. Crowley. Both of these priority documents are hereby incorporated by reference.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application discloses subject matter related to the subject matter disclosed in the following commonly owned co-pending U.S. patent application(s): (i) “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATING NETWORK SELECTION BY A WIRELESS USER EQUIPMENT (UE) DEVICE,” filed Jul. 1, 2005; application Ser. No. 11/173,083, in the name(s) of: Adrian Buckley, Andrew Allen and G. Scott Henderson and (ii) “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATING NETWORK SELECTION BY A WIRELESS USER EQUIPMENT (UE) DEVICE USING SATELLITE-BASED POSITIONING SYSTEM,” filed Jul. 1, 2005; application Ser. No. 11/173,040, in the name(s) of: Adrian Buckley and G. Scott Henderson.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present patent disclosure generally relates to communication networks. More particularly, and not by way of any limitation, the present patent application is directed to a system and method for facilitating accelerated network selection by a wireless user equipment (UE) device.

BACKGROUND

When a wireless user equipment (UE) device is first powered up or when it tries to recover from loss of coverage, it is typically required to search for its last registered Public Land Mobile Network (RPLMN) in every supported radio access technology and frequency bands associated therewith before attempting to register on another PLMN. The issue for operators is that when a UE device powers up after a power off condition and subsequent relocation to a new location, it may have to perform a full band scan (FBS) of all supported bands before possibly selecting a National Roaming Partner (NRP). Today, such a full scan already takes a fairly long time in a dense or complex radio environment, which will be further exacerbated when additional frequency bands are introduced and more access technologies are integrated.

In addition, it is important to note that in most scenarios a full band scan can give rise to inefficient utilization of radio and/or battery resources. Relatedly, the time to perform a full scan may be so long that the radio environment may have changed significantly between the time when the scan was started and the time the UE device decides to select a new PLMN. As a result, by the time the UE decides to select a new network, another high priority network may have appeared again.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the embodiments of the present patent disclosure may be had by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 depicts a generalized radio network environment wherein an embodiment of the present patent disclosure may be practiced when a wireless UE device is relocated to a new geographic area;

FIGS. 2A-2C depict exemplary embodiments relating to an overall scheme for selecting a particular network from a list of networks for connecting a wireless UE device;

FIGS. 3-6 depict exemplary tables that include a Last Recent PLMNs list structure as well as certain channel frequency coding schema according to the teachings of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7 depicts a table in which a list of networks is downloaded from a network base unit, such as a cell tower, for purposes of an embodiment of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 8 depicts a block diagram of an embodiment of a wireless device or UE/ME (user equipment/mobile equipment) device operable to accelerate network selection according to the teachings of the present patent disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In one embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method for facilitating accelerated network selection by a wireless UE device, comprising: prior to performing a full band scan, interrogating a list of networks with which the wireless UE device has registered at least once in a given period of time; determining a network availability likelihood score associated with each of the list of networks; and selecting a network from the list of networks based on its network availability likelihood score.

In another embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a method of assigning values to networks in a list of networks operable for connecting a wireless UE device, comprising: determining an array of data values corresponding to at least one prior connection attempt of the wireless UE device to a particular network, if the wireless UE device has previously attempted to connect to the particular network; and determining a network availability likelihood score for the particular network based upon the array of data values. It will be realized by one of ordinary skill in the art that an “array” as used herein merely refers to a list of elements, either in one-dimensional form (e.g., a vector) or in multidimensional form. Accordingly, where provided in a vector form, it should be understood that a data vector does not refer to any physical/spatial quantity having a magnitude and direction in conventional sense.

In a still further embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a wireless UE device, comprising: a storage module operative to contain: (a) a weighting factors array, each weighting factor of the weighting factors array being associated with a data type; (b) a list of networks; and (c) for each network of the list of networks, an array of data values including a data value of each data type; and a computation module operative to determine a network availability likelihood score of a selected network, of the list of networks, based upon the array of data values corresponding thereto and the weighting factors. In one implementation, the storage module may comprise removable storage module such as a Universal Subscriber Identity Module (USIM) card, Removable User Identity Module (RUIM) card, a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) card, or a compact Flash card, Secure Digital (SD) card, etc., or a memory circuit integrated within the UE device.

An apparatus and method of the present patent disclosure will now be described with reference to various examples of how the embodiments can best be made and used. Like reference numerals are used throughout the description and several views of the drawings to indicate like or corresponding parts, wherein the various elements are not necessarily drawn to scale. Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIG. 1, depicted therein is an exemplary generalized radio network environment 100 wherein one or more embodiments of the present patent disclosure may be practiced when a wireless user equipment (UE) device relocates to a new geographic area having the exemplary radio environment. For purposes of the teachings herein, a generalized wireless UE device 102 is deemed to be a mobile equipment (ME) device having a removable storage module, and may comprise any portable computer (e.g., laptops, palmtops, or handheld computing devices) or a mobile communications device (e.g., cellular phones or data-enabled handheld devices capable of receiving and sending messages, web browsing, et cetera), or any enhanced personal digital assistant (PDA) device or integrated information appliance capable of email, video mail, Internet access, corporate data access, messaging, calendaring and scheduling, information management, and the like, that is preferably operable in one or more modes of operation and in a number of frequency bands and/or radio access technologies (RATs). For example, UE device 102 may operate in the cellular telephony band frequencies such as 450 MHz, 700 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz, and 2.4 GHz, etc., as well as Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) bands. Further, other bands in which the UE device could operate wirelessly may comprise Wi-Max bands or one or more satellite bands. Accordingly, for purposes of the present patent disclosure, those skilled in the art should recognize that the term “UE device” or “wireless device” may comprise a ME device (with or without any removable storage module such as a USIM/RUIM/SIM card, or a compact Flash card, SD card, etc.) as well as other portable wireless information appliances, also with or without such storage modules.

By way of illustration, the radio network environment 100 is envisioned having as one or more categories of communication spaces capable of providing service to UE device 102 wherein system acquisition data provisioned with the device may be manipulated in accordance with the teachings set forth herein for purposes of facilitating accelerated network selection. In a wide area cellular network (WACN) space 104, there may exist any number of Public Land Mobile Networks (PLMNs) that are operable to provide cellular telephony services which may or may not include packet-switched data services. Depending on the coverage area(s) and whether the user is roaming, WACN space 104 can include a number of home networks 110 (i.e., home PLMNs or HPLMNs, or equivalent HPLMNs or EHPLMNs), visited networks (i.e., VPLMNs) 112, each with appropriate infrastructure such as Home Location Register (HLR) or Home Subscriber Server (HSS) nodes 115, Mobile Switching Center (MSC) nodes 116, and the like. Since the WACN space 104 may also include a General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) network that provides a packet radio access for mobile devices using the cellular infrastructure of a Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)-based carrier network, a Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) 114 is exemplified therein. Additionally, by way of generalization, the PLMNs of the WACN space 104 may comprise radio access and core networks selected from the group comprising Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) networks, Integrated Digital Enhanced Networks (IDENs), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) networks, Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) networks, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) networks, or any 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)-compliant network (e.g., 3GPP or 3GPP2), e.g., Evolution-Data Optimized (EVDO) networks, all operating with well known technologies, frequency bandwidths and protocols.

Further, UE device 102 is operable to obtain service from an access network (AN) space 106 that is connected to the WACN space 104. In one implementation, the AN space 106 includes one or more generic access networks (GANs) 118 as well as any type of wireless LAN (WLAN) arrangements 120, both of which may be generalized as any wireless AN that is operable to provide access services between UE device 102 and a PLMN core network using a broadband Internet Protocol (IP)-based network. WLAN arrangements 120 provide short-range wireless connectivity to UE device 102 via access points (APs) or “hot spots,” and can be implemented using a variety of standards, e.g., IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, HiperLan and HiperLan II standards, Wi-Max standard (IEEE 802.16 and IEEE 802.16e), OpenAir standard, and the Bluetooth standard (IEEE 802.15), and the like.

Additionally, there may exist an access network (AN) space 108 not interfaced to the WACN space 104 that offers short-range wireless connectivity to UE device 102. For instance, AN space 108 may comprise WLANs 122 offering non-3GPP services, such as communications over “public” access points (hotels, coffee shops, bookstores, apartment buildings, educational institutions, etc., whether free or for fee), enterprise access points, and visited (other enterprise) access points where the user may not be a member of that enterprise but is allowed at least some services.

