Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The remarkable metre per second speed 6'4, 18 stone Cokanasiga clocked in training

By Ian Cameron
Cokanasiga in action for Bath (Getty Images)

It’s been a big weekend for ‘Big Joe’ Cokanasiga.

His man of the match display against Italy saw former England head coach Sir Clive Woodward inevitably liken him to Jonah Lomu. Comparing any outsized wingers to the New Zealand great is one of rugby’s most well-trodden clichés, and one Eddie Jones was quick to dismiss.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That’s ridiculous,” said Jones. “That tells you why when you have the television on you should have the commentary down.”

That said, the physical similarities are plain to see. Like Lomu, Cokanasiga stands 6’4 and tips the scales at 18 stone. Yet size as a winger is useless if you don’t have the athleticism to go with it – and Cokanasiga has that in spades.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The Fijian born wing – full name Ratu Josateki Tuivanuavou Waqanivalu Cokanasiga – has clocked over 10 metres a second over 50m in training at Bath. Since arriving last summer he has officially become the fastest player on the books at the club – faster than England flyers Anthony Watson and Jonathan Joeseph.

For comparison, Ireland’s fastest international player – Jacob Stockdale – has been clocked at 9.97 mps.

England’s fastest player – Jonny May – was clocked in 2017 at 10.49 metres per second in a 40-metre speed test. While there are no metres per second times for the pre-GPS Lomu – the 18 stone plus All Black was reputed to run the 100 metres in a time of 10.8 seconds (although that a number that has not been verified).

Fellow speedster May has been suitably impressed by Big Joe.

“Joe is very gifted athletically and he’s also a huge bloke. He’s strong and very, very fast. He has got the world at his feet, really,” May said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For a winger, that athletic ability is huge and then on top of that you’ve got to build your smartness and your game understanding. He’s continuing to do that.

“He’s getting better, he’s learning and he’s added to the group. He has earned his opportunity this week and I’m sure he’s going to have a pretty decent game.

“I haven’t known Joe that long but he’s quite quiet. He has a little bit of cheekiness about him – he has got a cheeky grin on his face.

“He is quite a reserved guy but he is starting to open up a little bit more. We might have a game of pool with him, or a game of darts, and have a laugh.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 7 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year
Search