Based on the foregoing, it should be recognized that the service infrastructure of the radio network environment 100 may be generalized into three broad segments: one or more radio access networks (RANs) (which can include cellular band technologies as well as WLAN technologies), one or more core networks (CNs), and one or more service networks (SNs). Depending on network ownership arrangements and service-level agreements, each RAN may support one or more CNs, each of which in turn may support one or more SNs. Such combinations of infrastructure equipment across multiple owners are sometimes used to create Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs). In some embodiments, the teachings of the present patent disclosure may equally be applicable to MVNOs as to PLMNs. Since each RAN, CN, or SN may be provided with its own network or system identifier (ID code), numerous RAN-CN-SN combinations may be available in the network environment 100. As will be seen below, regardless of how the exemplary radio network environment 100 to which the user of UE device 102 may have relocated is constituted, scanning/searching sequence order associated with UE device 102 may be advantageously manipulated so as to facilitate accelerated network selection, i.e., without having to perform a time-consuming FBS procedure while attempting to locate a network for service in the exemplary network environment.

Where CDMA networks are exemplified for use by a UE device, such networks may be identified by System Identifiers (SIDs) and Network Identifiers (NIDs), where a SID typically covers the area of a city or large town although there are no strict guidelines or requirements for the size of SIDs. Accordingly, the definition of each CDMA network may be determined by individual operators and/or national regulatory bodies. A “NID” is an optional subdivision of a SID, where a NID can identify, e.g., different rating areas, toll areas, private networks, MSC boundaries, or any other subdivision that an operator may want to distinguish within a SID. A national operator may have coverage over an entire country, where for certain countries, this can amount to tens and sometimes hundreds of cities/regions being covered.

WLANs may be identified by means of Service Set IDs (SSIDs) and GSM networks may be identified by means of Mobile Country Code (MCC) and Mobile Network Code (MNC) combinations. Further, different networks in a particular technology, e.g., GSM, may support different bands, e.g., selected from 450 MHz, 700 MHz, 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, and 1900 MHz. Likewise, CDMA technology (IS-95) networks may operate in two bands, 850 MHz and 1900 MHz, although additional bands may be added. In addition, there may be more than one system and acquisition table provisioned for a UE device, which may be integrated into a single database. As to storage, as alluded to before, the database structures along with certain network lists described below may be embodied in a removable module such as SIM, RUIM, USIM, Flash memory, or a storage memory circuit integrated within the UE device.

From time to time, the UE device 102 may occasionally be powered up after a power off condition and subsequent relocation to a new location, or may occasionally try to recover from loss of coverage, or may occasionally be required to change from one network to another. In a new environment, the UE device 102 may be configured to attempt to acquire a network; that is, to attempt to connect to a network. In such situations, the UE device 102 may be operative to perform an FBS or a modified scan sequence as set forth herein.

In an FBS, the UE device 102 may be configured to search for its last registered Public Land Mobile Network (RPLMN) in every supported radio access technology and frequency bands associated therewith before attempting to register on another PLMN. If the last PLMN is no longer available, the UE device 102 may then begin to search for networks according to a search/scan configuration scheme installed within the UE device 102 by a manufacturer, vendor or reseller.

In one embodiment, before beginning the FBS, the UE device 102 may attempt to search for a network in accordance with a method that includes at least one teaching of the present disclosure involving a stored network database structure (e.g., a list) for facilitating accelerated network selection. The method may facilitate selecting a particular network from a list of networks for connecting the UE device 102 based on certain criteria as will be described in detail hereinbelow. As alluded to previously, the list may be maintained, for example, within a storage module associated with the UE device 102, or may be maintained in another device that is accessible to the UE device 102. Each network of the list of networks may have a network availability likelihood score corresponding thereto, and the UE device 102 may be configured to attempt to connect to each network in the list of networks, in an order determined in accordance with the network availability likelihood score. An FBS may not be required, unless no network of the list of networks is presently available.

In other words, rather than (or prior to) searching all of the networks in an order programmed into the UE device 102 by a manufacturer, vendor, or reseller (e.g., in a system acquisition database), the UE device 102 may search a list of networks in accordance with a network availability likelihood score for each network identified in a storage structure. In another variation, the search sequence order associated with the system acquisition database may be manipulated based on the network availability likelihood score to accelerate network selection.

The list of networks may preferably include one or more networks with which the UE device 102 has previously and/or recently connected, or of networks with which the UE device 102 has attempted to connect. If desired, the list of networks may be limited to include only those networks with which the UE device 102 has connected within a recent period of time, e.g. one month, or with which a connection has exceeded a threshold signal strength or with no more than a threshold bit error. The UE device 102 may then iteratively search through the list of networks, rather than (or prior to) performing FBS, searching for a particular network whose network availability likelihood score indicates a high likelihood that the selected network may be available.

Since the UE device 102 may have been moved since it was last connected to any network, and since networks may become unavailable from time to time, the list of networks may include networks that are not presently available. For example, if the UE device 102 is taken on an international trip, only some of the networks to which the UE device 102 has previously been connected may be available. Similarly, the list of networks may include more than one network that is presently available. In a new location, several networks with which the UE device 102 has never previously connected may be available.

The list of networks may include at least one of: a WLAN network, an EVDO network, a Home or Equivalent Home PLMN (EHPLMN or HPLMN), any variety of UMTS networks (e.g., UMTS 800, UMTS 1900, UMTS 2100, and the like) or GSM networks (e.g., EGSM900, GSM1800, GSM850, GSM1900 network, and so on), a TDD network, an FDD network, a 3GPP/3GPP2-compatible network, to name a few. Where a WLAN is involved, it may be operable with a number of applicable standards as exemplified previously. The list of networks may be organized as a table, as a linked list, or as any other data structure. For example, the list of networks may be maintained as a table in which each row corresponds to a network, and having a column with an index according to which the networks of the list of networks may be searched. In another implementation, the index may be replaced with a pointer to another network having a lower network availability likelihood score. In yet another implementation, the list of networks may be maintained as a table of data arrays having information regarding previous connection attempts, and the list of networks may be searched in accordance with a network availability likelihood score that is determined on-the-fly based upon the data arrays, which may be weighted depending on certain factors.

If the list of networks is not indexed, then the UE device 102 may search through the list of networks to find a network whose network availability likelihood score indicates a greater likelihood of network availability than any other network of the list of networks. The UE device 102 may select a “most likely” network, and then may select a different network of the list of networks if the list of networks has more than one network and if the different network has a network availability likelihood score indicating a greater likelihood of being available. Since the list of networks may have only a few networks therein, and since the processing speed of the UE device 102 can be significant, a network of the list of networks can be selected promptly.

In some implementations, the UE device 102 may be capable of transmitting and receiving data over more than one channel, or of connecting to more than one network, simultaneously. Accordingly, more than one network of the list of networks may be selected. If the UE device 102 has an antenna or other port, or group of antennae and ports, that is/are capable of simultaneously communicating over more than one channel, or via more than one network, then more than one network may be selected.

As each network of the list of networks may be selected in an iterative process, the UE device 102 may attempt to connect to the selected network that has the highest availability score. If a connection attempt is not successful, then the UE device 102 may then search through the list of networks to find a yet-untried network whose network availability likelihood score indicates a greater likelihood of network availability than any other yet-untried network of the list of networks. Accordingly, the UE device 102 may iteratively attempt to connect to each network in the list of networks in an order determined in accordance with the network availability likelihood score of each network.

The exemplary methodology may thus comprise determining a network availability likelihood order, in accordance with the network availability likelihood score for each network of the list of networks, such that a scan/search sequence other than a default sequence may be implemented in order to accelerate network selection. Whereas the network availability likelihood scores may be stored in some sorted order, it need not be the case since the search sequence order may employ pointers to point to the actual sequence of searching regardless of the location of the networks within the database.

In one embodiment, the method may also include a Modified Full Band Scan (MFBS). If no network of the list of networks is presently available, the UE device 102 may perform a MFBS. The MFBS is similar to an FBS, but omits attempts to connect to networks that are in the list of networks. Since the MFBS proceeds after the UE device 102 has already determined that no network of the list of networks is presently available, the networks of the list of networks need not be tried within the MFBS.

The UE device 102 may maintain an array of data values for each network in the list of networks, for each successful connection attempt, and/or for each connection attempt regardless of success. By determining an array of data values corresponding to at least one connection attempt (on a per-network basis, for example, such as duration of most recent call, total duration of all calls, number of connection attempts that have been successful, number of connection attempts that have been unsuccessful, percentage of connection attempts that have been successful, time since a most recent successful connection, etc.), the UE device 102 may be able to update the network availability likelihood score based on certain weighting, smoothing, or normalization techniques.

The array of data values corresponding to the selected network may include at least one of: (a) a connections count, corresponding to a number of prior connections of the wireless UE device with the selected network; (b) a minutes count, corresponding to a total duration of prior connections of the wireless UE device and the selected network; and (c) a time lapse value, corresponding to an amount of elapsed time since at least one prior connection of the wireless UE device and the selected network.

In response to each successful connection, and/or in response to each connection attempt regardless of success, the data arrays may be updated. Alternatively, the data arrays may be updated from time to time, e.g., periodically. Moreover, if no network of the list of networks is presently available and an FBS and/or a MFBS identifies a network that is available, then the list of networks may be updated to include the network that is available, and may store a data array (or several data arrays) corresponding thereto. For each network, the UE device 102 may store a count of a number of successful connection attempts, a count of a number of unsuccessful connection attempts, and/or a count of a number of total connection attempts; if a connection attempt is successful, then the UE device 102 may create a data array indicating a duration of the connection, a time stamp, and/or other data. The array of data values corresponding to any network may be updated on-the-fly, i.e. in response to a connection attempt, regardless of whether the connection attempt is successful, and/or may be updated when a connection is terminated (so that the duration of the connection may be more easily calculated).

From time to time, the UE device 102 may update the network availability likelihood score. In one implementation, the UE device 102 may update the network availability likelihood score in response to a successful connection attempt, and/or in response to an unsuccessful connection attempt. In another implementation, the UE device 102 may update the network availability score each time a connection is terminated. In yet another implementation, the UE device 102 may update the network availability score for each network in the list of networks each time the UE device 102 is powered on and/or is powered off. The network availability likelihood score may be updated on-the-fly, i.e. for each network whenever the UE device 102 is powered up or when it tries to recover from loss of coverage, or may be updated as a background process in preparation for a subsequent power-up or recovery from loss of coverage. The network availability likelihood score may also or alternatively be updated periodically, e.g. in response to every nth connection, every nth connection attempt, and/or whenever no update has occurred within a predetermined number of days. The time stamp may be particularly relevant where a network may be available only during certain hours of each day, or only during weekdays or only during weekends. Also, since different networks may have different costs associated therewith, the network likelihood availability score may be biased in favor of less expensive networks.

For example, if the UE device 102 maintains both a count of total connection attempts and a count of successful connection attempts for each network of the list of networks, then the UE device 102 may be able to determine a percentage of connection attempts that have been successful. If a connection attempt is successful, then the network availability likelihood score may be modified to indicate that the network is more likely to be available for subsequent connection attempts; if a connection attempt is not successful, then the network availability likelihood score may be modified to indicate that the network is less likely to be available for subsequent connection attempts. Those skilled in the art will recognize that such computations may be modulated or refined further based on other factors as well.

In updating the network availability likelihood score, the UE device 102 may evaluate one or more arrays of data values corresponding to at least one prior connection attempt of the wireless UE device to one or more networks of the list of networks, if the wireless UE device has previously attempted to connect to the selected network. The UE device 102 may also update an order in which the list of networks is searched. The UE device 102 may compare the network availability likelihood score that has been updated with a network availability likelihood score of at least one other network in the list of networks. The UE device 102 may update an index and/or a linked list of networks to reflect an updated order, such that upon a subsequent execution of the method the UE device 102 can attempt to connect to each network of the list of networks in an order of decreasing likelihood of network availability. The order may be updated on-the-fly, i.e. for each network whenever the UE device 102 is powered up or when it tries to recover from loss of coverage, or may be updated as a background process in preparation for a subsequent power-up or recovery from loss of coverage.

Updating the network availability likelihood score may include determining a function of (a) a weighting factors array and (b) the array of data values. In one exemplary embodiment, determining the function includes at least one of, inter alia: (a) multiplying a connections count, corresponding to a number of prior connections of the wireless UE device and the selected network, by a connections count weighting factor of the weighting factors array; (b) multiplying a minutes count, corresponding to a total duration of prior connections of the wireless UE device and the selected network, by a minutes count weighting factor of the weighting factors array; and (c) multiplying a time lapse value, corresponding to an amount of elapsed time since at least one time/date stamp of at least one prior connection of the wireless UE device and the selected network, by a time lapse weighting factor of the weighting factors array. It will be appreciated that other parameters and/or variables may also be employed, which may involve their own corresponding weighting factors or values.

Additionally, the UE device 102 may update the weighting factors also, either periodically or otherwise. For example, the UE device 102 may update the weighting factors in response to each connection attempt. Various filtering approaches, such as adaptive filtering, may be used to update the weighting factors. The weighting factors may be updated periodically, e.g. in response to every nth connection, every nth connection attempt, and/or whenever no update has occurred within a predetermined number of days. One embodiment may comprise adjusting at least one weighting factor of the weighting factors array, such that the selected network is more likely to be selected upon a subsequent connection attempt. The method may further comprise at least one of: updating the connections count corresponding to the selected network; updating the minutes count corresponding to the selected network; and appending a time/date stamp to a list of time/date stamps corresponding to the selected network.

Accordingly, the methodology may comprise iteratively attempting a connection to each network of the list of networks in accordance with the network availability likelihood order until a connection attempt is successful; updating the array of data values corresponding to the selected network for which the connection attempt is successful; and updating the weighting factors array such that, within the network availability likelihood order, each network precedes each other network that is less likely to be available.

While updating the data arrays may be performed without significant computation, and while updating the network availability likelihood score for a network may be performed in response to the data arrays, updating the weighting factors may be more involved, and may include adjusting the means, modules and/or methods by which the network availability likelihood score is updated. Accordingly, updating the weighting factors may provide “feedback” to the updating of the network availability likelihood score.

An update module may be included, and may perform the updating of the data arrays, the network availability likelihood score, and/or and the weightings arrays. The update module may be operative to (a) update the weighting factors array such that the selected network is more likely to be selected upon a subsequent connection attempt, and (b) update the array of data values corresponding to the selected network, in response to a connection attempt of the wireless UE device and the selected network.

The update module may reside within a computation module, which may further be operative to determine a network availability likelihood score of each network, of the list of networks, based upon the array of data values corresponding thereto and based upon the weighting factors; and to assign a network availability likelihood order to each network, of the list of networks, in accordance with the array of data values corresponding thereto and in accordance with the weighting factors array.

Thus, an embodiment of a wireless UE device, such as the UE device 102 may comprise a storage module or storage means, and a computation module or computation means. The storage module or storage means is operative to contain: (a) a weighting factors array, each weighting factor of the weighting factors array being associated with a data type; (b) a list of networks; and (c) for each network of the list of networks, an array of data values including a data value of each data type. The computation module or computation means is operative to determine a network availability likelihood score of a selected network, of the list of networks, based upon the array of data values corresponding thereto and based upon the weighting factors.

The wireless UE device may accordingly also comprise an update module, in software, hardware, firmware, or in any combination thereof in suitable means, operative to (a) update the weighting factors array such that the selected network is more likely to be selected upon a subsequent connection attempt, and (b) update the array of data values corresponding to the selected network, in response to a connection attempt of the wireless UE device and the selected network. In one implementation, the array of data values corresponding to the selected network includes at least one of: (a) a connections count, corresponding to a number of prior connections of the wireless UE device and the selected network; (b) a minutes count, corresponding to a total duration of prior connections of the wireless UE device and the selected network; and (c) a time lapse value, corresponding to an amount of elapsed time since at least one prior connection of the wireless UE device and the selected network. Additionally, as alluded to previously, the computation means associated with the UE device is further operative to: determine a network availability likelihood score of each network, of the list of networks, based upon the array of data values corresponding thereto and based upon the weighting factors; and assign a network availability likelihood order to each network, of the list of networks, in accordance with the array of data values corresponding thereto and in accordance with the weighting factors array.

Referring now to FIGS. 2A-2C, depicted therein are exemplary embodiments relating to selecting a particular network from a list of networks for connecting a wireless UE device in accordance with the teachings set forth hereinabove. In particular, FIG. 2C depicts an overall scheme 200C wherein an FBS procedure may be advantageously avoided. Upon starting (block 252), which may involve e.g., re-powering the device after a loss of network connectivity, a list of networks may be interrogated prior to performing an FBS (block 254), wherein the list of networks is preferably populated with the networks with which the UE device has recently registered or in a given period of time (such as, for instance, a week, a month, etc.). A network availability likelihood score associated with each network may be determined as described herein (block 256), whereby a network may be selected based on its network availability likelihood score (block 258). Scanning may be effectuated in one or more frequency bands associated with the selected network for network discovery and subsequent registration (block 260). If there is no successful discovery and/or registration (block 262), the process flow may iteratively select the next likely network (blocks 264 and 258). Once a network is discovered, normal telecommunications operations may ensue thereafter (block 266).

With respect to FIGS. 2A and 2B, depicted therein is an exemplary methodology including assignment of values to networks in a list of networks operable for selection by a wireless UE device. As alluded to in the foregoing sections, the list of networks may include a variety of networks. As illustrated herein, an embodiment 200A may include attempting to connect (block 202) to at least one network of the list of networks, in accordance with an order and/or in accordance with a network availability likelihood score corresponding to the network of the list of networks. The method may include searching a list of networks (block 204), i.e. selecting a network of the list of networks and then selecting a different network of the list of networks (block 206) if the list of networks has more than one network and if the different network has a network availability likelihood score indicating a greater likelihood of being available.

Embodiment 200A may include determining and/or updating an array of data values (block 208) corresponding to at least one connection attempt of the wireless UE device to the selected network. The process may also comprise updating the connections count corresponding to the selected network, updating the minutes count corresponding to the selected network, and appending a time/date stamp to a list of time/date stamps corresponding to the selected network.

In another aspect, embodiment 200B relates to determining a network availability likelihood score for a selected network (block 210) based upon the array of data values. Determining a network availability likelihood score for the selected network further may include determining a function (block 212) of (a) a weighting factors array and (b) the array of data values. The function may correspond to the means, modules and/or methods described above. Specifically, the method may include (block 214) any known or heretofore unknown statistical and/or mathematical computations involving arrays, such as scalar product computations as exemplified hereinabove.

Embodiment 200B may further comprise adjusting (block 216) at least one weighting factor of the weighting factors array, such that a selected network is more likely to be selected upon a subsequent connection attempt., Additionally, as the network availability likelihood score is updated, the method may include determining a network availability likelihood order (block 218), in accordance with the network availability likelihood score for each network of the list of networks. For instance, the scores may be sorted such that within the network availability likelihood order each network precedes each other network that is less likely to be available. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the various operations set forth herein and elsewhere may be accomplished via a number of means, including software (e.g., program code), firmware, hardware, or in any combination, usually in association with a processing system. Where the processes are embodied in software, such software may comprise program instructions that form a computer program product, uploadable service application software, or software downloadable from a remote station, and the like.

Based on the foregoing, an exemplary application scenario may be described as follows. Since most people travel in a limited geographic area (home, work, school/daycare, gym, shopping mall, etc.), the network list associated with a subscriber would be relatively short. When the wireless UE device powers-on or otherwise seeks to acquire service, the PLMNs on the recent list would be checked to see if service is available from any of these PLMNs. If service is not available from any of the PLMNs on the list, an FBS or modified FBS may be initiated as alluded to previously. The network list could preferably be weighted so that most-frequently used PLMNs would be searched before less-frequently used ones. For example, the PLMN providing coverage for a user's home or work would probably be used more frequently than PLMNs used while traveling between home and work or while traveling out of the user's normal habitat. The weighing factor would be based on the amount of time spent in a PLMN coverage area. The list could also be weighted based on where service is usually reacquired. For example, if the user loses coverage while in an elevator or traveling through a tunnel, service would be reacquired after leaving the elevator or exiting the tunnel. So, the PLMNs at the reacquisition points would be prioritized higher even through the amount of time spent being served by the PLMN may be shorter than at the user's home or office. Similarly, if the user typically turns the wireless UE device off while having lunch and turns it on again afterward, the PLMN serving his favorite restaurant would have a higher priority on the reacquired service list than his home or office (where he spends more time).

FIGS. 3-6 depict exemplary database embodiments, e.g., tables, that include a Last Recent PLMNs list structure as well as certain channel frequency coding schema according to the teachings of the present disclosure. Table 300 of FIG. 3 may include a data array for each network of the list of networks. For example, in a first row, table 300 may include a data array or data vector pertaining to a network identified by a network IDa 302. The first row array may also include a channel and/or frequency band(s) 304 on which the UE device was last camped as well as a network time stamp 306 and a total time on network value 308. Other rows of the table of FIG. 3 may include other data arrays pertaining to other networks, e.g., IDb 310 and IDc 312, and may also include networks available nearby (i.e., “neighbor frequencies”).

The network time stamp 306 may be available directly from one or more networks, or may be maintained by a clock within the UE device. If available via the network, it is the last known time that the UE device made a registration on that network. In the case of GSM, the network time stamp may be associated with a Location Update, or in the case of GPRS, it may be associated with an Attach or Routing Area Update. The total time on network 308 may comprise the amount of time the UE device has spent on a network, which may be used to sort the networks in accordance with some order. A clock within the UE device may allow the UE device to determine a time stamp for unsuccessful connection attempts as well as for successful connection attempts. If a clock maintains the network time stamp 306, then the clock may be updated when a connection attempt is successful. A separate time stamp may be maintained for each connection attempt, or a time stamp may be maintained only for a most recent successful connection attempt. With respect to the channel/frequency column 304 of the network list 300, various known channel frequency coding schemes may be used wherein certain channels or frequencies may be scanned to find a particular network.

FIG. 4 depicts a Network ID Expansion Table 400 in accordance with one implementation of the embodiment described with respect to FIG. 3. For example, in FIG. 3, a network ID (network IDa) 302 may be associated with a pointer that points to a block 402 of data (pertaining to the network IDa) in a collection of table rows identified in block 402 within the Network ID Expansion Table 400 of FIG. 4. Similarly, a network ID (network IDb) 310 may be associated with a pointer to a block 404 of data (pertaining to the network IDb) in a collection of table rows identified in the block 404, and a network ID (network IDc) 312 may be provided with a pointer to a block 406 of data (pertaining to the network IDc) in a collection of table rows identified in the block 406. The data within each table may be stored as a TLV (i.e., a type/value/length) data format.

Table 500 depicted in FIG. 5 may allow further expansion of the table depicted in FIG. 4, which may be useful when a tag “A0” is present within a GSM block of data. Similarly, table 600 depicted in FIG. 6 may allow further expansion of the table depicted in FIG. 4, which may be useful when a tag “A1” is present within an FDD block of data. Although not shown, a similar table may also allow further expansion of the table depicted in FIG. 4, which may be useful when a tag “A2” is present within a TDD block of data.

FIG. 7 depicts a table 700 in which a list of networks may be downloaded from a network base unit, such as a cell tower, which may be operable according to the teachings of one embodiment of the present disclosure. The network base unit and the UE device may be preloaded with an extensive list of licensed networks, and the list of networks may therefore be implemented as a set of network identifiers indicating which licensed networks are available in a particular location. The list of networks may be provided from the network base unit via a broadcast message, in accordance with a broadcast message structure depicted in FIG. 7 wherein a column of Information Element Identifiers (IEIs) are provided. Each IEI may include an L2 Pseudo Length 702, a Radio Resource (RR) Management Protocol Discriminator 704, a Skip Indicator 706, and a System Information Type/Message Type 708. Finally, the broadcast message structure may include the list of networks, identified in FIG. 7 as a PLMN Channel List 710.

FIG. 8 depicts a block diagram of an embodiment of a wireless device or UE/ME device (designated UE device 800) operable to accelerate network selection according to the teachings of the present patent disclosure. It will be recognized by those skilled in the art upon reference hereto that although an embodiment of UE device 800 may comprise UE 102 shown in FIG. 1, there can be a number of variations and modifications, in hardware, software or firmware, with respect to the various modules depicted. Accordingly, the arrangement of FIG. 8 should be taken as illustrative rather than limiting with respect to the embodiments of the present patent disclosure. A microprocessor 802 providing for the overall control of UE device 800 is operably coupled to a communication subsystem 804 that includes transmitter/receiver (transceiver) functionality for effectuating multi-mode scanning and communications over a plurality of bands. By way of example, a wide area wireless Tx/Rx module 806 and an AN Tx/Rx module 808 are illustrated. Although not particularly shown, each Tx/Rx module may include other associated components such as one or more local oscillator (LO) modules, RF switches, RF bandpass filters, A/D and D/A converters, processing modules such as digital signal processors (DSPs), local memory, etc. As will be apparent to those skilled in the field of communications, the particular design of the communication subsystem 804 may be dependent upon the communications networks with which the UE device is intended to operate. In one embodiment, the communication subsystem 804 is operable with both voice and data communications.

Microprocessor 802 also interfaces with further device subsystems such as auxiliary input/output (I/O) 818, serial port 820, display 822, keyboard 824, speaker 826, microphone 828, random access memory (RAM) 830, a short-range communications subsystem 832, and any other device subsystems generally labeled as reference numeral 833. To control access, a removal storage module or RSM (SIM/RUIM/USIM) interface 834 is also provided in communication with the microprocessor 802. In one implementation, RSM interface 834 is operable with an RSM card having a number of key configurations 844 and other information 846 such as identification and subscriber-related data as well as one or more PLMN lists described in detail hereinabove, as well as preferred/forbidden SSID/PLMN lists, network weights, filters and other databases where applicable.

Operating system software and other control software may be embodied in a persistent storage module (i.e., non-volatile storage) such as Flash memory 835. In one implementation, Flash memory 835 may be segregated into different areas, e.g., storage area for computer programs 836 as well as data storage regions such as device state 837, address book 839, other personal information manager (PIM) data 841, and other data storage areas generally labeled as reference numeral 843. Additionally, appropriate network discovery/scanning selection logic 840 may be provided as part of the persistent storage for executing the various network discovery/scanning and accelerated selection procedures set forth in the preceding sections. Additionally or alternatively, another logic module 848 may be provided for facilitating home network authentication, location interrogation, etc. Associated therewith is a storage module, designated SSID/PLMN Data, Preference Lists and Filters 838, for storing the SSID/PLMN lists, location-based selection and/or scanning filters, capability indicators, etc.

In view of the teachings set forth herein, the various logic blocks of wireless UE device 800 should be understood as comprising at least one or more of the following: a logic structure for interrogating a list of networks with which the wireless UE device has registered at least once in a given period of time; a logic structure for determining a network availability likelihood score associated with each of the list of networks; and a logic structure for selecting a network from the list of networks based on its network availability likelihood score. Additionally, the various embodiments of computational techniques described hereinabove may be implemented in suitable software and/or firmware associated with the UE device 800.

It is believed that the operation and construction of the embodiments of the present patent application will be apparent from the Detailed Description set forth above. While the exemplary embodiments shown and described may have been characterized as being preferred, it should be readily understood that various changes and modifications could be made therein without departing from the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the following claims.

Patentcitaties
Geciteerd patent Aanvraagdatum Publicatiedatum Aanvrager Titel
US50273881 juni 199025 juni 1991Motorola, Inc.Method of selecting the most cost effective cellular service plan provided by cellular telephone resellers to multi-line customers
US542091428 feb 199430 mei 1995U S West Technologies, Inc.System and method for real time carrier selection
US559494915 dec 199414 jan 1997Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonMobile assisted channel allocation
US56235358 sept 199422 april 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Operations of cellular communications systems based on mobility and teletraffic statistics collected by mobile units
US56596019 mei 199519 aug 1997Motorola, Inc.Method of selecting a cost effective service plan
US570158512 dec 199423 dec 1997Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonMobile assisted handoff
US586248026 dec 199519 jan 1999Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for managing service accessibility between differing radio telecommunication networks
US589657219 juni 199720 april 1999Motorola, Inc.Method of adaptive channel acquisition at a subscriber unit
US595013018 maart 19977 sept 1999Sbc Technology Resources, Inc.Mobile station with intelligent roaming and over-the-air programming features
US595366526 dec 199614 sept 1999Nokia Mobile Phones LimitedMethod and apparatus for digital control channel (DCCH) scanning and selection in a cellular telecommunications network
US597432817 sept 199726 okt 1999Airtouch Communications, Inc.Rapid system access and registration in mobile phone systems
US598311513 aug 19969 nov 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Geographic based method for selecting a wireless communications service provider
US604414110 okt 199728 maart 2000Nortel Networks CorporationMethod and system for providing virtual agents for telephony services
US604424912 nov 199628 maart 2000Motorola, Inc.Method for determining handover margins in a cellular communication system
US616725024 sept 199726 dec 2000Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)Network based tariff acquisition system for roaming mobile subscribers
US622304226 juni 199724 april 2001At&T Wireless Services IncMethod of intelligent roaming using network information
US628586810 jan 19974 sept 2001Aeris Communications, Inc.Wireless communications application specific enabling method and apparatus
US632440016 sept 199827 nov 2001Ericsson Inc.Intelligent roaming mobile station for emulating a pre-intelligent roaming mobile station
US63470916 nov 199812 feb 2002Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)Method and apparatus for dynamically adapting a connection state in a mobile communications system
US634909913 dec 199919 feb 2002Nokia Networks OyConnection identification in transmission system of wireless telecommunication network over ATM protocol stack
US636009714 aug 200019 maart 2002Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus in a wireless communication unit for controlling a rate of background scanning
US638546026 mei 19987 mei 2002Conexant Systems, Inc.Power management system for a mobile unit by reduced neighbor cell scanning
US640503817 mei 199511 juni 2002Oki Telecom IncCellular carrier selection system incorporating a preferred list of system identification codes (SIDs) corresponding to preferred cellular carriers
US64773726 nov 20005 nov 2002Motorola, Inc.Method for a radiotelephone to scan for alternate radiotelephone systems
US65019517 mei 199931 dec 2002At&T Wireless Services, Inc.Method for controlling channel reselection
US652273510 okt 200018 feb 2003Nortel Networks LimitedNetwork selection support in a communications service bidding exchange
US654271621 nov 19961 april 2003Ericsson Inc.Position registration for cellular satellite communication systems
US656405519 sept 200013 mei 2003Telecommunication Systems, Inc.Intelligent roaming database (IRDB) updating
US660883223 juli 199819 aug 2003Telefonaktiebolaget Lm EricssonCommon access between a mobile communications network and an external network with selectable packet-switched and circuit-switched and circuit-switched services
US661151621 juni 199926 aug 2003Nokia Telecommunications OyjShort message service support over a packet-switched telephony network
US662545129 dec 199923 sept 2003Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc.Preferred roaming list and system select feature
US66909293 aug 199810 feb 2004Lucent Technologies Inc.Dynamic quality-of-service and pricing in communication system
US672826723 dec 199827 april 2004Nortel Networks LimitedService capable network
US674184814 nov 200125 mei 2004Nokia CorporationMethod and system of offering wireless telecommunication services in a visited telecommunication network
US67690007 sept 200027 juli 2004Nortel Networks LimitedUnified directory services architecture for an IP mobility architecture framework
US679570826 feb 200121 sept 2004Jayesh PatelConvergent wireless communication system
US69012575 jan 200131 mei 2005Nec CorporationMobile communication system for performing hand-off control based on channel station data
US695065520 juni 200327 sept 2005Interdigital Technology CorporationMethod and system wherein handover information is broadcast in wireless local area networks
US698573315 aug 200210 jan 2006Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for scanning for neighboring cells
US70794997 sept 200018 juli 2006Nortel Networks LimitedInternet protocol mobility architecture framework
US715193815 april 200319 dec 2006America Online, Inc.Dynamically managing and reconfiguring wireless mesh networks
US717121619 april 200130 jan 2007Cisco Technology, Inc.Method and system for detecting a preferred wireless network for a mobile device
US720970912 dec 200224 april 2007Fujitsu LimitedApparatus and method for discriminating information transmitted using radio signal
US2001000689216 feb 20015 juli 2001Barnett Richard E.Apparatus and method for automatically programming frequency scanning radio receivers
US200200594538 nov 200116 mei 2002Eriksson Goran A. P.Access point discovery and selection
US2002008204421 dec 200027 juni 2002Davenport David MichaelWireless communication with a mobile asset employing dynamic configuration of a software defined radio
US2002010185831 jan 20011 aug 2002Stuart Thro W.Communication services through multiple service providers
US200201197744 mei 200129 aug 2002Regina JohannessonMethod for PLMN selection
US2002016897624 juli 200114 nov 2002Ram KrishnanAccelerating acquisition of a preferred cellular system by a portable communication device using position location
US200201781181 feb 200228 nov 2002Hamilton Thomas E.Transaction based packet switched data service on a wireless network
US2003000392228 juni 20012 jan 2003Mcclure KennethGeographic area assisted system selection for mobile stations
US2003001782820 juli 200123 jan 2003Kotzin Michael D.Methods for mobile communication services selection
US2003011801520 dec 200126 juni 2003Magnus GunnarssonLocation based notification of wlan availability via wireless communication network
US2003012054121 dec 200126 juni 2003Siann Jonathan I.Storage and delivery of electronic media content with advertising
US2003014264129 jan 200231 juli 2003Arch Wireless Holdings, Inc.Managing wireless network data
US2003015892217 mei 200221 aug 2003Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.Method for operating wireless LAN card in wireless LAN system
US2003023259516 april 200318 dec 2003Baker Michael R.Wireless repeater apparatus, system, and method
US2004001779819 jan 200129 jan 2004Tuija HurttaSystem and method for providing a connection in a communication network
US2004007613022 okt 200222 april 2004Nobuyuki UchidaMethod, apparatus, and system for selecting a service provider system
US200400873055 aug 20036 mei 2004Jiang Yue Jun JohnMethod and system for cellular network traffic redirection
US200400933987 nov 200213 mei 2004Zhicheng TangMethod and apparatus for performing dual active scan
US2004011052310 dec 200210 juni 2004Atsushi IshiiMethods and apparatus for acquiring service from a more desirable communication system
US200401161325 dec 200317 juni 2004Hunzinger Jason F.Rapid acquisition and system selection of mobile wireless devices using a system map
US200401620588 dec 200319 aug 2004Dorron MottesMulti MVNO and service provider platform and management
US2004016565717 maart 200326 aug 2004Emilija SimicForward link repeater frequency watermarking scheme
US2004019230423 dec 200230 sept 2004Lorenzo CasacciaMethod, apparatus, and system for selecting a service provider system
US2004019230623 maart 200430 sept 2004Starhome GmbhPreferred network selection
US2004019232828 maart 200330 sept 2004Joe GiacaloneSystem and method for selecting communications coverage network information in a wireless communications device
US2004020389312 dec 200214 okt 2004Motorola, Inc.Method and device for choosing a system selection algorithm that is location dependent
US20040233868 *17 feb 200425 nov 2004Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaAtuomatic wireless connection selection
US200402485854 juni 20039 dec 2004Ulun KaracaogluMethod and apparatus for communication frequency determination
US2004024991520 mei 20039 dec 2004Russell Jesse E.Advanced multi-network client device for wideband multimedia access to private and public wireless networks
US2004025265613 juni 200316 dec 2004Shiu Da-ShanInter-frequency neighbor list searching
US200500202809 juni 200427 jan 2005Bryan HollandMobile station-based locator system
US20050055371 *5 juni 200310 maart 2005Singam SunderMethod and system to manage a network connection application
US2005006333423 sept 200324 maart 2005Intel CorporationSystems and methods for reducing communication unit scan time in wireless networks
US2005007027930 sept 200331 maart 2005Boris GinzburgDevice, system and method of selecting channels to be scanned in wireless network association
US200500851825 dec 200221 april 2005AlcatelRadio communication terminal broadcasting et reception method and broadcasting system
US200501305911 feb 200216 juni 2005Steven BouchiredSystem and method for efficient frequency use in a hybrid multi-spot satellite broadcasting system
US2005013067211 jan 200516 juni 2005Dean Richard F.Method and system for determining mobile station position
US200501414647 dec 200430 juni 2005Willey William D.Methods and apparatus for providing slot reservations for slotted messages in wireless communication networks
US20050227720 *12 nov 200413 okt 2005Research In Motion LimitedData-capable network prioritization with reject code handling
US2006000921630 juni 200412 jan 2006Welnick William EMultiple mode scanning
US2006003031825 april 20059 feb 2006Steve MooreCommon signaling method and apparatus
US2006006878127 sept 200430 maart 2006Research In Motion LimitedMethod and apparatus for efficient network scanning
US20060072507 *28 sept 20046 april 2006Praphul ChandraMinimizing handoffs and handoff times in wireless local area networks
US2006007382719 dec 20026 april 2006Nokia CorporationSystem and handover mechanism in frequency multilple band environment and equipment therefor
US2006017130411 april 20053 aug 2006Hill David RWLAN background scanning
US2006023470514 april 200519 okt 2006Nokia CorporationMethod, apparatus and computer program providing for rapid network selection in a multimode device
US2006024539228 april 20052 nov 2006Research In Motion LimitedNetwork selection scheme using a roaming broker (RB)
US200602468892 mei 20052 nov 2006Buchhop Peter KWireless Data Device Performance Monitor
US2006024689928 april 20052 nov 2006Research In Motion LimitedSystem and method for providing network advertisement information via a network advertisement broker (NAB)
US200700044041 juli 20054 jan 2007Research In Motion LimitedSystem and method for accelerating network selection by a wireless user equipment (UE) device using satellite-based positioning system
US200700044051 juli 20054 jan 2007Research In Motion LimitedSystem and method for accelerating network selection by a wireless user equipment (UE) device
US200700116998 juli 200511 jan 2007Toni KopraProviding identification of broadcast transmission pieces
US2007026887718 mei 200722 nov 2007Adrian BuckleySystem and Method for Facilitating Accelerated Network Selection Using a Weighted Network List
US2007027014228 feb 200722 nov 2007Research In Motion LimitedSystem and method for facilitating accelerated network selection in a radio network environment
US200800327364 aug 20067 feb 2008Cingular Wireless Ii, LlcNetwork identity and timezone (nitz) functionality for non-3gpp devices
US2009022256615 feb 20073 sept 2009National Institute Of Information And CommunicatioName System in Communication Network, and Naming Method
US201001567065 maart 201024 juni 2010Qualcomm IncorporatedMobile cellular identification database for enhanced gps performance
US2011024488723 aug 20106 okt 2011Tracbeam LlcLocating a mobile station and applications therefor
US2012003932526 okt 201116 feb 2012Adrian BuckleyMethod and device for network selection in multiple access technologies
US2012004066624 okt 201116 feb 2012Adrian BuckleyNetwork selection scheme using a roaming broker (rb)
CA2504497C30 okt 200318 okt 2011Research In Motion LimitedMethods and device for preferably selecting a communication network which makes data service available
CN1270742C20 okt 200323 aug 2006上海海天医药科技开发有限公司Antiseptic Chinese medicine composition and its prepn process
CN1430840A19 jan 200116 juli 2003诺基亚公司System and method for providing connection in communication network
EP0781064A37 nov 199613 okt 1999Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.Multi-mode mobile terminal
EP1460873B117 maart 200420 juli 2011NTT DoCoMo, Inc.Mobile unit, server and method of providing information
EP1641292B127 sept 200410 jan 2007Research In Motion LimitedMethod and apparatus for efficient network scanning
EP1703756B118 maart 200528 mei 2008Research In Motion LimitedMethod of scanning wireless frequencies
GB2353648A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2001008251A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2001211184A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2001235532A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2002232930A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2002236165A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2002286492A Titel niet beschikbaar
JP2005143088A Titel niet beschikbaar
SG178817A1 Titel niet beschikbaar
WO2004014101A35 aug 200318 maart 2004Roamware IncMethod and system for cellular network traffic redirection
WO2004014862A111 aug 200319 feb 2004Rutgers, The State UniversityNitro and amino substituted heterocycles as topoisomerase i targeting agents
WO2004047476A830 okt 200329 juli 2004Carl BindingManaging network resources for wireless communication
WO2004073338A113 feb 200326 aug 2004Research In Motion LimitedMethods and apparatus for providing manual selection of a communication network for a mobile station
WO2004077860A121 nov 200310 sept 2004Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod for operating terminals of a mobile radio communication system
WO2004081600A129 sept 200323 sept 2004J-Squared LtdSystem and method for global positioning system repeater
WO2004089031A325 maart 20042 dec 2004Kyocera Wireless CorpSystem and method for selecting communication network based on geographical location in a wireless communications device
WO2005002140A130 juni 20036 jan 2005Telecom Italia S.P.A.A method for network selection in communication networks, related network and computer program product therefor
WO2005018140A113 aug 200424 feb 2005Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Method of user terminal accessing quickly home network in wireless local area network
WO2005027557A112 sept 200324 maart 2005Ntt Docomo, Inc.Seamless handover in heterogeneous network
WO2006007218A126 mei 200519 jan 2006Motorola, Inc.Multiple mode scanning
WO2006044024A119 aug 200527 april 2006Motorola, Inc.Using an enhanced preferred roaming list in a terminal device
Niet-patentcitaties
Referentie
1CIPO, Notice of Allowance, Application No. 2,551,241, Mar. 30, 2012, 1 pg.
2CIPO, Notice of Allowance, Application No. 2,589,948, Aug. 8, 2013, 1 pg.
3CIPO, Notice of Allowance, Application No. 2,589,961, May 28, 2013, 1 pg.
4CIPO, Notice of Allowance, Application No. 2551238, Oct. 11, 2011, 1 pg.
5CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,032, Jul. 15, 2010, 3 pgs.
6CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,032, Jul. 18, 2012, 3 pgs.
7CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,032, Oct. 21, 2008, 2 pgs.
8CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,032, Sep. 10, 2013, 2 pgs.
9CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,035, Dec. 6, 2013, 4 pgs.
10CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,035, Feb. 26, 2010, 4 pgs.
11CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,545,035, Jul. 11, 2011, 2 pgs.
12CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,551,238, Jan. 25, 2011, 2 pgs.
13CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,551,238, Jun. 12, 2009, 4 pgs.
14CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,551,241, Mar. 9, 2011, 2 pgs.
15CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,551,241, Nov. 23, 2009, 4 pgs.
16CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,948, Jul. 12, 2010, 6 pgs.
17CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,948, May 15, 2012, 2 pgs.
18CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,948, Oct. 7, 2009, 3 pgs.
19CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,948, Sep. 2, 2011, 4 pgs.
20CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,961, Jul. 19, 2011, 4 pgs.
21CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,961, Jul. 6, 2010, 6 pgs.
22CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,961, Mar. 1, 2012, 4 pgs.
23CIPO, Office Action, Application No. 2,589,961, Nov. 28, 2012, 5 pgs.
24EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 05252666.2, Apr. 21, 2008, 5 pgs.
25EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 05254146.3, Jun. 16, 2009, 3 pgs.
26EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07103266.8, Jul. 31, 2008, 4 pgs.
27EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07108490.9, Feb. 16, 2010, 5 pgs.
28EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07108490.9, Mar. 20, 2008, 1 pg.
29EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07111440.9, Apr. 13, 2010, 6 pgs.
30EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07111440.9, Nov. 12, 2008, 6 pgs.
31EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07111443.3, Jan. 31, 2008, 1 pg.
32EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07111443.3, Sep. 29, 2008, 3 pgs.
33EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07111447.4, Jan. 31, 2008, 1 pg.
34EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07111447.4, Nov. 5, 2008, 6 pgs.
35EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07120521.5, Apr. 7, 2009, 4 pgs.
36EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 07120521.5, Aug. 6, 2008, 2 pgs.
37EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 08172106.0, Oct. 7, 2009, 1 pg.
38EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3), Application No. 07111440.9, Dec. 19, 2007, 3 pgs.
39EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, Application No. 05252665.4, Mar. 30, 2006, 3 pgs.
40EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, Application No. 05254147.1, Dec. 14, 2006, 7 pgs.
41EPO, Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2), Application No. 06126929.6, Oct. 25, 2007, 1 pg.
42EPO, Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC, Application No. 07103266.8, Dec. 4, 2012, 6 pgs.
43EPO, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, Application No. 07108490.9, Sep. 23, 2013, 6 pgs.
44EPO, Decision to Grant, Application No. 05254147.1, Feb. 14, 2008, 1 pg.
45EPO, Decision to Grant, Application No. 07111440.9, Feb. 3, 2011, 1 pg.
46EPO, Decision to Grant, Application No. 07111447.4, Oct. 1, 2009, 1 pg.
47EPO, Extended Search Report, Application No. 05254146.3, Feb. 21, 2006 10 pgs.
48EPO, Extended Search Report, Application No. 06126929.6, Mar. 8, 2007, 4 pgs.
49EPO, Extended Search Report, Application No. 07103266.8, Jul. 19, 2007, 8 pgs.
50EPO, Extended Search Report, Application No. 07108490.9, Nov. 2, 2007, 10 pgs.
51EPO, Extended Search Report, Application No. 07111447.4, Aug. 7, 2007, 8 pgs.
52EPO, Extended Search Report, Application No. 08172106.0, Feb. 11, 2009, 11 pgs.
53EPO, Search Report, Application No. 05252665.4, Sep. 13, 2005, 6 pgs.
54EPO, Search Report, Application No. 05252666.2, Sep. 6, 2005, 7 pgs.
55EPO, Search Report, Application No. 05254146.3, Nov. 21, 2005, 5 pgs.
56EPO, Search Report, Application No. 05254147.1, Feb. 22, 2006, 13 pgs.
57EPO, Search Report, Application No. 05254147.1, Feb. 7, 2006, 5 pgs.
58EPO, Search Report, Application No. 05254147.1, Nov. 15, 2005, 5 pgs.
59EPO, Search Report, Application No. 07111440.9, Sep. 24, 2007, 7 pgs.
60EPO, Search Report, Application No. 07111443.3, Oct. 2, 2007, 7 pgs.
61EPO, Search Report, Application No. 07120521.5, Dec. 19, 2007, 4 pgs.
62EPO, Search Report, Application No. 09151437.2, Apr. 8, 2009, 5 pgs.
63IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2005202767, Jul. 7, 2009, 1 pg.
64IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2006201729, Jan. 6, 2010, 2 pgs.
65IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2006201730, Nov. 10, 2009, 4 pgs.
66IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2006202765, Apr. 19, 2010, 2 pgs.
67IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2006202765, Nov. 1, 2010, 2 pgs.
68IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2010241215, Aug. 23, 2012, 2 pgs.
69IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance, Application No. 2005202767, Jul. 5, 2010, 3 pgs.
70IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance, Application No. 2006201729, Jul. 13, 2010, 3 pgs.
71IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance, Application No. 2006201730, Aug. 16, 2010, 3 pgs.
72IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance, Application No. 2006202765, May 11, 2011, 3 pgs.
73IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance, Application No. 2010241215, Oct. 25, 2012, 3 pgs.
74IP India, Examination Report, Applicatio No. 1538/del/2006, Dec. 15, 2011, 1 pg.
75IP India, First Examination Report, Application No. 1073/DEL/2006, Oct. 15, 2013, 2 pgs.
76IP India, First Examination Report, Application No. 1074/DEL/2006, Sep. 26, 2013, 2 pgs.
77IP India, Office Action, Application No. 1539/DEL/2006, Mar. 5, 2012, 2 pgs.
78IPO Taiwan, Office Action, Application No. 100120019, Nov. 26, 2013, 4 pgs.
79IPOS, Certification of Grant, Application No. 200604466-3, Dec. 31, 2008, 1 pg.
80JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2006122719, Jun. 7, 2011, 4 pgs.
81JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2006122719, Sep. 30, 2011, 3 pgs.
82JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2006122735, Jun. 7, 2011, 3 pgs.
83JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2011289379, Nov. 30, 2012, 3 pgs.
84JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejections, Application No. 2006180361, Aug. 18, 2011, 6 pgs.
85JPO, Notice of Reasons for Rejections, Application No. 2006180363, Aug. 23, 2011, 5 pgs.
86KIPO, Notice of Allowance of Patent, Application No. 1020060038143, Jan. 31, 2013, 1 pg.
87KIPO, Notice of Allowance of Patent, Application No. 1020060062202, Feb. 15, 2013, 3 pgs.
88KIPO, Notice of Allowance, Application No. 1020060038142, Jun. 26, 2013, 3 pgs.
89KIPO, Notice of Allowance, Application No. 1020060062200, Jul. 15, 2013, 3 pgs.
90KIPO, Office Action, Application No. 1020060038142, Jun. 19, 2012, 3 pgs.
91KIPO, Office Action, Application No. 1020060038143, Jul. 27, 2012, 8 pgs.
92KIPO, Office Action, Application No. 1020060062200, Dec. 26, 2012, 6 pgs.
93KIPO, Office Action, Application No. 10-2006-0062202, Sep. 27, 2012, 3 pgs.
94Publication: 3GPP, S2-034121, "PLMN and Core Network Operator Selections," Nokia, Siemens, TeliaSonera, Nov. 28, 2003, 5 pgs.
95Publication: 3GPP, TR 21.905, V 4.4.0, Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications, Oct. 31, 2001, 48 pgs.
96SIPO, First Office Action, Application No. 2006/10110892.6, Jan. 15, 2010, 4 pgs.
97SIPO, First Office Action, Application No. 2006/10143754.8, Jan. 8, 2010, 8 pgs.
98SIPO, First Office Action, Application No. 200610077263.8, Mar. 2, 2010, 6 pgs.
99SIPO, First Office Action, Application No. 200610077264.2, Dec. 5, 2008, 10 pgs.
100SIPO, Notification of Grant of Rights, Application No. 2006/10143754.8, Nov. 3, 2010, 2 pgs.
101SIPO, Reexamination Office Action, Application No. 200610077263.8, Jul. 19, 2013, 9 pgs.
102SIPO, Rejection Decision, Application No. 200610077263.8, Nov. 24, 2011, 5 pgs.
103SIPO, Rejection Decision, Application No. 200610077264.2, Jul. 2, 2012, 11 pgs.
104SIPO, Rejection Decision, Application No. 200610110892.6, Jan. 26, 2011, 8 pgs.
105SIPO, Second Office Action, Application No. 200610077263.8, Aug. 11, 2010, 7 pgs.
106SIPO, Second Office Action, Application No. 200610077264.2, Dec. 24, 2010, 9 pgs.
107SIPO, Second Office Action, Application No. 200610110892.6, Jul. 12, 2010, 4 pgs.
108SIPO, Third Office Action, Application No. 200610077264.2, Jan. 31, 2012, 8 pgs.
109SIPO, Third Office Action, Application No. 200610110892.6, Sep. 10, 2010, 2 pgs.
110TIPO, Decision of IPO, Application No. 095124093, Oct. 27, 2010, 3 pgs.
111TIPO, Office Action, Application No. 095115179, Mar. 10, 2011, 2 pgs.
112TIPO, Office Action, Application No. 095115180, Feb. 25, 2011, 2 pgs.
113TIPO, Office Action, Application No. 095124093, Jan. 22, 2010, 7 pgs.
114TIPO, Office Action, Application No. 095124095, May 30, 2011, 6 pgs.
115TIPO, Search Report, Application No. 095115179, Feb. 1, 2011, 1 pg.
116TIPO, Search Report, Application No. 095115180, Feb. 22, 2011, 1 pg.
117USPTO, Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Jul. 11, 2007, 3 pgs.
118USPTO, Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Feb. 2, 2011, 3 pgs.
119USPTO, Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,536, Jan. 3, 2012, 3 pgs.
120USPTO, Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/750,417, Oct. 27, 2010, 3 pgs.
121USPTO, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/279,903, Jul. 23, 2013, 15 pgs.
122USPTO, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Dec. 17, 2012, 7 pgs.
123USPTO, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due, U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,536, Dec. 24, 2012, 9 pgs.
124USPTO, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Jul. 1, 2011, 7 pgs.
125USPTO, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/750,417, Apr. 15, 2011, 5 pgs.
126USPTO, Notice of Publication, U.S. Appl. No. 13/279,903, Feb. 16, 2012, 1 pg.
127USPTO, Notice of Publication, U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,020, Feb. 16, 2012, 1 pg.
128USPTO, Notice of Publication, U.S. Appl. No. 13/859,890, Aug. 29, 2013, 1 pg.
129USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Feb. 14, 2011, 15 pgs.
130USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Feb. 24, 2009, 16 pgs.
131USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Feb. 6, 2008, 15 pgs.
132USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Jan. 19, 2010, 14 pgs.
133USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Jul. 2, 2008, 14 pgs.
134USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Mar. 29, 2007, 10 pgs.
135USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, May 29, 2009, 15 pgs.
136USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Oct. 13, 2006, 10 pgs.
137USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Sep. 14, 2010, 14 pgs.
138USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Sep. 17, 2009, 16 pgs.
139USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Sep. 25, 2007, 13 pgs.
140USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Apr. 15, 2008, 12 pgs.
141USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Aug. 12, 2009, 6 pgs.
142USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Jan. 28, 2010, 8 pgs.
143USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Jul. 21, 2010, 7 pgs.
144USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Mar. 28, 2011, 7 pgs.
145USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Mar. 5, 2009, 6 pgs.
146USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,470, Oct. 17, 2008, 11 pgs.
147USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, Apr. 1, 2008, 12 pgs.
148USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, Apr. 6, 2009, 10 pgs.
149USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, Jun. 23, 2011, 13 pgs.
150USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, May 14, 2010, 12 pgs.
151USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, Nov. 10, 2010, 14 pgs.
152USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, Nov. 16, 2009, 12 pgs.
153USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,040, Sep. 26, 2007, 17 pgs.
154USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Dec. 21, 2010, 12 pgs.
155USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Jan. 22, 2010, 11 pgs.
156USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Jul. 10, 2009, 12 pgs.
157USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Jun. 20, 2012, 38 pgs.
158USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Jun. 27, 2008, 10 pgs.
159USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,083, Mar. 25, 2008, 10 pgs.
160USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,536, Apr. 4, 2011, 18 pgs.
161USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,536, Aug. 16, 2010, 18 pgs.
162USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,536, Mar. 9, 2010, 16 pgs.
163USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,536, Oct. 26, 2011, 21 pgs.
164USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/750,417, Jan. 5, 2010, 16 pgs.
165USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/750,417, May 14, 2010, 17 pgs.
166USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/279,903, Apr. 15, 2013, 13 pgs.
167USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/279,903, Feb. 9, 2012, 13 pgs.
168USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/279,903, May 21, 2012, 16 pgs.
169USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,020, Feb. 24, 2014, 9 pgs.
170USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,020, Sep. 12, 2013, 7 pgs.
171USPTO, Supplemental Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/116,461, Sep. 21, 2011, 3 pgs.
Verwijzingen naar dit patent
Citerend patent Aanvraagdatum Publicatiedatum Aanvrager Titel
US911913910 april 201325 aug 2015Blackberry LimitedSystem and method for facilitating accelerated network selection in a radio network environment
US915503310 april 20136 okt 2015Blackberry LimitedSystem and method for accelerating network selection by a wireless user equipment (UE) device
US20170013444 *16 juni 201612 jan 2017Intel CorporationMethod for updating preferred roaming list of uim card
Classificaties
Classificatie in de VS455/435.2, 370/338, 455/435.3, 370/328, 455/434, 455/452.2, 370/331, 455/432.1, 370/329
Internationale classificatieH04W48/18, H04W4/00
CoŲperatieve classificatieH04W48/18
Juridische gebeurtenissen
DatumCodeGebeurtenisBeschrijving
11 aug 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, CANADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUCKLEY, ADRIAN;CROWLEY, MICHAEL J.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070713 TO 20070719;REEL/FRAME:026737/0805
28 feb 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: BLACKBERRY LIMITED, ONTARIO
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:032376/0056
Effective date: 20130709